Re: [Muine] RE: Introducing Muine, Rhythmbox in 2.8 and other things
Jorn Baayen <jbaayen <at> gnome.org>
2004-05-08 11:00:42 GMT
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:26 -0700, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
> >Something that plays music files, like totem, is a must in my opinion, but
> a full-blown music player is not something everybody will use.
>
> Totem is a video player in its heart, not a music player. If Rhythmbox has
> "usage problems" in its current incarnation as you said, Totem has many more
> as an audio player, because its main purpose and design was materialized
> around the target of becoming a video player. That reason alone constitues
> the need for a dedicated music/audio player on Gnome.
My point was that we just need to have something that plays mp3s and ogg
files, something the user streams off a news site or whatever, because
that is something everybody needs, home, office, wherever. Of course
Totem is not suitable as a serious music player :)
>
> >I mean, having a full blown music playback application in an office
> workstation seems a little out of place.
>
> I respectfully disagree. For example, take away my husband's media player
> while he's coding at work and he'll come after you. I can't live without
> WinAMP either, it's on 24/7, streaming Eurodance from www.DI.fm
Yes, but I don't think that is like a "secretary office job" .. :)
Many regular users (probably most, I'm obviously excluding "hacker
folks" and computer enthusiasts here, merely talking about the people
who sit at the office just to get their job done) wouldn't even know how
to create a music collection, let alone have the desire to. I've seen
people been intimidated by completely full start/gnome menus, and if
(Continue reading)