1 Sep 2006 11:44
Re: linker speed question
Ross Ridge wrote: > It's one thing if you and Keith Marshall want to prohibit any mention > of alternatives to MinGW on these lists... I don't object to members suggesting alternatives to MinGW tools; nor I did I indend to imply that we should prohibit the posting of such suggestions on these lists. What I *do* object to, is the blatantly misleading manner in which this particular suggestion, of an alternative to MinGW's `ld', advertised it as `a drop-in replacement' for the standard offering; it doesn't support the full gamut of `ld' switches, so it most definitely does not fulfil the implied promise. None the less, it may still be of interest to some users, on the basis of its claimed speed advantage. I think it is good that users are made aware of such alternatives, but please, be honest about their limitations. Regards, Keith. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ MinGW-users mailing list MinGW-users@... You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:(Continue reading)
RSS Feed