headers
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho | 1 Apr 08:16
Picon

Re: Debug without recompile

On 3/31/07, Mattias Gaertner <nc-gaertnma <at> netcologne.de> wrote:
> Solution: add them to the project or package.

Does that include images, resource files, and other things like that?

--

-- 
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Mattias Gaertner | 1 Apr 09:43
Picon
Favicon

Re: Debug without recompile

On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 08:16:59 +0200
"Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho" <felipemonteiro.carvalho <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/31/07, Mattias Gaertner <nc-gaertnma <at> netcologne.de> wrote:
> > Solution: add them to the project or package.
> 
> Does that include images, resource files, and other things like that?

Yes.

Mattias
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Mattias Gaertner | 1 Apr 10:04
Picon
Favicon

Re: Fixed Debian package 0.9.22-1

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:16:07 +0200
"Marco Ciampa" <ciampix <at> libero.it> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 03:51:28PM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > The debian package had wrong links.
> > I upoaded a new debian package 0.9.22-1 with correct links to
> > startlazarus, lazarus and lazbuild.
> > 
> > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=89339
> > 
> I see that the Debian support is improving every day and IMHO this is
> GREAT because of the big influence that this distribution is gaining
> (see Ubuntu for an example).
> 
> In spite of this, the Debian support is not completed yet due to this
> two bugs:
> 
> - the UTF8 support is not working (perhaps in 0.9.22 is fixed)
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=408512

Already fixed by Marc.

 
> - but the simpler to fix is this:
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413806

The debian packages on sourceforge depends on the fpc-src package,
which contains the sources. Maybe together with Carlos Laviola we can
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Michael Van Canneyt | 1 Apr 12:08
Favicon

Regenerate Makefiles ?

Hello,

In order to be able to create shared libraries with the LCL
on X86_64 systems, the LCL must be compiled as PIC code when 
on this platform. The RTL and FCL are already compiled with 
the PIC option (-Cg). fpcmake automatically adds this option 
to the Makefile if it detects the X86_64 CPU.

However, the Lazarus makefile seems to be generated with an older
version of fpcmake, and does not contain the -Cg option, therefore
the LCL is not compiled with it.

I remade the Makefiles, and everything seems to work OK.
Could someone of the Lazarus crew do the same (with a 
recent enough fpcmake, obviously) and commit it ?

Beware, in order to remake them, you'll need to change the
'fcl' entry under [require] with at least

fcl-base fcl-image fcl-xml fcl-db fcl-registry

or fpcmake will complain about package fcl not being found.
This needs to be done in ALL Makefile.fpc files in the lazarus
tree. (it takes some work :) )

After that, a simple

fpcmake -Tall -r 

in the top lazarus dir will regenerate all makefiles.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 13 comments |
headers
Vincent Snijders | 1 Apr 12:36
Picon
Favicon

Re: Regenerate Makefiles ?

Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
> Hello,
> 
> In order to be able to create shared libraries with the LCL
> on X86_64 systems,

All X86_64 systems, or just x86_64-linux?

  the LCL must be compiled as PIC code when
> on this platform. The RTL and FCL are already compiled with 
> the PIC option (-Cg). fpcmake automatically adds this option 
> to the Makefile if it detects the X86_64 CPU.
> 
> However, the Lazarus makefile seems to be generated with an older
> version of fpcmake, and does not contain the -Cg option, therefore
> the LCL is not compiled with it.
> 
> I remade the Makefiles, and everything seems to work OK.
> Could someone of the Lazarus crew do the same (with a 
> recent enough fpcmake, obviously) and commit it ?
> 
> Beware, in order to remake them, you'll need to change the
> 'fcl' entry under [require] with at least
> 
> fcl-base fcl-image fcl-xml fcl-db fcl-registry

Can the makefile then be used with fpc 2.0.4?

> 
> or fpcmake will complain about package fcl not being found.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 12 comments |
headers
Marco Ciampa | 1 Apr 14:39
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Fixed Debian package 0.9.22-1

On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 10:04:26AM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
[...]
Great, you all (fpc developers) are always very kind and pricise.

Thank you.

--

-- 

Marco Ciampa

+--------------------+
| Linux User  #78271 |
| FSFE fellow   #364 |
+--------------------+
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bisma Jayadi | 1 Apr 16:25
Picon
Favicon

Re: 0.9.22 released

> The Lazarus team is glad to announce the 0.9.22 release. This release
> is based on fpc 2.0.4.

TComboBox's height still can't be changed, in any ways. :-(

-Bee-

has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Vincent Snijders | 1 Apr 16:33
Picon
Favicon

Re: 0.9.22 released

Bisma Jayadi schreef:
>> The Lazarus team is glad to announce the 0.9.22 release. This release
>> is based on fpc 2.0.4.
> 
> TComboBox's height still can't be changed, in any ways. :-(
> 

Was this bug closed in the bug tracker? Was it mentioned as fixed in the 
  announcement?

Vincent
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Vincent Snijders | 1 Apr 16:34
Picon
Favicon

Re: 0.9.22 released

Steven Graham schreef:
> 
> Great job guys! 0.9.22 feels a lot more stable than 0.9.20 ever did! 
> There's still trouble with scroll bars on the TTreeView component and 
> the Version Info that you can put into your programs stops anything from 
> compiling, but other than that, this release feels very very solid!

Just to be sure, are this bugs mentioned in the bug tracker?

Vincent
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bisma Jayadi | 1 Apr 16:55
Picon
Favicon

Re: 0.9.22 released

> Was this bug closed in the bug tracker?

http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=1904

Reported since v.9.13. IMO, it isn't (win)api limitation since Delphi does allow 
to set TComboBox's height to any values.

-Bee-

has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |

Gmane