headers
Andre Klapper | 1 Jan 2010 20:02
Picon

Annual GNOME Bugzilla statistics for 2009

Ladies and Gentlemen,

once again it's time to take a look at GNOME Bugzilla activity in 2009
though no scripts were run yet to provide more information because they
probably have not been ported to Bugzilla 3.4. Anyway, the basic info
exists.

Please keep in mind to not draw too many conclusions from these values,
especially because some of them might be wrong. :-P

Overall statistics:
                                2009    2008    2007
  Open reports at the end(*):   40527  37180    33967
  Opened in that year:          39403  59309   114043
  Closed in that year:          40280  56546   108807
    (*): Excludes reports marked as enhancements
    [A valuable number of reports had also been blocked by
     GNOME Bugzilla's auto-reject feature until 08/2009 or 
     went to crash.gnome.org which is down.]

The following people closed more than 700 bugs in 2009:
  2434       Akhil Laddha
  1784       Fabio Durán Verdugo
  1471       André Klapper
   939       Bastien Nocera
   782       Milan Crha
   762       Matthew Barnes
   746       Tobias Mueller

The following people reported more than 300 bugs in 2009:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Javier Jardón | 4 Jan 2010 18:53
Picon

New propossed GnomeGoal: Add code coverage support

Hello,

The objective of the GnomeGoal is to add code coverage of your code
with GCOV [1]
You can take a look to the GnomeGoal page here: [2] (There are also
examples to add GCOV support to json-glib and libgdata)

As a side effect, the idea is encourage devels to:
 - Use the new Glib and GTK+ test frameworks [3] and [4]
 - Use build.gnome.org service. For example, take a look to Glib coverage [5]

All the info is available in the GnomeGoal/AddCodeCoverage page.

Comments / suggestions welcomed.

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html
[2] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AddCodeCoverage
[3] http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/stable/glib-Testing.html
[4] http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/stable/gtk-Testing.html
[5] http://fixed.gnome.org/coverage/glib/lcov/
--

-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list <at> gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Permalink | Reply | 9 comments |
headers
Javier Jardón | 7 Jan 2010 20:57
Picon

Session management support, really necessary?

Hello all,

I'd like to discuss about Session Management support [1], and if it's
really necessary.

Lot of modules are replacing GnomeClient with EggSMClient [2], but
some people maintain GnomeClient can be destroyed (or converted to a
"logging out
now" notification) instead of replaced.
Indeed, seems that "if there had never been a GnomeClient, anyone
would want to add EggSMClient or add XSMP to GTK+".

Read Havoc's comment here for a great resume: [3]

How all this fit in the Gnome 3 approach?

Comments?

[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79285
[2] http://live.gnome.org/SessionManagement/EggSMClient
[3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79285#c30
--

-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list <at> gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bastien Nocera | 8 Jan 2010 14:46
Favicon

totem-pl-parser branched for 2.28

SSIA

Cheers
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Max | 9 Jan 2010 12:58

Fwd: Linux Express Desktop *LED*

Hello
as LED seems to be based on GNOME, I forward the mail here.
Maybe it is possible to regard LED as a THEME for Gnome, so that Gnome
can integrate it or adjust itself more to the given layout of Linux
Express Desktop of ylmp.org

btw. is someone working on the online desktop? dooble.sf.net has a
desktop integrated in the browser, maybe it is of interest to add the
online desktop in a browser tab? If someone can discuss and send info
about that, please contact directly.

Thanks for a feedback, if someone starts to realize this LED Theme or
3. Desktop Layout.
Max

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Max <petersonmaxx <at> googlemail.com>
Date: 2010/1/9
Subject: Linux Express Desktop *LED*
To: dooble-team <Dooble-team <at> lists.sourceforge.net>, Ubuntu Developers
<ubuntu-devel <at> lists.ubuntu.com>
Cc: Jonathan Riddell <riddell <at> gmail.com>, Michał Zając <michal.zajac <at> gmail.com>

Hello
there is a new Linux XP desktop available for Ubuntu,
The website is here http://ylmf.org/
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fylmf.org%2F&sl=zh-CN&tl=en&hl=&ie=UTF-8

You can download the ISO and run the Live Desktop.
Here you find in the Menu the option to Install, not from the CD, but
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Stefan Kost | 9 Jan 2010 23:01
Picon
Gravatar

Re: New propossed GnomeGoal: Add code coverage support

Am 04.01.2010 19:53, schrieb Javier Jardón:
> Hello,
> 
> The objective of the GnomeGoal is to add code coverage of your code
> with GCOV [1]

Good goal! I wonder how many of the gnome projects even have a test suite, which
is the prerequisite :)

GCov has the drawback that one needs to rebuild the package with coverage flags
enabled. Just a few days ago I found
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bcov/
which does not needs that. I also produces (almost) same results reports like
lcov. I has some missing feature and drawback though. I plan to have a look at
some of the shortcommings.

>
> You can take a look to the GnomeGoal page here: [2] (There are also
> examples to add GCOV support to json-glib and libgdata)
>

Also in the lgo page you gave this commit as an example:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/json-glib/commit/?id=5b4186eb60e953ddbaadcd53b1996d28b06d4a97

I don't think it is a good one. In the configure check it does:
+       GCOV_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"
+       GCOV_LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"

which should be
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Emmanuele Bassi | 10 Jan 2010 10:58
Picon
Gravatar

Re: New propossed GnomeGoal: Add code coverage support

On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 00:01 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:

> Also in the lgo page you gave this commit as an example:
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/json-glib/commit/?id=5b4186eb60e953ddbaadcd53b1996d28b06d4a97
> 
> I don't think it is a good one. In the configure check it does:
> +       GCOV_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"
> +       GCOV_LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"
> 
> which should be
> 
> +       GCOV_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O0 -g -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"
> +       GCOV_LDFLAG="$LDFLAGS -lgcov"

thanks; I did copy the commit from libgdata, but probably made a copy
and paste thinko.

ciao,
 Emmanuele.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
krishna kumar | 10 Jan 2010 16:28
Picon

subscription

hi
pl enroll
--

-- 
krishnakumar T.R
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Frederic Crozat | 11 Jan 2010 11:54

TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.29.5 Development Release (also: String and UI change announcement)

Hello all,

(Sorry for the delay in sending this email)

Tarballs are due on *today*, Monday January 11th, before 23:59 UTC
for the GNOME 2.29.5 Development Release, which will be delivered on
Wednesday.

Please make sure that your tarballs will be uploaded before Monday
23:59 UTC: tarballs uploaded later than that will probably be too late
to get in 2.29.5. If you are not able to make a tarball before this
deadline or if you think you'll be late, please send a mail to the
release team and we'll find someone to roll the tarball for you!

We'd like also to remind you we are entering in :
* String Change Announcement Period : After the GNOME 2.29.5 release, 
string changes must be announced to gnome-doc-list and gnome-i18n.

* UI Change Announcement Period : After the GNOME 2.29.5 release, UI 
changes must be announced to gnome-doc-list.

For more informations about 2.29, the full schedule, the official
module lists and the proposed module lists, please see our colorful
2.29 page on the wiki:
    http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentynine

For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see:
    http://live.gnome.org/Schedule

--

--
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Andre Klapper | 11 Jan 2010 15:42
Picon

Re: pysqlite2 external dependency

Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2009, 11:31 +0100 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo
Monfort:
> jhbuild lists pysqlite2 as a GNOME external dependency, although the wiki
> doesn't. It's only used by hamster-applet, which can also use the sqlite3 module
> shipped with Python >= 2.5 (and prefers it).
> 
> Since we already require Python 2.5 as a minimum dependency, is it OK to remove
> pysqlite2 from the external dependencies?

This is still valid:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/jhbuild/tree/modulesets/gnome-external-deps-2.30.modules
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentynine/ExternalDependencies

andre
--

-- 
 mailto:ak-47 <at> gmx.net | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane