1 Feb 2005 05:43
Re: bug - not feature
Hi Owen, Other than the fact that I really like the interaction of the substring matching, no there's not really a great reason to keep it. Though if people chose sane names for notes it doesn't become an issue. The renaming issue is certainly a problem though, but enforcing word boundaries doesn't exactly solve it, it just makes it less common. Although maybe word boundaries is a good enough heuristic. -Alex On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 13:12 -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > Personally I can't think of a single case where I want a link as a > substring of a larger word. Have we already come up with a good reason > why tomboy looks in substrings in the first place? > > owen > > > > On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 11:58 -0500, Sudarshan N wrote: > > I think yet another solution would be to make the linking Case > > sensitive. So If you have a note called Mono, and want links to > > 'monoish'. it wouldnt work, but would work for 'Monoish' and > > 'Mono.Cecil'. > > > > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:35:08 +0100, Bugra Uytun <bugra@...> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 19:10 -0600, Zac Bowling wrote:(Continue reading)
RSS Feed