3 Jan 2007 15:41
Re: InfoD-Cafe: Ragged Right?
Carel Kuitenbrouwer <carelfhm <at> kuitenbrouwer.nl>
2007-01-03 14:41:03 GMT
2007-01-03 14:41:03 GMT
Dear Gunnar et al, I think I agree with most of what you write about the fervent arguments made for ragged right or justified based on the wrong examples. It all depends on how well either of them is done and both serve different needs. In the discussion (though I have to admit I didn't read everything that passed) I haven't read much about the difference between two kinds of ragged rights. In Dutch we call them 'vrije regelval' and 'Engelse regelval', which could be translated into 'free right' and 'English right' and they mean WITHOUT hyphenation and WITH respectively. Off course, the first will use more space, but what about readability? Is it not in a lot of cases preferable NOT to break up words? Or at least to do this in a sensible way (wich is something we non-english-speakers couldn't begin to follow, but that's another point entirely) Happy New Year, Carel Op 28 dec 2006, om 3:33 heeft Swanson, Gunnar het volgende geschreven: > from: David Sless sent: Thu 11/23/2006 6:56 PM >> Paul is too modest. >> >> The article he mentions is one of the best I have ever read >> on the subject. Further, I think it's a model of good writing >> in Information Design. It combines the best of craft know-how, >> critical reviewing of the relevant research and a careful >> articulation of principles--a model of what academics call the >> blend between theory and practice. >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed