headers
Stefan Bodewig | 1 Jun 2006 11:18
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

[GUMP <at> vmgump]: Project jakarta-site2 (in module jakarta-site2) failed

To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at general <at> gump.apache.org.

Project jakarta-site2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 2 projects,
 and has been outstanding for 20 runs.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
    - jakarta-regexp-package :  Java Regular Expression package
    - jakarta-site2 :  The Jakarta site

Full details are available at:
    http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided:
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed

The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/gump_work/build_jakarta-site2_jakarta-site2.html
Work Name: build_jakarta-site2_jakarta-site2 (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 1 sec
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xalan/build/serializer.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xalan/build/xalan-unbundled.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/build/xercesImpl.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar
org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
sebb | 1 Jun 2006 13:06
Picon

Re: [site] Copyright dates

On 31/05/06, sebb <sebbaz <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31/05/06, Henri Yandell <bayard <at> generationjava.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 5/31/06, sebb <sebbaz <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I updated the stylesheet to change the Copyright statement from
> > >>> 1999-2005 to 1999-2006 a week or so ago.
> > >>>
> > >>> Of course this changes all the generated HTML pages.
> > >>>
> > >>> I've not yet updated them, as I wanted to double-check if this was
> > >>> needed or not (the stylesheet could be changed back).
> > >>>
> > >>> OR: would it be better to just change the copyright in files that have
> > >>> been updated this year?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> s/better/required/g.
> > >>
> > >> In other words, the copyright years in a file must include only the years
> > >> in
> > >> which that file was modified.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Henri Yandell | 1 Jun 2006 17:10

Re: [site] Copyright dates


On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, sebb wrote:

> At present, all the pages contain the footer:
>
> Copyright (c) 1999-2005, The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal information_
>
> where _Legal information_ is a link to the legal page (which
> definitely needs updating to 2006!)
>
> IIUC, the new footer would just be:
>
> _Legal information_
>
> Is that correct?
>
> Or would it be better to have:
>
> Copyright (c) The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal information_
>
> i.e. remove just the dates from all footers.

That sounds good - I'm pretty sure it's not going to be bad to do that and 
change it later. Not having the first part will seem quite out of context.

Once it's changed, I'll ping Cliff for confirmation.

Hen
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Martin Cooper | 1 Jun 2006 19:10
Picon
Favicon

Re: [site] Copyright dates

On 6/1/06, Henri Yandell <bayard <at> generationjava.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, sebb wrote:
>
> > At present, all the pages contain the footer:
> >
> > Copyright (c) 1999-2005, The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal
> information_
> >
> > where _Legal information_ is a link to the legal page (which
> > definitely needs updating to 2006!)
> >
> > IIUC, the new footer would just be:
> >
> > _Legal information_
> >
> > Is that correct?
> >
> > Or would it be better to have:
> >
> > Copyright (c) The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal information_
> >
> > i.e. remove just the dates from all footers.
>
> That sounds good - I'm pretty sure it's not going to be bad to do that and
> change it later. Not having the first part will seem quite out of context.

I think it would be worth asking whether or not a "copyright" notice without
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Henri Yandell | 1 Jun 2006 19:38

Re: [site] Copyright dates


On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:

> I think it would be worth asking whether or not a "copyright" notice without
> specified years is actually meaningful. My expectation is that it would not
> - i.e. that it would not imbue the pages with copyright protection at all.
>
> I guess the first question is: Do we care about our pages being copyrighted?
> I would expect that we do, in which case I believe we should make people
> aware of that. If we take the attitude that the copyright applies to the
> site and not to the individual pages, then I guess we could go back to what
> sebb was talking about in the first place, and use a boilerplate copyright
> on each page.

Mebbe we should bring it up on legal-discuss. The irritating thing with 
not being able to do boilerplate is that every site out there does 
boilerplate, from Slashdot to Microsoft to the BBC.

That way we can help get an ASF policy rather than just how we do things. 
We're the only project I've found so far who have a link from the 
copyright to a terms of use/legal info page, and I suspect that every ASF 
project uses boilerplate updating at the moment.

Hen
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Roland Weber | 1 Jun 2006 19:45

Re: [site] Copyright dates

Martin Cooper wrote:

> I think it would be worth asking whether or not a "copyright" notice
> without
> specified years is actually meaningful. My expectation is that it would not
> - i.e. that it would not imbue the pages with copyright protection at all.

My expectation is that copyright protection applies simply because
we own the copyright, not because of some notice being in the page.
The notice is just to make people aware of the fact.

But copyright is different from the USA here in Germany.

cheers,
  Roland
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
sebb | 1 Jun 2006 21:08
Picon

Re: [site] Copyright dates

On 01/06/06, Roland Weber <http-async <at> dubioso.net> wrote:
> Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> > I think it would be worth asking whether or not a "copyright" notice
> > without
> > specified years is actually meaningful. My expectation is that it would not
> > - i.e. that it would not imbue the pages with copyright protection at all.
>
> My expectation is that copyright protection applies simply because
> we own the copyright, not because of some notice being in the page.
> The notice is just to make people aware of the fact.

+1

> But copyright is different from the USA here in Germany.
>

And in the UK probably too, but IANAL...

===

I'm going to revert the stylesheet back to 2005, and update the legal
page to 2006.

This will reduce the number of pages that are updated - until such
time as this discussion is resolved...

s///
(or perhaps I should sign off as s\\\ this time!)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Stefan Bodewig | 2 Jun 2006 10:19
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

[GUMP <at> vmgump]: Project jakarta-site2 (in module jakarta-site2) failed

To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at general <at> gump.apache.org.

Project jakarta-site2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 2 projects,
 and has been outstanding for 23 runs.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
    - jakarta-regexp-package :  Java Regular Expression package
    - jakarta-site2 :  The Jakarta site

Full details are available at:
    http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided:
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed

The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/gump_work/build_jakarta-site2_jakarta-site2.html
Work Name: build_jakarta-site2_jakarta-site2 (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 1 sec
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xalan/build/serializer.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xalan/build/xalan-unbundled.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/build/xercesImpl.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar
org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Henri Yandell | 3 Jun 2006 00:22

File Permissions on people


Reminder from Infra to make sure the directories are 775 and the files are 
664 on distribution and web directories on people.apache.org.

ie) /www/jakarta.apache.org/ and /www/www.apache.org/dist/

The easy way to do this is to type:

umask 2

before making changes to those directories.

The easiest way (and yes, my home directory is wide open to you all :) ) 
is to put umask 2 in your .profile file.

It's in our interest to do this, if we don't then the rsyncs to the 
mirrors and the real websites don't work.

Hen
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Mario Ivankovits | 3 Jun 2006 00:28
Picon

Re: File Permissions on people

Hi!
> Reminder from Infra to make sure the directories are 775 and the files
> are 664 on distribution and web directories on people.apache.org.
>
You can use the following in your home-directory (or whatever directory
as base) to reset those permissions.

find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 664
find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 775

Ciao,
Mario
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane