2 Oct 2006 10:37
2 Oct 2006 16:15
Re: Hello+help with screen orientation?
Florian Boor <boor <at> unix-ag.org>
2006-10-02 14:15:13 GMT
2006-10-02 14:15:13 GMT
Hi Michael, Michael Cloran wrote: > Hello my name is Michael and I am an idle Telecommunications Engineer and > enjoy Linux. I am interested in getting the universal working I am a > beginner/intermediate user of Linux and am willing to help if possible with > this project. great, help is always welcome! > I have intermediate knowledge of C > > firstly does anyone know how to set the orientation of the screen to > landscape via the console the GUI does not seem to allow this option and is > it possible to get touchscreen working on GPE. Screen rotation works with the xrandr tool, something like "xrandr -o left". I remember touchscreen was working on the Universal some time ago, but the calibration tool failed. Greetings Florian -- -- The dream of yesterday Florian Boor is the hope of today Tel: 0271-7411487 and the reality of tomorrow. boor <at> unix-ag.org [Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904] florian.boor <at> bsystems.de(Continue reading)
2 Oct 2006 20:17
Re: touchscreen initialisation script??
Justin Patrin <papercrane <at> gmail.com>
2006-10-02 18:17:46 GMT
2006-10-02 18:17:46 GMT
On 10/2/06, Michael Cloran <michaelcloran <at> o2.ie> wrote: > Hi > does anyone know where the touchscreen initialisation script is because the touchscreen did work and now it doesnt I have tried a reinstall but no luck. > One of them is called xtscal, I'm not sure if it's still used or for your architecture, though... -- -- Justin Patrin
3 Oct 2006 05:50
altboot issue after fresh install
Spiros Kapetanakis <spizkapa <at> gmail.com>
2006-10-03 03:50:28 GMT
2006-10-03 03:50:28 GMT
Hi folks, first, apologies if you see this message twice. I originally sent it to openzaurus-users but it bounced back complaining about mail server issues. Since I use GPE, I thought someone on this list may be able to help instead. I'm sure someone will have seen this one before but I searched the list and came up with nothing. I've been trying the resurrect my collie. I flashed my 5500 with OZ 3.5.4 / GPE 2.7 from one of the mirrors (checked the md5s, they're OK) and it installed fine. I booted into the system and all was good. I then copied the gpe-image-3.5.4-collie.rootfs.tar.gz and opie-image-3.5.4-collie.rootfs.tar.gz files onto my SD card (which has worked before with OZ) and tried to go into advanced->install from tar.gz in the altboot menus. The first time I tried it, it failed daying that it's unable to mount the SD card. I tried again and it then consistently said that insmod failed while loading. I guessing here that it's the SD driver loading that's failing. I was under the impression that 3.5.4 worked on the collie with SD card, it was only the 3.5.4.X series that has the 2.6 kernel and hence no SD support for the collie. Is that right? Does anyone know how I can get my Z to run from SD card with altboot? Many thanks.(Continue reading)
3 Oct 2006 06:59
RE: FW: Gpe on GTK-DirectFB
Raju S N <rajusn <at> huawei.com>
2006-10-03 04:59:37 GMT
2006-10-03 04:59:37 GMT
Hello! Thanx for your response. We saw the gtkperf statistics with 2.10/2.6 and we are considering 2.6 on DirectFB as it is fast. So, can any of you tell how much effort it takes to port GPE applications like calendar and PIM applications onto GTK 2.6 -Directfb. What kind of issues can come up for this. Thanx in advance. Raju -----Original Message----- From: gpe-bounces <at> handhelds.org [mailto:gpe-bounces <at> handhelds.org] On Behalf Of falls huang Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 4:24 PM To: gpe <at> handhelds.org Subject: Re: FW: [Gpe] Gpe on GTK-DirectFB Hello! I think there is no need to run GPE on gtk+ 2.10 directfb : 1. gtk+2.10 is more slower than gtk+2.6 , you can use GtkPerf to test the speed of 2.10/2.6. (http://mail.gnome.org/archives/performance-list/2006-July/msg00084.html) 2. According to my experience , gtk-x11 need about 4M sdram more than gtk-directfb, most of the linux based smartphones/pdas have 64M sdram(Continue reading)
3 Oct 2006 14:02
ipkg dependency problems
Neil Williams <linux <at> codehelp.co.uk>
2006-10-03 12:02:06 GMT
2006-10-03 12:02:06 GMT
I'm trying to test gpe-expenses on my iPAQ (h3900) prior to the first release. I'm unable to build anything in the familiar-build using bitbake and OE on amd64 and I am also unable to build the entire gpe-image on i386 using OE itself. I don't have sufficient disc space on i386 to build both the OE and familiar-build trees. I am only able to build certain components of GPE via OE on i386. I've created working .bb files for the necessary packages and the packages build OK when called directly. My problem is dependencies. The i386 OE build has led to .ipk files that are well in advance of Familiar 0.84 library versions - libglib-2.0 is 2.12 when the iPAQ has 2.6. That was OK, I built libglib-2.0 and upgraded. libqof1_0.7.2 is now installed on my 0.84 Familiar iPAQ. When I tried to install gpe-expenses, the Gtk and libgpewidget dependencies were just too many to try upgrading (and risking breakage elsewhere). The disparity can only come from the build environment - the code itself does not require the v.latest Gtk related libraries. Can I pin the OE build to certain dependencies? gpe-expenses is currently unreleased because I want to make sure the code actually works! However, current CVS builds correctly and I'm using this bitbake file with the target of 'make dist' from CVS: $ cat gpe-expenses_0.0.6.bb LICENCE = "GPL" PR = "r0"(Continue reading)
3 Oct 2006 16:04
Data collation and multisync
Neil Williams <linux <at> codehelp.co.uk>
2006-10-03 14:04:36 GMT
2006-10-03 14:04:36 GMT
1. I'd be interested in packaging gpe-multisync for Debian IF a complete build environment (with configure.ac and Makefile.am) was available rather than patching an existing Makefile, plus the usual paraphenalia of ChangeLog, COPYING etc. I don't mind doing this myself - autoscan would do most of the work - if I have access. There'd need to be some kind of upstream "project home" with CVS/svn/foo - it's not too small for SourceForge (it's not going to be any smaller than gpe-expenses which is already in SF). 1a : Do the three tarballs need to be separate? Can they be produced from a single upstream home? 2. Just how does it sync with Palm PDA's? I have a utility that can do this if gpe-multisync would output XML. (The XML provided by glib-2.0 would probably be fine, I'll handle the XSL from that, there may be no need for libxml2.) 3. What's involved in extending it to other data sources (like gpe-expenses)? 4. Can it (be extended to) support data collation? e.g. To prepare an invoice, I need to cross-reference Calendar (where I worked / for whom I worked) with Contacts (who to bill for the work) and Expenses (what I spent). I'd prefer to retrieve that data as a single data set, rather than syncing with three separate databases. Alternatively, should I create a "collation" utility for installation on the iPAQ to interface directly with the sqlite databases of contacts, calendar and my own expenses? (If it's my own, it would use libqof1 to handle the queries required to match data from one utility with data from another.) I could conceivably work it from a simple sqlite dump from the iPAQ to(Continue reading)
3 Oct 2006 23:56
Re: altboot issue after fresh install
Justin Patrin <papercrane <at> gmail.com>
2006-10-03 21:56:36 GMT
2006-10-03 21:56:36 GMT
On 10/2/06, Spiros Kapetanakis <spizkapa <at> gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > first, apologies if you see this message twice. I originally sent it > to openzaurus-users but it bounced back complaining about mail server > issues. Since I use GPE, I thought someone on this list may be able to > help instead. > > I'm sure someone will have seen this one before but I searched the > list and came up with nothing. I've been trying the resurrect my > collie. > > I flashed my 5500 with OZ 3.5.4 / GPE 2.7 from one of the mirrors > (checked the md5s, they're OK) and it installed fine. I booted into > the system and all was good. > > I then copied the gpe-image-3.5.4-collie.rootfs.tar.gz and > opie-image-3.5.4-collie.rootfs.tar.gz files onto my SD card (which has > worked before with OZ) and tried to go into advanced->install from > tar.gz in the altboot menus. The first time I tried it, it failed > daying that it's unable to mount the SD card. I tried again and it > then consistently said that insmod failed while loading. I guessing > here that it's the SD driver loading that's failing. > > I was under the impression that 3.5.4 worked on the collie with SD > card, it was only the 3.5.4.X series that has the 2.6 kernel and hence > no SD support for the collie. Is that right? > Use the newest one that doesn't have a 2.6 kernel. IIRC only(Continue reading)
4 Oct 2006 23:04
Re: altboot issue after fresh install
Florian Boor <boor <at> unix-ag.org>
2006-10-04 21:04:45 GMT
2006-10-04 21:04:45 GMT
Hi, Spiros Kapetanakis wrote: > Hi folks, > > first, apologies if you see this message twice. I originally sent it > to openzaurus-users but it bounced back complaining about mail server > issues. Since I use GPE, I thought someone on this list may be able to > help instead. well.. maybe someone here knows, but an altboot issue would be definitley a topic for an OpenZaurus mailinglist. Greetings Florian -- -- The dream of yesterday Florian Boor is the hope of today Tel: 0271-7411487 and the reality of tomorrow. boor <at> unix-ag.org [Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904] florian.boor <at> bsystems.de 6C 44 30 4C 43 20 6B 61 16 07 0F AA E6 97 70 A8
4 Oct 2006 23:09
Re: FW: Gpe on GTK-DirectFB
Florian Boor <florian.boor <at> kernelconcepts.de>
2006-10-04 21:09:23 GMT
2006-10-04 21:09:23 GMT
Hi, Raju S N wrote: > Thanx for your response. We saw the gtkperf statistics with 2.10/2.6 and we > are considering 2.6 on DirectFB as it is fast. So, can any of you tell how > much effort it takes to port GPE applications like calendar and PIM > applications onto GTK 2.6 -Directfb. > > What kind of issues can come up for this. i don't know if someone here has experience with this already but i suspect that if you want to get the same behaviour and functionality like in X this is a quite some effort. But even quite low performance devices like the Nokia 770 use GTK with X (2.6 in this case) so i really wonder if this effort and loss of flexibility it worth that effort. Greetings Florian -- -- The dream of yesterday Florian Boor is the hope of today Tel: 0271-771091-14 and the reality of tomorrow. Fax: 0271-771091-19 [Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904] florian.boor <at> kernelconcepts.de 6C 44 30 4C 43 20 6B 61 16 07 0F AA E6 97 70 A8
RSS Feed