Funny NYPD | 1 Jun 01:11
Picon
Favicon

Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices

That's why Vista will be the history very soon.

 Funny N.
Au Group Electronics, http://www.AuElectronics.com

________________________________
From: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc <at> gmail.com>
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist <at> mit.edu>
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 6:52:58 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Chris McSweeny <cpmcsweeny <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Youda He <youda <at> geometrysystems.com>wrote:
>
>>  We can't even
>> install VC2003 on Vista, so we can only run the compiled binary, not the
>> compiler.
>>
>
> Really? I'm running VC++ 6.0 on Vista. It's not supposed to work, but it
> does. Granted I've only tried compiling fairly simple stuff, but even so
> I've yet to actually find an issue!

It is true you can probably install VC++ 2003 on Vista but there are
major problems like debugging. Not so sure about VC++ 6.
http://www.techtalkz.com/vc-net/302166-how-speed-up-visual-studio-2003-vista.html

Even installing .Net 1.1 is troublesome in Vista.
http://mcuee.blogspot.com/2009/04/microsoft-net-framework-11-installation.html

(Continue reading)

Xiaofan Chen | 1 Jun 01:20
Picon

Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Funny NYPD <funnynypd <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
> That's why Vista will be the history very soon.

Not for me. ;-)
I am using a Vista 32 desktop now and I think
it is fine. There are older programs which do not work,
so I just move on. Most the MCU companies now
support Vista 32.

-- 
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
--

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

Youda He | 1 Jun 01:27

Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices

We tried install VC2003 in Vista, the problems is with VC2003, Vista does
not add any value, only trouble.

VC2008 has some optimization, like open mp support, more CPU specific
optimization (all in floating point operations), and SSE supports.

We want to optimize the code to have faster floating point operations,
possibly using SSE, and definitely multiprocessor support, since the
dual/quad core cpus are everywhere.

-- Youda

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Chris McSweeny <cpmcsweeny <at> gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Youda He <youda <at> geometrysystems.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>  We can't even
> >> install VC2003 on Vista, so we can only run the compiled binary, not the
> >> compiler.
> >>
> >
> > Really? I'm running VC++ 6.0 on Vista. It's not supposed to work, but it
> > does. Granted I've only tried compiling fairly simple stuff, but even so
> > I've yet to actually find an issue!
>
> It is true you can probably install VC++ 2003 on Vista but there are
> major problems like debugging. Not so sure about VC++ 6.
(Continue reading)

Funny NYPD | 1 Jun 01:40
Picon
Favicon

Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices

We have one machine came in with a Vista pro pre-installed. We found it was hard to use, and downgrade to XP
SP2/3 and never touched a Vista again.
Agree, the vista eye-catching style is really cool.

 Funny N.
Au Group Electronics, http://www.AuElectronics.com

________________________________
From: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc <at> gmail.com>
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist <at> mit.edu>
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 7:20:10 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Funny NYPD <funnynypd <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
> That's why Vista will be the history very soon.

Not for me. ;-)
I am using a Vista 32 desktop now and I think
it is fine. There are older programs which do not work,
so I just move on. Most the MCU companies now
support Vista 32.

-- 
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
--

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

      
(Continue reading)

Xiaofan Chen | 1 Jun 01:53
Picon

Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Funny NYPD <funnynypd <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
> We have one machine came in with a Vista pro pre-installed. We found it
> was hard to use, and downgrade to XP SP2/3 and never touched a Vista again.

Probably. Vista has many things gone wrong but the underline technology
is actually quite good. Windows 7 shares the same technology and tries
to address the issues and it seems that it will regain the interests
of the business users.

> Agree, the vista eye-catching style is really cool.

I do not care for the eye-catching features. In fact, KDE 4.2 under Linux
 is even more eye-catching but I have not used it for a short while, still feel
the plain Gnome is faster and more stable. ;-)

-- 
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
--

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

solarwind | 1 Jun 03:01
Picon

Re: [PIC] Clock for PIC Controller

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 5:45 PM, ru12 <support2009 <at> dontronics.com> wrote:
> wackytacky wrote:
>>
>> I am fairly new to using microcontrollers, and I would like to program one
>> to do something for me at certain times of the day. How can I incorporate
>> a clock to control when my microcontroller will perform those tasks?
>>
>> Thanks!

Use an RTC (real time clock) chip. Maxim-IC sells and samples them.
Get your free samples.
--

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

Vitaliy | 1 Jun 05:03

Re: [PIC] Clock for PIC Controller

Jinx wrote:
> Just curious - lately I'm not seeing several post originals. See the
> replies, obviously

I did not see the OP, either. Maybe wackytacky sent the message directly to 
Don?

Vitaliy 

--

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

Picon

Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices


On May 31, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:

>> That's why Vista will be the history very soon.
>
> Not for me. ;-)
> I am using a Vista 32 desktop now and I think
> it is fine. There are older programs which do not work,
> so I just move on.

With that general attitude, what will stop you from going to Windows 7  
when it comes out ?

BillW

--

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

solarwind | 1 Jun 05:23
Picon

Re: [PIC] Clock for PIC Controller

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Vitaliy <spam <at> maksimov.org> wrote:
> I did not see the OP, either. Maybe wackytacky sent the message directly to
> Don?
>
> Vitaliy

It's from nabble.
--

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

Xiaofan Chen | 1 Jun 05:44
Picon

Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:10 AM, William "Chops" Westfield
<westfw <at> mac.com> wrote:
>>> That's why Vista will be the history very soon.
>>
>> Not for me. ;-)
>> I am using a Vista 32 desktop now and I think
>> it is fine. There are older programs which do not work,
>> so I just move on.
>
> With that general attitude, what will stop you from going to Windows 7
> when it comes out ?
>

If I am going to buy my next PC, it will be Windows 7. No technical hurdel
will stop this as I am a "pro" user of Windows. But my wife does have a say
when we will buy the next PC. ;-)

I always like to be current with Windows and Linux. I always use the
latest Ubuntu as my primary Linux distro.

-- 
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
--

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist


Gmane