Re: /media/ram on c7x0 machines
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <mickey <at> tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de>
2005-06-01 10:09:15 GMT
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 11:50 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > In general: Could you please stop distinguishing the "familiar" people
> > and the "openzaurus" people? I thought we agreed that we are one
> > community and the only differences are a couple of people having just
> > one target device.
> The question about a /media/ram affects more than one device. We need a
> policy for stuff like that, and that policy should be distro
> independant. That's is going to be hard if you insist on using the OZ
> list for that. Maybe the nslu2 people like the idea, maybe they don't,
> but your shutting them out.
True enough, however my particular annoyance was raised by the fact
_how_ the change was introduced. 1st) by someone which wasn't very
prominently active in the community until now and 2nd) only for one
particular device. Considering both facts the it looked wrong just to
apply that changeset - a bit more open discussion and thinking was
> On handhelds.org we have familiar <at> , familiar-dev <at> *and* ipaq <at> . You get 3
> guesses where ipaq related questions should go to.
Actually I am subscribed to the familiar list and I see a lot of ipaq
specific questions there.
> If you refuse to discuss MACHINE related items on the OE list I get the
> idea you don't want to merge. Let's work *together* and discuss OE stuff
> in a central place. For now that place is oe <at> . Integration, not segregation.