1 Jan 2012 01:10
Re: OS9 vs Flex
On 1/01/2012 7:20 AM, john dumas wrote: > On 12/31/2011 11:02 AM, Frank Swygert wrote: >> Hmmm... I seem to recall Frank Hogg's articels saying that Flex was >> at least multi-user, if not multi-tasking. Seems like one would have >> to go with the other, but it's possible that each user could only run >> one task at a time instead of many... I don't recall enough!! Need to >> find one of Hogg's Rainbow articles/ads... > Been looking at the source code for SWTP 6809 Flex this past year. I > can see no way that more than > one user could be using it at once. As others have said. it looks like > a CP/M for '00 & '09. > > No concept of user login at all. One terminal. Single tasking - no > scheduler, Flex or the > program (singular) it launches owns the entire machine............etc > > Cheers, > johnd > There is interrupt driven printer spooling. The disk drivers set the interrupt flag so that the interrupts won't interrupt the disk read/write sector operations. John. -- -- http://www.johnkent.com.au http://members.optusnet.com.au/jekent(Continue reading)
--
Coco mailing list
RSS Feed