18 Jan 2003 19:02
Re: adding dead space to floating panels
Dave Bordoley <bordoley <at> msu.edu>
2003-01-18 18:02:24 GMT
2003-01-18 18:02:24 GMT
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 17:34, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 04:06, Dave Bordoley wrote: > > > FWIW, I think floating panels are an "edge" case, which have ui problems > > by their design. They also expose some of the deeper ui problems with > > the panel (over configurability). So my general response to this > > statement is that you don't screw up the ui of all other panels just > > because one case has problems. > > What are these "deeper UI issues" ? Issues don't get fixed or even > thought about unless you tell us what they are. > > Good Luck, > Mark. Hi Mark, Many of them are well known among the ui team, the most obvious of which is the dependence of context menus for customization of the panels (which is why floating panels seem to have problems in this respect). Another issues imo includes the existance of too many different types of panels. I believe Calum had proposed their only being one panel type which changed behaviors based on where the user positioned it. I'll probably catch some flack here, but i personally wouldn't mind there only being one type of panel all together (edge panels). Of course such a change would probably cause a mass uprising.(Continue reading)
>
> Havoc
>
>
So does this mean people don't use autoraise and hence the preference is
no longer needed...
/me runs
dave
RSS Feed