1 Dec 2003 01:01
Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow <at> mvista.com>
2003-12-01 00:01:03 GMT
2003-12-01 00:01:03 GMT
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:42:59PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 09:47:28PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Is there anything > > interesting you can think of that GDB could do only if it knew there > > was an anonymous union involved? > > The only sligtly interesting thing is not having to replicate a large > location list, with small or no perturbations based on offset. Otherwise > it makes sense to present gdb with multiple top-level variables. For a single location expression, sure, but if there's a location list couldn't you reference the same one? -- -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
RSS Feed