3 Dec 23:25
3 Dec 23:27
Re: ANN: testing branch @ gnome.org
Am Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:25:42 +0000 schrieb Heinrich Müller: > Hi guys. I'm happy to announce that I'm now officially co-developing pan, > at least I have a gnome git account now. > Feel free to test the "testing" branch by pulling it from there. > > git clone git > git checkout --track -b testing origin/testing > > Cheers. I mean git clone git://git.gnome.org/pan2 cd pan2 git checkout --track -b testing origin/testing sh autogen.sh --with-openssl --enable-libnotify --with-gtkspell make -j8 [(sudo) make install] Have fun! _______________________________________________ Pan-devel mailing list Pan-devel <at> nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel
4 Dec 00:38
Re: ANN: testing branch @ gnome.org
On 12/03/2011 02:27 PM, Heinrich Müller wrote: > Am Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:25:42 +0000 schrieb Heinrich Müller: > >> Hi guys. I'm happy to announce that I'm now officially co-developing pan, >> at least I have a gnome git account now. Most excellent! Congratulations and a big Thank You, too :) >> Feel free to test the "testing" branch by pulling it from there. > git clone git://git.gnome.org/pan2 Will the gnome repository now 'officially' replace your github repo? > Have fun! Guaranteed! :) _______________________________________________ Pan-devel mailing list Pan-devel <at> nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel
4 Dec 00:58
Re: ANN: testing branch @ gnome.org
Am Sat, 03 Dec 2011 15:38:20 -0800 schrieb walt: > On 12/03/2011 02:27 PM, Heinrich Müller wrote: >> Am Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:25:42 +0000 schrieb Heinrich Müller: >> >>> Hi guys. I'm happy to announce that I'm now officially co-developing pan, >>> at least I have a gnome git account now. > > Most excellent! Congratulations and a big Thank You, too :) > >>> Feel free to test the "testing" branch by pulling it from there. >> git clone git://git.gnome.org/pan2 > > Will the gnome repository now 'officially' replace your github repo? Let's wait and see. I'm motivated :D >> Have fun! > > Guaranteed! :) > Thanks :D _______________________________________________ Pan-devel mailing list Pan-devel <at> nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel
4 Dec 03:35
@ hmueller: "delete key" functionality lost in compose window, between 51ee292..72c8148 I think
I'm on 72c8148 and have been without a delete key in the compose window for several days. Initially I thought it was a bad running pan session, but when I restarted pan it still didn't work. I've been having to arrow/mouse/select to the tail end of the text and use backspace, which still works, but it sure is frustrating! Based on my bash history for git whatchanged, I believe the issue appeared 51ee292..72c8148 , but haven't verified that yet. I just switched to gnome/testing from judgefudge/master today and did a pull, hoping to see a fix, but it appears to be at 72c8148 as well. (Just tried to use delete again, on a comma I decided was superfluous. GRRR!!!) -- -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
4 Dec 08:46
Re: @ hmueller: "delete key" functionality lost in compose window, between 51ee292..72c8148 I think
Am Sun, 04 Dec 2011 02:35:56 +0000 schrieb Duncan: > I'm on 72c8148 and have been without a delete key in the compose window > for several days. Initially I thought it was a bad running pan session, > but when I restarted pan it still didn't work. > > I've been having to arrow/mouse/select to the tail end of the text and > use backspace, which still works, but it sure is frustrating! > > Based on my bash history for git whatchanged, I believe the issue > appeared 51ee292..72c8148 , but haven't verified that yet. > > I just switched to gnome/testing from judgefudge/master today and did a > pull, hoping to see a fix, but it appears to be at 72c8148 as well. > > (Just tried to use delete again, on a comma I decided was superfluous. > GRRR!!!) Fixed in gnome/testing. Thanks for the heads-up :D
4 Dec 09:10
4 Dec 10:48
Re: @ hmueller: "delete key" functionality lost in compose window, between 51ee292..72c8148 I think
Heinrich Müller posted on Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:46:49 +0000 as excerpted: > Fixed in gnome/testing. Thanks for the heads-up :D Not a problem. It stimulated me to add a git bisect helper module to my growing portage live-git-overlay-and-package helper script. That'll make it easier bisecting not only pan, but other live-git ebuild packages I have installed, when necessary. =:^) For any gentooers reading... I started the script to help me easily check git whatchanged on git-based layman managed overlays. Then I modified it to give me the same ability to check git whatchanged for live-git packages, then to allow me to easily run git show <commit> on them to check individual commits from whatchanged. Then I added ebuild unpack phase support so I could check whatchanged before I actually merged the latest version. Now I've added git bisect support so I can easily bisect package regressions (like this one) using the ebuild, instead of having to clone the git repo and build manually to bisect. There's still a number of variables hard-coded for each git-live package or git-based overlay as I haven't figured out how to make that as generic as I want yet, and it works using symlinks to the script of the form pan.c (check pan's whatchanged log), pan.s (show), pan.f (fetch/unpack), pan.b g (bisect good), etc, which means you have to create the relevant script symlinks and set some vars for each package/overlay you want it to work with, but it's coming along, and works very nicely with the pan-9999 ebuild I have in my overlay and the /etc/portage/env/net-nntp/pan-9999 file, both of which I posted some months ago, and can post again (the env(Continue reading)
4 Dec 11:20
Re: ANN: testing branch @ gnome.org
Hi, Forewarning: Wear your Fire-Proof garments for this message. In _all_ my earlier config.logs: > configure:6470: checking for GLIB - version >= 2.14.0 > […] > configure:6598: result: yes (version 2.23.6) In the brand-new gnome master and testing branches: > configure:6470: checking for GLIB - version >= 2.28.6 > configure:6602: result: no I know it was due to <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665289> by the patch <http://git.gnome.org/browse/pan2/commit/?id=365e28759852f6b16a384f826c60b9efa93053dd> (same id also for testing branch). IMO This is a badly designed patch. You should test for GLIB levels _inside_ the affected areas then adjust the #includes etc _properly_ as in a "before/after" picture. I have other gnomish tools that should stay at my current level (namely SiliconDust F/OSS projects for HDHomeRun boxes). But because of no complaints on their end,(Continue reading)
4 Dec 12:34
Re: @ hmueller: "delete key" functionality lost in compose window, between 51ee292..72c8148 I think
Duncan posted on Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:48:35 +0000 as excerpted: > Heinrich Müller posted on Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:46:49 +0000 as excerpted: > >> Fixed in gnome/testing. Thanks for the heads-up :D > > Not a problem. Now confirmed resolved/fixed. Thanks. =:^) -- -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-devel mailing list Pan-devel <at> nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel
RSS Feed