headers
doepain | 10 Mar 2008 20:00
Picon

Two separate instances of Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server.


Is it possible (and I am sure that it is) to have two separate instances of
Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server, and connected through the
ISAPI redirector to IIS running on the local system.

If so could you please guide me in the right direction?

Thanks.

-----
Sr. Systems Engineer
Boston, Ma
--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Two-separate-instances-of-Tomcat-running-on-a-single-Windows-2003-server.-tp15951920p15951920.html
Sent from the Jakarta - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Mark Thomas | 10 Mar 2008 20:26
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Two separate instances of Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server.

doepain wrote:
> Is it possible (and I am sure that it is) to have two separate instances of
> Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server, and connected through the
> ISAPI redirector to IIS running on the local system.
> 
> If so could you please guide me in the right direction?

The right direction is the Tomcat users list.

See http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html

Mark
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
shanmuk babu | 13 Mar 2008 21:59
Picon
Favicon

Re: Two separate instances of Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server.


Your tomcats need to be listening on different ports,
but other than 
that there's nothing special about this setup.
--- doepain <doepain <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Is it possible (and I am sure that it is) to have
> two separate instances of
> Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server, and
> connected through the
> ISAPI redirector to IIS running on the local system.
> 
> If so could you please guide me in the right
> direction?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -----
> Sr. Systems Engineer
> Boston, Ma
> -- 
> View this message in context:
>
http://www.nabble.com/Two-separate-instances-of-Tomcat-running-on-a-single-Windows-2003-server.-tp15951920p15951920.html
> Sent from the Jakarta - General mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Petar Tahchiev | 25 Mar 2008 02:02
Picon

Cactus Release Archives

Hi everybody,

I am following this tutorial:

http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess

and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the archives I
have uploaded
here:

http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/

and report problems if you find some.

If no problems occur, I will continue with the next steps of the tutorial
and make
"official" release archives and cast a vote upon them.

Thank you all.

P.S. You can also have a look at the new Cactus web-site I have uploaded
here:

http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/

I am currently doing final test upon it and then I will upload it as
"official" Cactus site.

--

-- 
Regards, Petar!
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
sebb | 29 Mar 2008 02:26
Picon

Re: Cactus Release Archives

On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla.lists <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
>  I am following this tutorial:
>
>  http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess
>
>  and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the archives I
>  have uploaded
>  here:
>
>  http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/
>
>  and report problems if you find some.

Not sure it's useful to include the bz2 archives; although they are
slightly smaller, the user-base is much smaller...

The licenses/README.txt file does not seem to agree with the jars in
the lib directory.

Also, several of the jars in the lib directory are quite old versions;
if possible, they should be updated.

The generated cactus jars must contain NOTICE and LICENSE files (e.g.
in the META-INF directory)

It would be useful if the cactus jar manifests included the following
attributes:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
sebb | 29 Mar 2008 02:43
Picon

Re: Cactus Release Archives

On 29/03/2008, sebb <sebbaz <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla.lists <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Hi everybody,
>  >
>  >  I am following this tutorial:
>  >
>  >  http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess
>  >
>  >  and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the archives I
>  >  have uploaded
>  >  here:
>  >
>  >  http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/
>  >
>  >  and report problems if you find some.
>
>
> Not sure it's useful to include the bz2 archives; although they are
>  slightly smaller, the user-base is much smaller...
>
>  The licenses/README.txt file does not seem to agree with the jars in
>  the lib directory.
>
>  Also, several of the jars in the lib directory are quite old versions;
>  if possible, they should be updated.
>
>  The generated cactus jars must contain NOTICE and LICENSE files (e.g.
>  in the META-INF directory)
>
>  It would be useful if the cactus jar manifests included the following
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Petar Tahchiev | 30 Mar 2008 00:48
Picon

Re: Cactus Release Archives

Hi Sebb,

thanks for the feedback.

I prefer to keep the bz2 archives. I have improved the licenses according
to the lib folder. Also I have made the MANIFEST.MF to include the
data you pointed. Also the META-INF folder to include the LICENSE and
NOTICE files. I have also included the 'source' and 'target' versions in the
parent pom.xml and also the inceptionYear attribute.
Now I think that everything is OK.

You can see the new files here:
http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/1.8.0/

Tomorrow morning I will cast a release-vote for these archives.

Cheers, Petar.

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:43 AM, sebb <sebbaz <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> On 29/03/2008, sebb <sebbaz <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla.lists <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >  > Hi everybody,
> >  >
> >  >  I am following this tutorial:
> >  >
> >  >
> http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess
> >  >
> >  >  and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
sebb | 30 Mar 2008 05:39
Picon

Re: Cactus Release Archives

On 29/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla.lists <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
>  thanks for the feedback.
>
>  I prefer to keep the bz2 archives. I have improved the licenses according
>  to the lib folder.

There are still several jars in the lib directory which are not
mentioned in the licenses/README.txt.

README.txt says:     Apache ServletAPI - Apache 2.0

However, the MANIFEST in servlet-api-2.5.jar suggests that the owner
is Sun, not Apache, and the license may not be AL 2.0.

> Also I have made the MANIFEST.MF to include the data you pointed.

But the compiler versions are not in
cactus.core.framework.uberjar.javaEE.14-1.8.0.jar.

Also, the version says source and target = 1.4, yet the code was built
(and presumably tested) with Java 1.6. The code should be built and
tested with Java 1.4.

I just tried "mvn install" with Java 1.4, and a lot of tests failed.
The ones I checked failed with:

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/w3c/dom/ranges/DocumentRange
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
sebb | 31 Mar 2008 22:49
Picon

Re: Cactus Release Archives

On 30/03/2008, sebb <sebbaz <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla.lists <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Hi Sebb,
>  >
>  >  thanks for the feedback.
>  >
>  >  I prefer to keep the bz2 archives. I have improved the licenses according
>  >  to the lib folder.
>
>
> There are still several jars in the lib directory which are not
>  mentioned in the licenses/README.txt.
>
>  README.txt says:     Apache ServletAPI - Apache 2.0
>
>  However, the MANIFEST in servlet-api-2.5.jar suggests that the owner
>  is Sun, not Apache, and the license may not be AL 2.0.
>
>
>  > Also I have made the MANIFEST.MF to include the data you pointed.
>
>
> But the compiler versions are not in
>  cactus.core.framework.uberjar.javaEE.14-1.8.0.jar.
>
>  Also, the version says source and target = 1.4, yet the code was built
>  (and presumably tested) with Java 1.6. The code should be built and
>  tested with Java 1.4.
>
>  I just tried "mvn install" with Java 1.4, and a lot of tests failed.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Petar Tahchiev | 1 Apr 2008 00:37
Picon

Re: Cactus Release Archives

OK,

sorry for bringing this so long but this is my first time
I am making a release and as you see I am not so confident.

I have uploaded the new archives here:

http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/1.8.0/

with the following changes:
0) Now everything is built with JDK 1.4
1) The L&N files are included.
2) The MANIFEST.MF is proper (according to me).
3) I have removed the duplicate maven-release-plugin
declaration, which used to bring the line:
<tagBase>file:////home/peter/tags/≤/tagBase>

I have made the archives from the trunk.
I have no RC tag.

If the archives are OK, I will cast a vote upon them
and if the vote succeeds I will copy the trunk in a tag.

The only issue I see now is that we have the DEPENDENCIES file
in the META-INF, but since it is not a blocking issue I will leave as it
is. (Actually I couldn't find anywhere in the web how to remove this file).

Please can you have a look over the artifacts and in case there are any
problems,
I will be glad to work on fixing them.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane