1 Feb 2012 16:08
Cebit 2012, 06 to 10 March
Bari Ari <bari <at> onelabs.com>
2012-02-01 15:08:19 GMT
2012-02-01 15:08:19 GMT
Anyone going? http://www.cebit.de/home Maybe we can have some eoma68 cards ready to show by then.
1 Feb 2012 20:20
Re: Cebit 2012, 06 to 10 March
lkcl luke <luke.leighton <at> gmail.com>
2012-02-01 19:20:35 GMT
2012-02-01 19:20:35 GMT
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Bari Ari <bari <at> onelabs.com> wrote: > Anyone going? > > http://www.cebit.de/home > > Maybe we can have some eoma68 cards ready to show by then. ooo that'd be good.
2 Feb 2012 11:55
Re: What Does 6 Years and $109M Get You?
Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle <at> tamay-dogan.net>
2012-02-02 10:55:31 GMT
2012-02-02 10:55:31 GMT
Hello Bari Ari, Am 2012-01-31 13:43:37, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > Tilera ships 36- and 16-core RISC processors > http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Tilera-TileGx36-and-TileGx16/ > > 1GHz to 1.5GHz > 10 to 55 Watts > TSMC's 40-nanometer (nm) process > > CoreMark score 165,000 > http://www.coremark.org/benchmark/index.php > > TILE-Gx Processor Family > http://www.tilera.com/products/processors/TILE-Gx_Family Killer! The Gx16 would be enough for me to transform it into a Server... Unfortunately I have not found any prices... Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack -- -- ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux Internet Service Provider, Cloud Computing <http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/>(Continue reading)
4 Feb 2012 16:47
Mali at fosdem
Justin Cormack <justin <at> specialbusservice.com>
2012-02-04 15:47:45 GMT
2012-02-04 15:47:45 GMT
The initial Mali code is at http://limadriver.org/
Lots of work to do but looking good so far.
Justin
<div> <p>The initial Mali code is at <a href="http://limadriver.org/">http://limadriver.org/</a></p> <p>Lots of work to do but looking good so far.</p> <p>Justin<br></p> </div>
4 Feb 2012 17:08
Re: Mali at fosdem
lkcl luke <luke.leighton <at> gmail.com>
2012-02-04 16:08:52 GMT
2012-02-04 16:08:52 GMT
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Justin Cormack <justin <at> specialbusservice.com> wrote: > The initial Mali code is at http://limadriver.org/ where? can't see it! https://gitorious.org/lima but... no, no links saying "git clone ...." l.
4 Feb 2012 17:16
Re: Mali at fosdem
Alejandro Mery <amery <at> geeks.cl>
2012-02-04 16:16:27 GMT
2012-02-04 16:16:27 GMT
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 17:08, lkcl luke <luke.leighton <at> gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Justin Cormack > <justin <at> specialbusservice.com> wrote: > > The initial Mali code is at http://limadriver.org/ > > where? can't see it! https://gitorious.org/lima but... no, no links > saying "git clone ...." "In order to keep things manageable, no code will be made available until shortly after FOSDEM 2012, where the Lima driver project will be officially announced." -- http://limadriver.org/ _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook <at> lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook <at> files.phcomp.co.uk
4 Feb 2012 18:17
Re: Mali at fosdem
lkcl luke <luke.leighton <at> gmail.com>
2012-02-04 17:17:59 GMT
2012-02-04 17:17:59 GMT
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Alejandro Mery <amery <at> geeks.cl> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 17:08, lkcl luke <luke.leighton <at> gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Justin Cormack >> <justin <at> specialbusservice.com> wrote: >> > The initial Mali code is at http://limadriver.org/ >> >> where? can't see it! https://gitorious.org/lima but... no, no links >> saying "git clone ...." > > > "In order to keep things manageable, no code will be made available > until shortly after FOSDEM 2012, where the Lima driver project will be > officially announced." -- http://limadriver.org/ ahh that explains it. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook <at> lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook <at> files.phcomp.co.uk
6 Feb 2012 00:10
Re: EOMA68 pinout change may be needed
Phill Rogers <PhillRogers <at> JerseyMail.co.uk>
2012-02-05 23:10:23 GMT
2012-02-05 23:10:23 GMT
Hi, newbie alert (in this forum) so sorry if this has been covered. Why not just use PoE ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet Even if the host device doesn't use Ethernet, or the user doesn't have a PoE switch, you can still use a 'power brick' to inject the power onto the Ethernet pins. Probably still makes sense to have at least one real 5v pin in any case.
6 Feb 2012 00:43
Re: EOMA68 pinout change may be needed
lkcl luke <luke.leighton <at> gmail.com>
2012-02-05 23:43:31 GMT
2012-02-05 23:43:31 GMT
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Phill Rogers <PhillRogers <at> jerseymail.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, newbie alert (in this forum) so sorry if this has been covered. allo newbie in this forum :) > Why not just use PoE ? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet > > Even if the host device doesn't use Ethernet, or the user doesn't have a PoE > switch, you can still use a 'power brick' to inject the power onto the Ethernet > pins. > > Probably still makes sense to have at least one real 5v pin in any case. i'm inclined to say that if POE is needed, it should be on the motherboard, even if that motherboard is about 56mm long and 25mm deep. the reason for that is the extra cost of the components in cases where POE is *not* required (or used) would potentially make a mass-volume product uncompetitive or unprofitable. if it's actually in the _standard_ that POE is required (no, standards *must* not have anything that is "optional" in them), then that would potentially jeapordise the entire project. EOMA is about covering as much as possible with "Lowest Common Denominator" interfaces that have downwards / upwards compatibility built in to those standards, already. so, yes, 10/100/1000 ethernet is ok, because if you connect an 8-wire socket to a 4-wire plug (or vice-versa), ethernet auto-negotiation kicks in. likewise for SATA and USB: the standards auto-negotiate the fastest possible data transfer rate (yes i've explicity said on the standards page that USB2 480mb/sec *only* CPU cards are banned). surprisingly, the bar is extremely high (on the Lowest-Common-Denominator) thanks to that auto-negotiation. but adding things like POE? naah. can't do it. l.
6 Feb 2012 01:00
Re: EOMA68 pinout change may be needed
Henrik Nordström <henrik <at> henriknordstrom.net>
2012-02-06 00:00:47 GMT
2012-02-06 00:00:47 GMT
sön 2012-02-05 klockan 23:10 +0000 skrev Phill Rogers: > Hi, newbie alert (in this forum) so sorry if this has been covered. > > Why not just use PoE ? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet Because a) Requires a PoE source. b) Requires a fairly tolerant DC-DC power supply to make useable voltages out of it in a safe manner. PoE is by no means a clean and nice power source at convenient voltage. c) Requires an Ethernet jack. We currently have Ethernet on the EOMA connector only. 5V DC input is much simpler to work with, and more readily available in the types of components we work with here. I.e. the power management chip companion to A10 has everything builtin for dealing with a reasonably stable 5V power source such as USB. Please note that there is nothing that stops building a chassis for the EOMA card that accepts PoE and powers the card from it via a suitable DC-DC converter to 5V. Regards Henrik _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook <at> lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook <at> files.phcomp.co.uk
RSS Feed