headers
SourceForge.net | 3 Sep 2007 01:05
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Bugs-1645851 ] rm -r ../testdir fails to remove testdir

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Bugs item #1645851, was opened at 2007-01-27 08:51
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cstrauss
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=1645851&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: msys
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Cesar Strauss (cstrauss)
Assigned to: Cesar Strauss (cstrauss)
Summary: rm -r ../testdir fails to remove testdir

Initial Comment:
The following recursive rm invocation fails to remove the top-level directory. The failure appears to be
linked somehow with a '..' in the directory name.

$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ mkdir ../testdir
$ touch ../testdir/testfile
$ du -a ..
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 14 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 3 Sep 2007 01:09
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Bugs-1711379 ] /bin/install and /bin/install-info fail on Vista

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Bugs item #1711379, was opened at 2007-05-02 13:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cstrauss
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=1711379&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: msys
Group: Vista Issue
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Mark Bourne (mbourne)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: /bin/install and /bin/install-info fail on Vista

Initial Comment:
/bin/install and /bin/install-info result in a "Permission denied" error on Vista.

Vista uses heuristics based, amongst other things, on the executable name to detect install programs.
Having "install" in the names of these executables causes Vista to think they need Administrative
privileges to run, and so results in a "Permission denied" error when they are called without
Administrative privileges.

This can be fixed by including the attached install.exe.manifest and install-info.exe.manifest in the
/bin/ directory. These files override Vista's heuristics and tell it that the corresponding
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 5 Sep 2007 15:04
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Patches-1788440 ] Patch to fix incorrect operation in x_sprintf

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Patches item #1788440, was opened at 2007-09-05 09:04
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=302435&aid=1788440&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: runtime
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: David Daeschler (ddaeschl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Patch to fix incorrect operation in x_sprintf

Initial Comment:
mingwex/gdtoa/mingw_snprintf.c

When x_sprintf is called with an l (ell) parameter in the format string, such as %ld, it incorrectly assumes
that the matching argument will be long long (as if I specified %lld [ell ell dee]).

This is due to a bug in this part of the file:

case 'l':
  if (fmt[0] == 'l')
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 6 Sep 2007 04:33
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Patches-1789093 ] Modernize mingw10.dll build procedure

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Patches item #1789093, was opened at 2007-09-05 22:33
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=302435&aid=1789093&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Charles Wilson (cwilso11)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Modernize mingw10.dll build procedure

Initial Comment:
As discussed in this thread:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/23721

The current build procedure for mingw10.dll produces a DLL with duplicate .reloc sections.  According to 

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/23739

the patch posted here (and attached to this tracker):
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 6 Sep 2007 17:50
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Patches-1788440 ] Patch to fix incorrect operation in x_sprintf

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Patches item #1788440, was opened at 2007-09-05 09:04
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ddaeschl
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=302435&aid=1788440&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: runtime
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: David Daeschler (ddaeschl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Patch to fix incorrect operation in x_sprintf

Initial Comment:
mingwex/gdtoa/mingw_snprintf.c

When x_sprintf is called with an l (ell) parameter in the format string, such as %ld, it incorrectly assumes
that the matching argument will be long long (as if I specified %lld [ell ell dee]).

This is due to a bug in this part of the file:

case 'l':
  if (fmt[0] == 'l')
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 6 Sep 2007 17:54
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Patches-1788440 ] Patch to fix incorrect operation in x_sprintf

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Patches item #1788440, was opened at 2007-09-05 09:04
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ddaeschl
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=302435&aid=1788440&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: runtime
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: David Daeschler (ddaeschl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Patch to fix incorrect operation in x_sprintf

Initial Comment:
mingwex/gdtoa/mingw_snprintf.c

When x_sprintf is called with an l (ell) parameter in the format string, such as %ld, it incorrectly assumes
that the matching argument will be long long (as if I specified %lld [ell ell dee]).

This is due to a bug in this part of the file:

case 'l':
  if (fmt[0] == 'l')
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 7 Sep 2007 14:07
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Support Requests-1790068 ] GCC v4 libgcc files corrupt?

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Support Requests item #1790068, was opened at 2007-09-07 12:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=202435&aid=1790068&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: MinGW
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Peter (pir99)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: GCC v4 libgcc files corrupt?

Initial Comment:
I have tried downloading libgcc_dw2_1.dll.gz (and also libgcc_sjlj_1.dll.gz) on three different PCs
but on each machine, gzip reports that these files are not in gzip format. (7-zip cannot read these files
either.) All the other files from v4.2.1-dw2 seem to unpack OK.

I'm wondering if if these libgcc files have become mangled in some way? Could somebody else check them out?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=202435&aid=1790068&group_id=2435
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 7 Sep 2007 16:40
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Support Requests-1790068 ] GCC v4 libgcc files corrupt?

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Support Requests item #1790068, was opened at 2007-09-07 07:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kenjackson
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=202435&aid=1790068&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: MinGW
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Peter (pir99)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: GCC v4 libgcc files corrupt?

Initial Comment:
I have tried downloading libgcc_dw2_1.dll.gz (and also libgcc_sjlj_1.dll.gz) on three different PCs
but on each machine, gzip reports that these files are not in gzip format. (7-zip cannot read these files
either.) All the other files from v4.2.1-dw2 seem to unpack OK.

I'm wondering if if these libgcc files have become mangled in some way? Could somebody else check them out?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Jackson (kenjackson)
Date: 2007-09-07 09:40
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 7 Sep 2007 17:21
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Support Requests-1790068 ] GCC v4 libgcc files corrupt?

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Support Requests item #1790068, was opened at 2007-09-07 12:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pir99
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=202435&aid=1790068&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: MinGW
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Peter (pir99)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: GCC v4 libgcc files corrupt?

Initial Comment:
I have tried downloading libgcc_dw2_1.dll.gz (and also libgcc_sjlj_1.dll.gz) on three different PCs
but on each machine, gzip reports that these files are not in gzip format. (7-zip cannot read these files
either.) All the other files from v4.2.1-dw2 seem to unpack OK.

I'm wondering if if these libgcc files have become mangled in some way? Could somebody else check them out?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Peter (pir99)
Date: 2007-09-07 15:21
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 7 Sep 2007 20:24
Picon
Favicon

[ mingw-Support Requests-1790068 ] GCC v4 libgcc files corrupt?

This list is used to send updates of submitted patches, bug reports and file releases.  You are discouraged
from posting to this list.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify.
Support Requests item #1790068, was opened at 2007-09-07 08:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by earnie
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=202435&aid=1790068&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: MinGW
>Group: Not MinGW related
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Peter (pir99)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: GCC v4 libgcc files corrupt?

Initial Comment:
I have tried downloading libgcc_dw2_1.dll.gz (and also libgcc_sjlj_1.dll.gz) on three different PCs
but on each machine, gzip reports that these files are not in gzip format. (7-zip cannot read these files
either.) All the other files from v4.2.1-dw2 seem to unpack OK.

I'm wondering if if these libgcc files have become mangled in some way? Could somebody else check them out?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Earnie Boyd (earnie)
Date: 2007-09-07 14:24
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane