GNOME development

Elliot Lee | 1 Mar 2004 06:00

Picon

BUG NAG: 7466 bugs open on bugzilla.gnome.org


                     Component | # of Bugs
                      nautilus | 714  
                          gtk+ | 565  
                control-center | 258  
                     gnome-vfs | 258  
                       GnuCash | 225  
                   gnome-panel | 213  
                 gnome-applets | 155  
                        galeon | 144  
                     GStreamer | 142  
                       doxygen | 135  
                       sawfish | 122  
                         balsa | 121  
                     rhythmbox | 115  
                           dia | 110  
                gnome-terminal | 108  
                      metacity | 107  
                          GIMP | 107  
                   gnome-pilot | 107  
                      Gnumeric | 106  
                  conglomerate | 102  
                      epiphany | 100  
                    libgnomeui | 88   
                       libwnck | 88   
                           vte | 87   
                 gnome-session | 84   
                        libzvt | 78   
                          glib | 77   
                       website | 77

(Continue reading)

Johan FISCHER | 2 Mar 2004 03:21

[patch] glib documentation

Hi,

I don't know if it's the right place to send this but i'm not yet subscribed to
the glib mailling list.

I found a problem in the html documentation generation using gtk-doc. There was
a missing closing tag in the g_main_depth function documentation
(glib/gmain.c).

I attached a patch to correct this.

If the mailling was the good one, can someone forward it to the right one ?

Ths.

Johan.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Attachment (gmain.c.diff): text/x-patch, 408 bytes

Attachment: application/pgp-keys, 1018 bytes

Billy O'Connor | 2 Mar 2004 03:26

Re: [patch] glib documentation


Johan FISCHER <linux <at> fischaz.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I don't know if it's the right place to send this but i'm not yet subscribed to
> the glib mailling list.
>
> I found a problem in the html documentation generation using gtk-doc. There was
> a missing closing tag in the g_main_depth function documentation
> (glib/gmain.c).
>
> I attached a patch to correct this.
>
> If the mailling was the good one, can someone forward it to the right one ?

Try to familiarize yourself with bugzilla, it's better than mailing
patches.

--

-- 
GNU/Linux revenues last quarter: $1 Billion.
micros~1  revenues last quarter: $4 Billion.
It's no longer a question of windows or GNU, it's a question of *Unix* or GNU.

Johan FISCHER | 2 Mar 2004 03:59

Re: [patch] glib documentation

Quoting Billy O'Connor <billyoc <at> gnuyork.org>:

>
> Try to familiarize yourself with bugzilla, it's better than mailing
> patches.

I thought that sending a patch to a mailling list was easier to see and commit
than going to a huge process of reporting a bug for just 1 line of code 
missing
but thx.

Johan.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Attachment: application/pgp-keys, 1018 bytes

Alexander Larsson | 2 Mar 2004 10:18

Picon

Re: Circular dependency between libgnomeui and gnome-vfs?


On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:52, Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> from libgnomeui/configure.in:
> GNOMEUI_MODULES="libgnome-2.0 >= 2.0.0 libgnomecanvas-2.0 >= 2.0.0 \
>  libbonoboui-2.0 >= 2.0.0 gconf-2.0 >= 1.1.11 pango >= 1.1.2 \
>  gnome-vfs-2.0 >= 2.5.3 gnome-keyring-1"
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> And from gnome-vfs/configure.in:
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GTK, gtk+-2.0 >= 2.3.1 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.5.1,\
>  AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_GTK, true))         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> So did I interpret this correctly that there is circular dependency
> between gnome-vfs and libgnomeui?  I looked at this because jhbuild
> failed to build Gnome from cvs for me.  Also related changelog entry
> (libgnomeui/ChangeLog) seems to be two months old:
> 
> 2003-12-14  Fernando Herrera
> 
>         * configure.in: requiere gnome-vfs-2.0 >= 2.5.3 for new auth sutff
> 
> So is there some another way to build Gnome 2.5 meaning I've some
> other problem with jhbuild?
> 
> PS. Please Cc me, I'm not subscribed.

This is fixed in cvs head, but at the moment, just build gnome-vfs

(Continue reading)

Thomas Vander Stichele | 2 Mar 2004 11:51

Re: [patch] glib documentation


> >
> > Try to familiarize yourself with bugzilla, it's better than mailing
> > patches.
> 
> I thought that sending a patch to a mailling list was easier to see and commit
> than going to a huge process of reporting a bug for just 1 line of code 
> missing
> but thx.

I was about to apply the patch since I noticed the same problem
yesterday and it was breaking the build, but someone beat me to it. 
Said someone also forgot to add a ChangeLog entry.  Could said someone
please add that too ?

Thanks
Thomas

Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
"Would you like my advice ?"
"That depends. Will I like it ?"
"Of course you won't ! My advice is based on reality !"
<-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/

Fabio Gomes | 2 Mar 2004 16:51

Picon

To Discuss: Application Startup Time


Dear friends,

	Is there any past work related to optimizing the startup time of GNOME
applications?

	Why does Emacs, a complex scriptable beast, start faster than GEdit,
the (supposed to be) lightweight text editor?

	What are the main bottlenecks of application startup in GNOME? I see
that when GNOME 2.0 was released, some new technologies such as
client-side fonts raised the startup time significantly when compared to
1.x applications. 

	I would like to bring up a discussion on how we could make GNOME
applications start faster, at hacker level and user level.

	Any toughts?	
--

-- 
Fabio Gomes de Souza <fabio <at> gs2.com.br> (+55 81 9132-1845)

.- GS2 TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO LTDA :: www.gs2.com.br
|- IT Infrastructure :: Security :: Embedded systems :: Linux
`- Olinda, Brazil - +55 81 3492-7777 - negocios <at> gs2.com.br

Fabio Gomes | 2 Mar 2004 16:51

Picon

To Discuss: Application Startup Time


Dear friends,

	Is there any past work related to optimizing the startup time of GNOME
applications?

	Why does Emacs, a complex scriptable beast, start faster than GEdit,
the (supposed to be) lightweight text editor?

	What are the main bottlenecks of application startup in GNOME? I see
that when GNOME 2.0 was released, some new technologies such as
client-side fonts raised the startup time significantly when compared to
1.x applications. 

	I would like to bring up a discussion on how we could make GNOME
applications start faster, at hacker level and user level.

	Any toughts?	
--

-- 
Fabio Gomes de Souza <fabio <at> gs2.com.br> (+55 81 9132-1845)

.- GS2 TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO LTDA :: www.gs2.com.br
|- IT Infrastructure :: Security :: Embedded systems :: Linux
`- Olinda, Brazil - +55 81 3492-7777 - negocios <at> gs2.com.br

Havoc Pennington | 3 Mar 2004 03:57

Picon

Re: To Discuss: Application Startup Time

Hi,

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 10:51, Fabio Gomes wrote:
> 	I would like to bring up a discussion on how we could make GNOME
> applications start faster, at hacker level and user level.
> 

Not to be a smartass, but the discussion is very short 

1. Profile application startup
2. Post mail with profile results showing what takes up what 
   percent of startup time
3. Optimize those things that take up most of the time

Valgrind, oprofile, gprof, speedprof could all be useful tools for step
1...

Havoc

Sridhar R | 3 Mar 2004 08:47

Picon

Re: To Discuss: Application Startup Time


On Tue, Fabio Gomes wrote:
> 
> 	Is there any past work related to optimizing the
> startup time of GNOME
> applications?
> 
> 	Why does Emacs, a complex scriptable beast, start
> faster than GEdit,
> the (supposed to be) lightweight text editor?
> 
> 	What are the main bottlenecks of application
> startup in GNOME? I see
> that when GNOME 2.0 was released, some new
> technologies such as
> client-side fonts raised the startup time
> significantly when compared to
> 1.x applications. 
> 
> 	I would like to bring up a discussion on how we
> could make GNOME
> applications start faster, at hacker level and user
> level.
> 
> 	Any toughts?	

   Well. I am now a GNOME hacker.  I really don't know
what makes GNOME/GTK+ apps to start slower.  For GNOME
apps, the delay is (might be) in gnome_program_init
function.  Any application needs to initialize some

(Continue reading)

Group

gmane.comp.gnome.devel.

Search Archive

Page

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Articles in period: 59

March 2004

Language

Change language

Options

Current view: Threads only / Showing only 20 lines / Not hiding cited text.
Change to All messages, whole messages, or hide cited text.

Post a message
NNTP Newsgroup
Classic Gmane web interface
XML

XML

RSS Feed
List Information

About Gmane

Recent entries

json-glib problem (23 May 2013)
json-glib problem (23 May 2013)
The problem of GNOME3 is not the GNOME Shell (2 May 2013)
The bunch of examples (2 May 2013)
configure script requires intltool (20 Apr 2013)
Questions about GClosure (7 Apr 2013)
GArray conversion (4 Apr 2013)
GSOC Idea (15 Mar 2013)
Name for sanad is merged with the last name value. (22 Feb 2013)
Gnome-system-monitor - rounded graphs: a proof of concept (20 Dec 2012)
Coordination between developers in the GNOME project (1 Nov 2012)
Coordination between developers in the GNOME project (1 Nov 2012)
glib gio usage of the library outside of GNOME (24 Oct 2012)
How to prevent gnome-settings-daemon from touching keyboard configurat (31 Oct 2012)
progressbar style classes (20 Sep 2012)
Problem gtk with gnome. (18 Sep 2012)
popup menu (24 Jul 2012)
popup menu (24 Jul 2012)
No package 'udisks2' found (19 Jul 2012)
control center display and tablets / rotating tablets (10 Jun 2012)
regarding metacity/mutter theming (4 Jun 2012)

Archives

5	May 2013
7	April 2013
2	March 2013
1	February 2013
1	December 2012
4	November 2012
5	October 2012
2	September 2012
3	July 2012
4	June 2012
2	February 2012
1	January 2012
2	December 2011
1	November 2011
7	October 2011
7	September 2011
14	August 2011
1	July 2011
6	June 2011
5	May 2011
9	March 2011
5	February 2011
5	January 2011
3	December 2010
1	October 2010
1	September 2010
8	August 2010
9	July 2010
1	June 2010
3	May 2010
10	April 2010
7	March 2010
8	February 2010
2	January 2010
4	December 2009
6	August 2009
3	July 2009
8	June 2009
8	May 2009
4	April 2009
12	March 2009
19	February 2009
16	January 2009
5	December 2008
5	November 2008
33	October 2008
13	September 2008
7	August 2008
33	July 2008
5	June 2008
2	May 2008
5	April 2008
7	March 2008
9	February 2008
11	January 2008
7	December 2007
11	November 2007
8	October 2007
2	September 2007
1	August 2007
3	July 2007
8	June 2007
5	May 2007
9	April 2007
42	March 2007
17	February 2007
33	January 2007
18	December 2006
1	November 2006
4	October 2006
7	September 2006
18	August 2006
26	July 2006
23	June 2006
19	May 2006
18	April 2006
35	March 2006
24	February 2006
30	January 2006
24	December 2005
16	November 2005
1	October 2005
51	September 2005
17	August 2005
47	July 2005
31	June 2005
40	May 2005
92	April 2005
76	March 2005
72	February 2005
41	January 2005
41	December 2004
18	November 2004
59	October 2004
95	September 2004
65	August 2004
98	July 2004
36	June 2004
134	May 2004
39	April 2004
59	March 2004
59	February 2004
85	January 2004
187	December 2003
45	November 2003
55	October 2003
67	September 2003
55	August 2003
88	July 2003
88	June 2003
98	May 2003
176	April 2003
71	March 2003
99	February 2003
69	January 2003
86	December 2002
140	November 2002
111	October 2002
167	September 2002
153	August 2002
131	July 2002
53	June 2002
100	May 2002
173	April 2002
23	March 2002
1	December 2000

Design

Zawodny | Right Menu | Left Menu

Your Own Design

Paste the URL of your CSS below. Download CSS template