1 Sep 10:03
Re: % signal change clarifications
Matthew Brett <matthew.brett <at> gmail.com>
2006-09-01 08:03:03 GMT
2006-09-01 08:03:03 GMT
Hi, > I've red a lot of documentation about the % signal change calculation for a > ROI but I'm not sure to understand. I proceed as follow for each subject: > After running the ROI first level analysis in marsbar via GUI select Results > -> % signal change -> "New" for Event type -> Add the event of interest -> > "0" for event duration (I've an event related design) -> I take the OUTPUT > VALUE in the command window So - that output value is the marsbar calculation of the percent signal change from this event. This will have taken into account multiple basis functions, and the intercept that you mention below. -> Results -> MarsBar SPM graph -> Contrast > estimates and 90% C.l. -> select Effects of interest -> in the command > window I type beta -> I take the INTERCEPT (last column) -> %signal change = > (OUTPUT VALUE/INTERCEPT)*100. No - so the output value above has already been divided by the intercept, so this step is not correct. > If all is ok, Can I average the % signal change for each subject to obtain a > mean % signal change for the group? Yes, that's quite a common thing to do. > Can I take different % signal change if I include or don't include the 6 > realign regressors in the design matrix? You will get slightly or even very different answers with the realign(Continue reading)
RSS Feed