Re: Test Lexmark X1130

Thanks for testing it.  You can actually adjust the size. This isn't 
obvious in xsane, which seems to minimize the standard options window by 
default. If you pop this window open you can select from several 
different sizes.

regards,
Fred Odendaal

Gonzalo Marcote Peña wrote:

>... At least the Lexmark X1185 is now supported by the lexmark backend. Maybe 
>the other X11.. scanners also work? Please tell us about your results (send 
>mail to sane-devel <at> lists.alioth.debian.org)....
>
>I have tested my Lexmark X1130 with the new SANE-Backends-1.0.17.
>It respond, but it only scane a little part down in the left.
>But it seems that the support is near.
>Thanks for your work.
>
>		
>______________________________________________ 
>LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. 
>Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. 
>http://es.voice.yahoo.com
>
>
>  
>

--

-- 

Epson PF3490 in raw mode

Hi Krzysztof,

Did you manage to patch the snapscan backend in order to get full bit
depth raw (uncorrected) data from your scanner? I'm interested also but
have very limited C skills.

Levente

--

-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel <at> lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
             to sane-devel-request <at> lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: help with Canon 650U

Hi,

from what I see from the logs everything looks fine! The scanner is detected
but the backend refuses to open the device node.
Did you start scanimage -L as user or root?

Gerhard

On Tuesday 28 February 2006 17:56, void <at> chatcircuit.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Well, I bought myself a Thumbdrive so I can actually get the data you need to
> help me out. I'm still having problems getting this scanner to work in my
> native linux box. I'm starting to think it is a udev problem. Included is is
> the outputs of files and commands that I think are perhaps relevent.
> 
> here is what happens when I do scanimage -L
> 
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of plustek to 255.
> [plustek] Plustek backend V0.48-10, part of sane-backends 1.0.15
> [plustek] ># Plustek-SANE Backend configuration file<
> [plustek] ># For use with LM9831/2/3 based USB scanners<
> [plustek] >#<
> [plustek] ><
> [plustek] ># each device needs at least two lines:<
> [plustek] ># - [usb] vendor-ID and product-ID<
> [plustek] ># - device devicename<
> [plustek] ># i.e. for Plustek (0x07B3) UT12/16/24 (0x0017)<
> [plustek] ># [usb] 0x07B3 0x0017<
> [plustek] ># device /dev/usbscanner<

Re: Epson PF3490 in raw mode

Hi,

Levente Novák <lnovak <at> dragon.unideb.hu> writes:

> Did you manage to patch the snapscan backend in order to get full bit
> depth raw (uncorrected) data from your scanner? I'm interested also but
> have very limited C skills.

Not yet but I have only limited time for this so I expect it will take
another couple of week(end)s or more.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa

--

-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel <at> lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
             to sane-devel-request <at> lists.alioth.debian.org

RE: help with Canon 650U

those logs are from root. I looked at my kernel. I have all the usb stuff
compiled into the kernel. I have usbfs compiled. I'm guessing it is a problem
with udev. I ran the knoppix cd last night, hotplug creates /dev/usbscanner and
my native machine does not. I have hotplug, udev, and coldplug installed. right
now the kernel is using udev. I can see that in /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug. I
didn't bring logs with me today, I have left over hotplug config files on my
thumbdrive. hotplug doesn't even do a thing with my scanner. It's like hotplug
doesn't see something that is there. as for udev, I noticed last night that
scanners isn't listed in the rules. So far today I haven't found anything for a
need for scanner in the rules.

Well, if you can think of anything post back.

Thanks again,
Josh

--

-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel <at> lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
             to sane-devel-request <at> lists.alioth.debian.org

Ricoh IS450DE

Hello,

We have two Ricoh IS 450DE scanners which are not supported by SANE.  We
are very interested in continuing to use these scanners in our SANE
environment.  Is anyone interested in developing a backup for this
scanner?  If so, please contact me.  I am interested in paying for the
work and the completed work would be integrated into the SANE project.

Regards,

-- 
Erick S. Tyack
Acurrus Consulting, LLC                       Email: etyack <at> acurrus.com
2313 Clawson Ave.                              Voice:  248.302.1855
Royal Oak, MI  48073                           Fax:    248.928.5239

--

-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel <at> lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
             to sane-devel-request <at> lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Help with Epson Perfection 3490 Photo

Hi,

> I just bought this scanner -- it seems that the problem is related
> to one I've just seen on the mailing list.

Yes, probably. In your case it is definitely a "scan module locked 
error" - which means you should check the manual and remove the 
transportation lock.

> [snapscan] sense_handler: sense key: 0x04, asc: 0x00, ascq: 0x00, 
> i1: 0x00, i2: 0x04 
> [snapscan] sense_handler: Hardware error. (0x00, 0x04)

/Oliver

--

-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel <at> lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
             to sane-devel-request <at> lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: add support fujitsu 5120

Hi,

On Tuesday 21 February 2006 16:01, m. allan noah wrote:
> benoit, thanks for the hack :) i am currently re-writing the fujitsu 
> backend to better support the newer model usb scanners. i would not use it 
> for your customers, but i have been placing the updated backend here:
> 
> http://www2.pfeiffer.edu/~anoah/fujitsu/

Those Fujitsu scanners are not Avision OEM one? (I have not yet looked
at your souce though.) I hope you do not throw time duplicating what
is in avision.c for years .. ,-)

Yours,

-- 
René Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany)
            http://www.exactcode.de | http://www.t2-project.org
            +49 (0)30  255 897 45

--

-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel <at> lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
             to sane-devel-request <at> lists.alioth.debian.org

[RFC] additional sanei_usb API to queue multiple URBs asynchronly

Hi all,

I currently review how to further improve the SANE/Avision backend to
get to the scanners maximal thruput, e.g. what the Windows driver
get's out of those devices.

The 16kB buffer of the Linux usbfs devio looks like a showstopper and
the kernel people indicate it is not likely to be removed / resolved easily or
soon.

Another option would be to queue more URBs and handle the completion
asynchonously. Would anyone veto when I further extend the API with
async flavours?

Yours,

-- 
René Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany)
            http://www.exactcode.de | http://www.t2-project.org
            +49 (0)30  255 897 45

--

-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel <at> lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
             to sane-devel-request <at> lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: add support fujitsu 5120

On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, [utf-8] René Rebe wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 16:01, m. allan noah wrote:
>> benoit, thanks for the hack :) i am currently re-writing the fujitsu
>> backend to better support the newer model usb scanners. i would not use it
>> for your customers, but i have been placing the updated backend here:
>>
>> http://www2.pfeiffer.edu/~anoah/fujitsu/
>
> Those Fujitsu scanners are not Avision OEM one? (I have not yet looked
> at your souce though.) I hope you do not throw time duplicating what
> is in avision.c for years .. ,-)
>

nope- AFAIK, only the sp15c, sp620c and perhaps one of those 40xx models 
are avision. the 5110eox2 is mustek, and the rest are fujitsu made.

allan

> Yours,
>
>

-- 
"so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know.
money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera

--

--