headers
remus draica | 3 Apr 2003 10:55
Picon

Re: BAUM/Sun meeting minutes 2Apr2003


Hi All,

>  - BAUM to file the bug for accessibleHyperlink->getLinkAtIndex()
>    implementation in Mozilla.
>     * Remus filed mozilla bug #197189
>
>  - Padraig (who we're giving an action item even though he doesn't
>    attend these meetings) to confirm that gtkhtml2 does the right thing
>    with accessibleHyperlink->getLinkAtIndex()
>     * Seeking clarification, where is the call "getLinkAtIndex()"
>       Perhaps "accessibleHypertext->getLinkIndex()"
>
>     * Clarfication: the call is accessibleHypertext->getLinkIndex()
>       and the problem (in Mozilla [see above]) is the call always return
>       the same link (no matter what the index ID is).

I want to say that the name of function is "getLinkIndex()" not 
"getLinkAtIndex()".
Sorry for any trouble.

Regards, 
Remus
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Calum Benson | 28 Apr 2003 12:59
Picon

Weekly A11Y Bug Nag


So, the release team thought it might be a good idea to publicise the
accessibility team's weekly list of bugs affecting GNOME accessibility,
in order to maybe get a few more people working on them.

Until one of us has time to write a script to generate the report
automatically[1], we use a list that's manually stitched together from
various bugzilla queries, so it's not pretty and doubtless contains the
odd inaccuracy.  But here's this week's for you to chew on anyway:

http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/tech-docs/access-bugs.html

Executive summary:

36 Urgent bugs (listed as "Stoppers")
48 High priority bugs ("Candidate Stoppers")
118 Normal priority bugs ("Significant")
71 Low priority bugs ("Lesser Impact")

Overall: 

8 new accessibility bugs since previous report
9 accessibility bugs closed since previous report

Notes:

- Priorities reflect the accessibility team's assessment of impact on
accessibility, which may not reflect the current bugzilla priority.

- Only bugs that affect Sun's version of GNOME are listed, so
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Albert Chin | 29 Apr 2003 21:47

at-spi-1.1.9 and Solaris 2.6, 7

Trying to build at-spi-1.1.9 on Solaris 2.6 and 7/SPARC:
(2.6)
"deviceeventcontroller.c", line 40: cannot find include file: <X11/XKBlib.h>
"deviceeventcontroller.c", line 109: syntax error before or at: XkbDescPtr
"deviceeventcontroller.c", line 109: cannot recover from previous errors
cc: acomp failed for deviceeventcontroller.c

(7)
"/usr/openwin/include/X11/XKBlib.h", line 31: cannot find include
file: <X11/extensions/XKBstr.h>
"/usr/openwin/include/X11/XKBlib.h", line 216: undefined symbol:
XkbActionMessageLength
"/usr/openwin/include/X11/XKBlib.h", line 216: can not declare
variably modified type at file scope
"/usr/openwin/include/X11/XKBlib.h", line 731: syntax error before or
at: XkbAllocKeyboard

Should I just ignore at-spi-1.1.9 on these platforms? Or maybe just
not build registryd?

--

-- 
albert chin (china <at> thewrittenword.com)
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Bill Haneman | 29 Apr 2003 22:16
Picon

Re: at-spi-1.1.9 and Solaris 2.6, 7

Hi Albert:

I think Solaris 6 and 7 don't include XKB.  I suppose registryd should
be able to build without it (the configure.in file doesn't make failure
to find XKB a fatal error), but since at-spi is currently pretty useless
without XKB I am not sure of the value.

In theory we could make registryd work without XKB if it's not found,
but it's not a high priority thing to fix IMO.

- Bill

On Tue, 2003-04-29 at 20:47, Albert Chin wrote:
> Trying to build at-spi-1.1.9 on Solaris 2.6 and 7/SPARC:
> (2.6)
> "deviceeventcontroller.c", line 40: cannot find include file: <X11/XKBlib.h>
> "deviceeventcontroller.c", line 109: syntax error before or at: XkbDescPtr
> "deviceeventcontroller.c", line 109: cannot recover from previous errors
> cc: acomp failed for deviceeventcontroller.c
> 
> (7)
> "/usr/openwin/include/X11/XKBlib.h", line 31: cannot find include
> file: <X11/extensions/XKBstr.h>
> "/usr/openwin/include/X11/XKBlib.h", line 216: undefined symbol:
> XkbActionMessageLength
> "/usr/openwin/include/X11/XKBlib.h", line 216: can not declare
> variably modified type at file scope
> "/usr/openwin/include/X11/XKBlib.h", line 731: syntax error before or
> at: XkbAllocKeyboard
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Albert Chin | 29 Apr 2003 22:38

Re: at-spi-1.1.9 and Solaris 2.6, 7

On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 09:16:25PM +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
> 
> I think Solaris 6 and 7 don't include XKB.  I suppose registryd should
> be able to build without it (the configure.in file doesn't make failure
> to find XKB a fatal error), but since at-spi is currently pretty useless
> without XKB I am not sure of the value.
> 
> In theory we could make registryd work without XKB if it's not found,
> but it's not a high priority thing to fix IMO.

Ok, well then I'll just continue building the other GNOME 2.2 packages
and see what fails as a consequence.

FYI, Solaris 7 has XKBlib.h but it's broken. It includes
<X11/extensions/XKBstr.h> which doesn't exist.

--

-- 
albert chin (china <at> thewrittenword.com)
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Padraig O'Briain | 1 May 2003 17:31
Picon

LABELLED_BY and Gtk Widgets

I have appended a patch to bug 72249 which attempts to create LABELLED_BY 
relations for widgets which are mnemonic widgets.

I would welcome feedback on whether this ppatch is worth committing.

Padraig
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane