headers
i man | 2 Feb 2009 15:35

Query 1

All,

I plan to decomission one node which has a VCS and some disks assigned to VXFS.  The node has to be removed from VCS and then reinstall the OS on the system. VXFS has some disks coming from EMC SAN. Do I need to remove the disks from the VXFS before I reinstall the OS so as to not create any problems on the SAN side. I have switched off all the service groups and removed the node from the VCS cluster already. Also would it be wise to uninstall the VXFS from the node ?

Ciao


<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<p>All,</p>
<p>I plan to decomission one node which has a VCS and some disks assigned to VXFS.&nbsp; The node has to be removed from VCS and then reinstall the OS on the system. VXFS has some disks coming from EMC SAN. Do I need to remove the disks from the VXFS before I reinstall the OS so as to not create any problems on the SAN side. I have switched off all the service groups and removed the node from the VCS cluster already. Also would it be wise to uninstall the VXFS from the node ?</p>

<p>Ciao</p>
</div>
<br>
</div>
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Doug Hughes | 2 Feb 2009 15:48
Picon

Re: Query 1

i man wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I plan to decomission one node which has a VCS and some disks assigned 
> to VXFS.  The node has to be removed from VCS and then reinstall the 
> OS on the system. VXFS has some disks coming from EMC SAN. Do I need 
> to remove the disks from the VXFS before I reinstall the OS so as to 
> not create any problems on the SAN side. I have switched off all the 
> service groups and removed the node from the VCS cluster already. Also 
> would it be wise to uninstall the VXFS from the node ?
>
you don't need to do anything special for the reinstall. During that 
process, you can explicitly designate which disks get the OS installed 
on them. Removing VxFS is unnecessary.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jim Horalek | 2 Feb 2009 17:25

Re: Storage Foundation limitations in Windows version?

My memory is Veritas did developed vfx for Windows, but it did not provide a
significant improvement in speed or reliablity over ntfs. Veritas choose not
to bring it to market. Who wants to stand up to Microsoft Marketing anyway.

Jim 

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Rich Whiffen
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 5:14 PM
To: Jon Price
Cc: veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Storage Foundation limitations in Windows version?

I think the rational is MS would have to allow Veritas the ability to  
do VxFS on Windows, which I doubt they're inclined to do.  It's  
probably not a matter of Veritas wanting to do it, but more a matter  
of MS allowing them to.  I mean they could release a VxFS for windows  
right now, but there would be no assurances that upcoming patches from  
MS wouldn't break it.

When we use SFW, it's primary function is DMP.  The secondary is the  
better volume control than with LDM (win2k win2k3).  Haven't worked  
with MDM in win2k8.  It also makes mounting volumes with out a drive  
letter easier. In the 5.x versions, you do have flash-snaps, fast file  
resync, and that kind of stuff, which is handy for offline backups of  
exchange stores, for example.  The MSCS support is also pretty good.   
Plus VXVM does much better I/O stats than windows natively does so you  
can get better I/O tuning as well.   It also makes storage management  
uniform across both platforms.

You can make win2k3 boot disks into dynamic disks via SFW but there's  
some caveats and 'gotchas' (clearly documented in the admin guide).   
In win2k8 the boot stuff has changed and it isn't possible (or  
necessary IMHO) to do it via SFW.  The native win2k8 tools are  
sufficient and it keeps the support issues regarding booting under the  
MS umbrella.

So if you're already a Veritas shop, adding windows hosts to the mix  
is a reasonable idea.  If your a windows only shop, it might not make  
as much sense.   If I have one piece of advice, i'd be this: If you  
have any issues that involve storage in any way, open the Veritas  
ticket first, MS second.  It's been my experience that MS will quickly  
plop the ball back into the Veritas court if there is so much as a  
hint of it being a SFW related issue.  2nd, the Veritas folks are  
fairly sharp and can rule out Veritas as the issue fairly quickly so  
you go to MS with a lot of answers in hand.

Cheers,
Rich

On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Jon Price wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> We've used Veritas a lot on Solaris, but trying to find out some
> about Veritas for Windows.
> Looks like it might be very limited.
>
> No Veritas filesystem for Windows. Curious what the rationale is.
>
> Does Veritas Volume Manager for Windows support space-optimized
> snapshots?
> If not, are there other options for creating this type of snapshot?   
> (Veritas or otherwise)
>
> Veritas VM for Windows and the "system disk". Does vxvm handle the
> Windows boot disks?
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx

_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Goutham N | 3 Feb 2009 13:19
Picon

Unattended installation on HP-UX 11.31

Hi,
 
Is VSF 5.0 MP1 supports unattended way of installation of the veritas product suite.  Pl let me know...

N. Gowthaman
<div>
<div>Hi,</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Is VSF 5.0 MP1 supports unattended way of installation of the veritas product suite.&nbsp; Pl let me know...<br clear="all"><br>N. Gowthaman<br>
</div>
</div>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sengor | 5 Feb 2009 12:06
Picon

Re: Query 1

Don't forget to freeze the node persistently.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, i man <imanuk2007 <at> googlemail.com> wrote:

All,

I plan to decomission one node which has a VCS and some disks assigned to VXFS.  The node has to be removed from VCS and then reinstall the OS on the system. VXFS has some disks coming from EMC SAN. Do I need to remove the disks from the VXFS before I reinstall the OS so as to not create any problems on the SAN side. I have switched off all the service groups and removed the node from the VCS cluster already. Also would it be wise to uninstall the VXFS from the node ?

Ciao



_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx




--
sengork
<div>
<p>Don't forget to freeze the node persistently.<br></p>
<p></p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, i man <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:imanuk2007 <at> googlemail.com">imanuk2007 <at> googlemail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<p>All,</p>
<p>I plan to decomission one node which has a VCS and some disks assigned to VXFS.&nbsp; The node has to be removed from VCS and then reinstall the OS on the system. VXFS has some disks coming from EMC SAN. Do I need to remove the disks from the VXFS before I reinstall the OS so as to not create any problems on the SAN side. I have switched off all the service groups and removed the node from the VCS cluster already. Also would it be wise to uninstall the VXFS from the node ?</p>

<p>Ciao</p>
</div>
<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Veritas-vx maillist &nbsp;- &nbsp;<a href="mailto:Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu">Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a><br><a href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx" target="_blank">http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx</a><br><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>sengork<br>
</div>
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Jim Senicka | 5 Feb 2009 13:38
Favicon

Re: Query 1

The node has been removed from the cluster.

Nothing to freeze

 

From: veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Sengor
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 6:06 AM
To: i man
Cc: veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Query 1

 

Don't forget to freeze the node persistently.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, i man <imanuk2007 <at> googlemail.com> wrote:

All,

I plan to decomission one node which has a VCS and some disks assigned to VXFS.  The node has to be removed from VCS and then reinstall the OS on the system. VXFS has some disks coming from EMC SAN. Do I need to remove the disks from the VXFS before I reinstall the OS so as to not create any problems on the SAN side. I have switched off all the service groups and removed the node from the VCS cluster already. Also would it be wise to uninstall the VXFS from the node ?

Ciao



_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx




--
sengork

<div>

<div class="Section1">

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The node has been removed from the cluster.<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Nothing to freeze<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>From:</span><span>
veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Sengor<br>Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 6:06 AM<br>To: i man<br>Cc: veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu<br>Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Query 1<p></p></span></p>

</div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>

<p>Don't forget to freeze the node persistently.<p></p></p>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, i man &lt;<a href="mailto:imanuk2007 <at> googlemail.com">imanuk2007 <at> googlemail.com</a>&gt;
wrote:<p></p></p>

<div>

<p>All,<p></p></p>

<p>I plan to decomission one node which has a VCS and some disks assigned to
VXFS.&nbsp; The node has to be removed from VCS and then reinstall the OS on
the system. VXFS has some disks coming from EMC SAN. Do I need to remove the
disks from the VXFS before I reinstall the OS so as to not create any problems
on the SAN side. I have switched off all the service groups and removed the
node from the VCS cluster already. Also would it be wise to uninstall the VXFS
from the node ?<p></p></p>

<p>Ciao<p></p></p>

</div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Veritas-vx maillist &nbsp;- &nbsp;<a href="mailto:Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu">Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a><br><a href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx" target="_blank">http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx</a><p></p></p>

</div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><br><br clear="all"><br>
-- <br>
sengork<p></p></p>

</div>

</div>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Rich Whiffen | 10 Feb 2009 17:38
Picon

Re: Strange I/O behavior with HP XP 24K array and DMP

Except this is a XP 24k which is a Hitachi variant, so the EVA I/O  
policy isn't applicable here.

I don't have any experience with the XP's myself, but the only two  
times I've seen assymetric I/O like this were hardware issues (SFP/ 
cabling).  Any chance you can look at the port stats for the SAN  
switches?

Also, since you're using the same two HBA's for all I/O given any  
thought to reconfiguring the balancing policy to prefer different  
paths for each array? Basically read on one path, write on the other?   
Some times going slower gets it done faster as strange as that may  
sound.

Rich

On Feb 10, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Ashish Achuthan wrote:

> I/O policy for the EVA should be set to adaptive. This will provide
> shared (balanced) I/O down all paths to the same controller..Also can
> you make sure every other lun is using a different controller?
>
> Example :-
>
>
> /usr/sbin/vxdmpadm setattr path c10t32d2s2 pathtype=primary
> /usr/sbin/vxdmpadm setattr path c10t33d2s2 pathtype=primary
> /usr/sbin/vxdmpadm setattr path c11t32d2s2 pathtype=primary
> /usr/sbin/vxdmpadm setattr path c11t33d2s2 pathtype=primary
> /usr/sbin/vxdmpadm setattr path c10t30d2s2 pathtype=secondary
> /usr/sbin/vxdmpadm setattr path c10t31d2s2 pathtype=secondary
> /usr/sbin/vxdmpadm setattr path c11t30d2s2 pathtype=secondary
> /usr/sbin/vxdmpadm setattr path c11t31d2s2 pathtype=secondary
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Rob Rheault
> <rob.rheault <at> ironmountain.com> wrote:
>> My configuration consists of a Sunfire 6900 running Solaris 9, Emulex
>> LP10000DC HBA's using the leadville driver and the SFK from Sun,  
>> Veritas
>> Storage Foundation 4.1 MP2. We are currently in the processes of  
>> mirroring
>> storage from a IBM DS8000 series array to an HP XP 24K array. I  
>> should also
>> specify that these two arrays are using the same 2 HBA's for I/O. I  
>> have the
>> Veritas recommended ASL loaded for the 24K array and I can see that  
>> it is
>> using it when I run the vxdmpadm commands. The default io policy  
>> for this
>> array is balanced and that is what it is currently set to. However,  
>> when I
>> run vxdmpadm iostat and look at the statistics for a dmpnodename of  
>> a lun on
>> the XP array I can see that it is indeed using both paths to the  
>> lun but
>> what I am seeing is that for example a 26Kb write operation will  
>> take ~8ms
>> down one path and over 200ms down the other path. To me this  
>> screams that
>> something is definitely not setup correctly but according to  
>> Veritas I am
>> using the correct io p! olicy in DMP. Does anyone else have any  
>> experience
>> using the XP 24K array in a similar scenario and are they seeing  
>> the same
>> situation as I have described above? I am wondering if there is  
>> something
>> that I am missing on the host side. Any help would be greatly  
>> appreciated as
>> currently the mirror operation is reporting that it will take 24  
>> hours to
>> mirror a 512GB filesystem.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rob
>>
>>
>> Robert Rheault
>> Senior Systems Engineer, CSG
>> Iron Mountain
>> 745 Atlantic Ave
>> Boston, MA 02111
>> Office: 617-535-8309
>> Cell: 617-729-2713
>> Email: rob.rheault <at> ironmountain.com
>> Visit the new www.ironmountain.com
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> The information contained in this email message and its attachments  
>> is
>> intended only for the private and confidential use of the  
>> recipient(s) named
>> above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission  
>> of email
>> over the Internet is not a secure communications medium. If you are
>> requesting or have requested the transmittal of personal data, as  
>> defined in
>> applicable privacy laws by means of email or in an attachment to  
>> email you
>> must select a more secure alternate means of transmittal that  
>> supports your
>> obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this  
>> message is
>> not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in  
>> error, you
>> must take no action based on the information in this email and you  
>> are
>> hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse, copying, or  
>> disclosure of
>> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and  
>> delete the
>> original message.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Hudes, Dana | 10 Feb 2009 19:32

Re: Storage Foundation limitations in Windows version?

Microsoft actually use Veritas technology here and there. The shadow
copy feature is Veritas. It says so.

=================
Dana Hudes
UNIX and Imaging group
NYC-HRA MIS
+1 718 510 8586
Nextel:  172*26*16684
=================

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jim
Horalek
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 11:25 AM
To: 'Rich Whiffen'; 'Jon Price'
Cc: veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Storage Foundation limitations in Windows
version?

My memory is Veritas did developed vfx for Windows, but it did not
provide a significant improvement in speed or reliablity over ntfs.
Veritas choose not to bring it to market. Who wants to stand up to
Microsoft Marketing anyway.

Jim 

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Rich
Whiffen
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 5:14 PM
To: Jon Price
Cc: veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Storage Foundation limitations in Windows
version?

I think the rational is MS would have to allow Veritas the ability to do
VxFS on Windows, which I doubt they're inclined to do.  It's probably
not a matter of Veritas wanting to do it, but more a matter of MS
allowing them to.  I mean they could release a VxFS for windows right
now, but there would be no assurances that upcoming patches from MS
wouldn't break it.

When we use SFW, it's primary function is DMP.  The secondary is the
better volume control than with LDM (win2k win2k3).  Haven't worked with
MDM in win2k8.  It also makes mounting volumes with out a drive letter
easier. In the 5.x versions, you do have flash-snaps, fast file resync,
and that kind of stuff, which is handy for offline backups of  
exchange stores, for example.  The MSCS support is also pretty good.   
Plus VXVM does much better I/O stats than windows natively does so you  
can get better I/O tuning as well.   It also makes storage management  
uniform across both platforms.

You can make win2k3 boot disks into dynamic disks via SFW but there's  
some caveats and 'gotchas' (clearly documented in the admin guide).   
In win2k8 the boot stuff has changed and it isn't possible (or necessary
IMHO) to do it via SFW.  The native win2k8 tools are sufficient and it
keeps the support issues regarding booting under the MS umbrella.

So if you're already a Veritas shop, adding windows hosts to the mix is
a reasonable idea.  If your a windows only shop, it might not make  
as much sense.   If I have one piece of advice, i'd be this: If you  
have any issues that involve storage in any way, open the Veritas ticket
first, MS second.  It's been my experience that MS will quickly plop the
ball back into the Veritas court if there is so much as a hint of it
being a SFW related issue.  2nd, the Veritas folks are fairly sharp and
can rule out Veritas as the issue fairly quickly so you go to MS with a
lot of answers in hand.

Cheers,
Rich

On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Jon Price wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> We've used Veritas a lot on Solaris, but trying to find out some about

> Veritas for Windows.
> Looks like it might be very limited.
>
> No Veritas filesystem for Windows. Curious what the rationale is.
>
> Does Veritas Volume Manager for Windows support space-optimized 
> snapshots?
> If not, are there other options for creating this type of snapshot?   
> (Veritas or otherwise)
>
> Veritas VM for Windows and the "system disk". Does vxvm handle the 
> Windows boot disks?
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx

_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx

_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sengor | 11 Feb 2009 01:05
Picon

Re: Help required in VCS cluster configuration

Make use of the documnetation: http://sfdoccentral.symantec.com/

Make use of the cluster simulator: http://www.symantec.com/business/products/utilities.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&pvid=20_1

Check compatibility matrices: http://www.symantec.com/business/support/documentation.jsp?language=english&view=comp&pid=15066


On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:01 AM, alok tiwari <alok.20jan <at> gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Andrey,
 
I do not much about VCS , however I am well versed with VxVM.
I only know the basic concepts and have a understanding of cluster configuration like Quorum etc.
I do not think that we can afford to hire any consultant or the VCS configuration.
Do anyhaves some docs which containes some Peoplessoft specific cluster config details.
 
I will be highly thankful.
 
Regards
Alok

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Andrey Dmitriev <admitriev <at> mentora.com> wrote:

Documentation is available on Symatec's site.

 

If you don't know anything about a product, I strongly suggest some training, and/or consultant help.

 

-andrey

 

From: veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of alok tiwari
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:16 PM
To: veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] Help required in VCS cluster configuration

 

Hi All,

 

I am going to do a VCS install and configuration. The cluster will run peoplesoft application and oracle database.

 

I will be thankful if any one please sends me any manual or docs. I will be also thankful , if they can share any docs or issues faced when they have done the same.

 

Thanks again. Waiting for some help.
--
With Regards:-
Alok T




--
With Regards:-
Alok Tiwari
09819733350

_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx




--
sengork
<div>
<p>Make use of the documnetation: <a href="http://sfdoccentral.symantec.com/">http://sfdoccentral.symantec.com/</a></p>
<p>Make use of the cluster simulator: <a href="http://www.symantec.com/business/products/utilities.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&amp;pvid=20_1">http://www.symantec.com/business/products/utilities.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&amp;pvid=20_1</a><br></p>
<p>Check compatibility matrices: <a href="http://www.symantec.com/business/support/documentation.jsp?language=english&amp;view=comp&amp;pid=15066">http://www.symantec.com/business/support/documentation.jsp?language=english&amp;view=comp&amp;pid=15066</a></p>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:01 AM, alok tiwari <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:alok.20jan <at> gmail.com">alok.20jan <at> gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div>Hi Andrey,</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>I do not much about VCS , however I am well versed with VxVM.</div>
<div>I only know the basic concepts and have a understanding of cluster configuration like Quorum etc.</div>
<div>I do not think that we can afford to hire any consultant or the VCS configuration. </div>
<div>Do anyhaves some docs which containes some Peoplessoft specific cluster config details.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>I will be highly thankful.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div>Alok<br><br>
</div>
<div><div class="Wj3C7c">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Andrey Dmitriev <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:admitriev <at> mentora.com" target="_blank">admitriev <at> mentora.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div lang="EN-US" vlink="purple" link="blue">
<div>
<p><span>Documentation is available on Symatec's site.</span></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>If you don't know anything about a product, I strongly suggest some training, and/or consultant help.</span></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>-andrey</span></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<div>
<p><span>From:</span><span> <a href="mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu" target="_blank">veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu" target="_blank">veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a>] On Behalf Of alok tiwari<br>Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:16 PM<br>To: <a href="mailto:veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu" target="_blank">veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a><br>Subject: [Veritas-vx] Help required in VCS cluster configuration</span></p>

</div>
<div>

<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<p>Hi All,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>I am going to do a VCS install and configuration. The cluster will run peoplesoft application and oracle database.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>I will be thankful if any one please sends me any manual or docs. I will be also thankful , if they can share any docs or issues faced when they have done the same.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Thanks again. Waiting for some help.<br>-- <br>With Regards:-<br>Alok T</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br><br clear="all"><br>
</div></div>-- <br>With Regards:-<br>Alok Tiwari<br>
09819733350<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Veritas-vx maillist &nbsp;- &nbsp;<a href="mailto:Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu">Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a><br><a href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx" target="_blank">http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx</a><br><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>sengork<br>
</div>
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Sengor | 11 Feb 2009 07:06
Picon

Re: Help required in VCS cluster configuration


One more thing:   https://vias.symantec.com/main.php

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Sengor <sengork <at> gmail.com> wrote:

Make use of the documnetation: http://sfdoccentral.symantec.com/

Make use of the cluster simulator: http://www.symantec.com/business/products/utilities.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&pvid=20_1

Check compatibility matrices: http://www.symantec.com/business/support/documentation.jsp?language=english&view=comp&pid=15066


On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:01 AM, alok tiwari <alok.20jan <at> gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Andrey,
 
I do not much about VCS , however I am well versed with VxVM.
I only know the basic concepts and have a understanding of cluster configuration like Quorum etc.
I do not think that we can afford to hire any consultant or the VCS configuration.
Do anyhaves some docs which containes some Peoplessoft specific cluster config details.
 
I will be highly thankful.
 
Regards
Alok

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Andrey Dmitriev <admitriev <at> mentora.com> wrote:

Documentation is available on Symatec's site.

 

If you don't know anything about a product, I strongly suggest some training, and/or consultant help.

 

-andrey

 

From: veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of alok tiwari
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:16 PM
To: veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] Help required in VCS cluster configuration

 

Hi All,

 

I am going to do a VCS install and configuration. The cluster will run peoplesoft application and oracle database.

 

I will be thankful if any one please sends me any manual or docs. I will be also thankful , if they can share any docs or issues faced when they have done the same.

 

Thanks again. Waiting for some help.
--
With Regards:-
Alok T




--
With Regards:-
Alok Tiwari
09819733350

_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist  -  Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx




--
sengork



--
sengork
<div>
<br><p>One more thing: &nbsp; <a href="https://vias.symantec.com/main.php">https://vias.symantec.com/main.php</a><br></p>
<p></p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Sengor <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:sengork <at> gmail.com">sengork <at> gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<p>Make use of the documnetation: <a href="http://sfdoccentral.symantec.com/" target="_blank">http://sfdoccentral.symantec.com/</a></p>
<p>Make use of the cluster simulator: <a href="http://www.symantec.com/business/products/utilities.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&amp;pvid=20_1" target="_blank">http://www.symantec.com/business/products/utilities.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&amp;pvid=20_1</a><br></p>
<p>Check compatibility matrices: <a href="http://www.symantec.com/business/support/documentation.jsp?language=english&amp;view=comp&amp;pid=15066" target="_blank">http://www.symantec.com/business/support/documentation.jsp?language=english&amp;view=comp&amp;pid=15066</a></p>

<br><div class="gmail_quote">
<div>
<div class="Wj3C7c">On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:01 AM, alok tiwari <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:alok.20jan <at> gmail.com" target="_blank">alok.20jan <at> gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div><div class="Wj3C7c">
<div>Hi Andrey,</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>I do not much about VCS , however I am well versed with VxVM.</div>
<div>I only know the basic concepts and have a understanding of cluster configuration like Quorum etc.</div>
<div>I do not think that we can afford to hire any consultant or the VCS configuration. </div>
<div>Do anyhaves some docs which containes some Peoplessoft specific cluster config details.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>I will be highly thankful.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div>Alok<br><br>
</div>
<div><div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Andrey Dmitriev <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:admitriev <at> mentora.com" target="_blank">admitriev <at> mentora.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div lang="EN-US" vlink="purple" link="blue">
<div>
<p><span>Documentation is available on Symatec's site.</span></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>If you don't know anything about a product, I strongly suggest some training, and/or consultant help.</span></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>-andrey</span></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<div>
<p><span>From:</span><span> <a href="mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu" target="_blank">veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu" target="_blank">veritas-vx-bounces <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a>] On Behalf Of alok tiwari<br>Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:16 PM<br>To: <a href="mailto:veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu" target="_blank">veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a><br>Subject: [Veritas-vx] Help required in VCS cluster configuration</span></p>

</div>
<div>

<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<p>Hi All,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>I am going to do a VCS install and configuration. The cluster will run peoplesoft application and oracle database.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>I will be thankful if any one please sends me any manual or docs. I will be also thankful , if they can share any docs or issues faced when they have done the same.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Thanks again. Waiting for some help.<br>-- <br>With Regards:-<br>Alok T</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br><br clear="all"><br>
</div></div>-- <br>With Regards:-<br>Alok Tiwari<br>

09819733350<br><br>
</div></div>
<div class="Ih2E3d">_______________________________________________<br>
Veritas-vx maillist &nbsp;- &nbsp;<a href="mailto:Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu" target="_blank">Veritas-vx <at> mailman.eng.auburn.edu</a><br><a href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx" target="_blank">http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx</a><br><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>sengork<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>sengork<br>
</div>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane