1 Jun 01:11
Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices
Funny NYPD <funnynypd <at> yahoo.com>
2009-05-31 23:11:35 GMT
2009-05-31 23:11:35 GMT
That's why Vista will be the history very soon. Funny N. Au Group Electronics, http://www.AuElectronics.com ________________________________ From: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc <at> gmail.com> To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist <at> mit.edu> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 6:52:58 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Windows Development Choices On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Chris McSweeny <cpmcsweeny <at> gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Youda He <youda <at> geometrysystems.com>wrote: > >> We can't even >> install VC2003 on Vista, so we can only run the compiled binary, not the >> compiler. >> > > Really? I'm running VC++ 6.0 on Vista. It's not supposed to work, but it > does. Granted I've only tried compiling fairly simple stuff, but even so > I've yet to actually find an issue! It is true you can probably install VC++ 2003 on Vista but there are major problems like debugging. Not so sure about VC++ 6. http://www.techtalkz.com/vc-net/302166-how-speed-up-visual-studio-2003-vista.html Even installing .Net 1.1 is troublesome in Vista. http://mcuee.blogspot.com/2009/04/microsoft-net-framework-11-installation.html(Continue reading)
I am using a Vista 32 desktop now and I think
it is fine. There are older programs which do not work,
so I just move on. Most the MCU companies now
support Vista 32.
--
Xiaofan
RSS Feed