> Zitat von ik <idokan <at> gmail.com>: > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 14:38, Osvaldo Filho <arquivostcf <at> gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Ubuntu 9.10 64 >>> Lazarus svn >>> FPC 2.4.1 >>> >>> Problems: >>> - Need permission on /usr/share/lazarus >>> /usr/share/lazarus/components/codetools/codetoolsstrconsts.pas(280) >>> Error: Writing Resource String Table file: >>> >>> >>> /usr/share/lazarus/components/codetools/units/x86_64-linux/codetoolsstrconsts.rst >>> >>> /usr/share/lazarus/components/fpcunit/ide/testcaseopts.pas(41,1) >>> Error: Can't create object file: >>> /usr/share/lazarus/components/fpcunit/ide/lib/x86_64-linux/testcaseopts.o >>> >>> Error: Can't create object file: >>> /usr/share/lazarus/components/printers/lib/x86_64-linux/gtk2/cupsdyn.o >>> >> >> Unless you change permissions to /usr/share/lazarus you will be unable to >> compile lazarus on that location unless you are root . > > lazarus checks if the output directory is writable. If it is not writable it > uses ~/.lazarus/lib/≤packagename>/... > > Maybe you already changed the permissions, but then compiled as root? In > that case some files were created as root and can not be overwritten as > normal user. > > Please fix the permissions of /usr/share/lazarus (including sub > directories). All files there should be owned by root and not writable by > normal users. > > If you use lazarus svn, I recommend to put the svn into your home directory > (owned by your account). Otherwise your error reports will easily confuse > people. > > >>> - Why ? >>> /usr/share/lazarus/ide/lazarus.pp(1,1) Fatal: Can't find unit >>> codetools used by Lazarus >>> >> >> I guess it because it was never compiled to an objct/unit ... > > > Mattias > > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > Lazarus <at> lists.lazarus.freepascal.org > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus >

> Thanks Mattias. > But why i have this: > > "/usr/share/lazarus/ide/lazarus.pp(1,1) Fatal: Can't find unit > codetools used by Lazarus"

> Hello, > > maybe it's a bit late to bring this issue (for the current releases), > but is there a reason there was no announcements for the later FPC > releases and no Lazarus announcements ever? > I think LWN is an important channel to divulging OSS projects. >

> Flávio Etrusco schreef: >> >> Hello, >> >> maybe it's a bit late to bring this issue (for the current releases), >> but is there a reason there was no announcements for the later FPC >> releases and no Lazarus announcements ever? >> I think LWN is an important channel to divulging OSS projects. >> > > What is LWN? > > Vincent >

> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Vincent Snijders > <vsnijders <at> vodafonevast.nl> wrote: >> Flávio Etrusco schreef: >>> Hello, >>> >>> maybe it's a bit late to bring this issue (for the current releases), >>> but is there a reason there was no announcements for the later FPC >>> releases and no Lazarus announcements ever? >>> I think LWN is an important channel to divulging OSS projects. >>> >> What is LWN? >> >> Vincent >> > > I could swear I had written in the message "Linux Weekly News" somewhere :-S