Re: new frame types (again)
m. allan noah <kitno455 <at> gmail.com>
2009-11-02 13:25:03 GMT
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Alessandro Zummo
<azummo-lists <at> towertech.it> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:45:47 -0400
> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> Correct. We will re-open the discussion of the API changes after we
>> get 1.0.20 out the door. I suppose you could still send the RGBI data,
>> and tell the front-end that it gets more bytes per line than expected.
>> But that will make most front-ends choke, so it is a poor workaround.
> Here we go... 1.0.20 is way out of the door and it's time to reopen
> this 4 (?) years old discussion.
> We have the new frame types in sane.h but they're
> commented out... the question is...
> anyone is against removing that #if 0 ?
're-open the discussion' != 'remove the #if 0'
frankly, it is bad when we don't do frequent releases, and so we tell
users of new equipment that they have to build from git repo, but the
git repo uses a different API.
so- lets release current tree as 1.0.21 in one month. At the same
time, we finalize the 2.0 spec. If we keep it small, we can do a 2.0
release around Jan 1. I'm pretty busy, but if i can get some help we
can swing it.
i am sure sane 1.0.21 and sane 2.0.0 will have to live concurrently
for a little while, so we will have to keep that in mind.
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel <at> lists.alioth.debian.org
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
to sane-devel-request <at> lists.alioth.debian.org