headers
Gerald Pfeifer | 1 Nov 02:19

Re: [Patch, wwwdocs] gcc-4.3/changes.html: Fortran - Add GAMMA/LGAMMA

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> The following patch mentions GAMMA and LGAMMA as added GCC 4.3/Fortran
> release notes.

Thanks for taking the time to write this down!  The patch is fine, I just
recommend to use a full stop instead of a semicolon after "logarithm".

Gerald
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
FX Coudert | 2 Nov 01:02
Picon
Gravatar

Re: How do I submit a bug report?

[I'm copying this reply to the developers mailing-list, as a heads up  
about the http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html page; the original message was  
in the gnu-fortran google group]

> However, the text at the above URL mostly discusses gcc with the only
> reference to Gnu Fortran being g77.

Hum, indeed, we seriously need to update that page. Thanks for *that*  
bug report :-)

> Should a gfortran bug be   submitted through the gcc Bugzilla page?

Yes, the gcc bugzilla (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/) is the right  
place to report gfortran bugs: create a new bug, choose GCC and then  
select "fortran" as the "Component".

> Also, the text at the above
> URL says to produce *.i* files by adding the -save-temps flag, but
> doing so produces no such files.

In the case of C, the .i files are the preprocessed files. When  
reporting gfortran bugs, please include the preprocessed source  
(which has lowercase file extension), as well as any files included  
by the Fortran "include" directive, and all source files containing  
modules used in the main source file. The point is that we have to be  
able to compile and reproduce the problem with the files you give us.

Thanks,
FX
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Tobias Burnus | 2 Nov 10:55
Picon

[Patch,wwwdocs] bugs.html: Remove g77 item

Hi all,

as an email to fortran@ has just shown, the g77 item of bugs.html is
more misleading than helpful.

I would therefore suggest to remove the (g77) Fortran specific entry.

In general, the page could be shortened/updated. Who does still need a
list of bugs present in 3.3.x but fixed in 3.4.x?

Is the patch below OK for check in?

Tobias

Index: htdocs/bugs.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs.html,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -r1.96 bugs.html
--- htdocs/bugs.html    24 Oct 2006 07:37:51 -0000      1.96
+++ htdocs/bugs.html    2 Nov 2007 09:49:37 -0000
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
     <li><a href="#fixed34">Bugs fixed in the 3.4 series</a></li>
     </ul>
   </li>
-  <li><a href="#fortran">Fortran</a></li>
   </ul>
 </li>
 <li><a href="#nonbugs">Non-bugs</a>
@@ -366,15 +365,6 @@
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Tobias Burnus | 2 Nov 10:58
Picon

[Patch,wwwdocs] bugs.html: Remove g77 item

Hi all,

as an email to fortran@ has just shown, the g77 item of bugs.html is
more misleading than helpful.

I would therefore suggest to remove the (g77) Fortran specific entry.

In general, the page could be shortened/updated. Who does still need a
list of bugs present in 3.3.x but fixed in 3.4.x?

Is the patch below OK for check in?

Tobias

Index: htdocs/bugs.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs.html,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -r1.96 bugs.html
--- htdocs/bugs.html    24 Oct 2006 07:37:51 -0000      1.96
+++ htdocs/bugs.html    2 Nov 2007 09:49:37 -0000
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
     <li><a href="#fixed34">Bugs fixed in the 3.4 series</a></li>
     </ul>
   </li>
-  <li><a href="#fortran">Fortran</a></li>
   </ul>
 </li>
 <li><a href="#nonbugs">Non-bugs</a>
@@ -366,15 +365,6 @@
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Dima Sorkin | 2 Nov 17:13
Picon

tiny typo in documentation

Hi.
 On
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.2/gfortran/ALLOCATED.html#ALLOCATED

it is written

"If X is allocated, ALLOCATED(X) is .TRUE.; otherwise, it returns the .TRUE.  "

It should be ".FALSE." at the end, I think.

Regards.
Dima.
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
François-Xavier Coudert | 2 Nov 18:42
Picon
Gravatar

Re: tiny typo in documentation

> "If X is allocated, ALLOCATED(X) is .TRUE.; otherwise, it returns the .TRUE.  "
>
> It should be ".FALSE." at the end, I think.

Thanks for reporting this. Fix committed to mainline.

FX
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Catherine Moroney | 2 Nov 18:50
Picon
Picon
Favicon

status of patch 22244

Hi,

Has the gfortran patch 22244 (improve debug info for packed arrays)
been merged into the latest version of gfortran yet?

I'm currently using gcc version 4.1.2 20070502 (Red Hat 4.1.2-12) and
I had some problems using the totalview debugger viewing arrays
in gfortran-compiled code.  Their tech support people pointed me to
this patch.

If this patch hasn't been incorporated into a delivered version,
is it expected to be sometime in future?

Thanks,

Catherine

----------------------------------------------------
Catherine Moroney        Jet Propulsion Lab, CalTech
MailStop 168-414         4800 Oak Grove Drive
Pasadena, CA  91109-8099

Phone:  818-393-3392
Fax:  818-393-3134
Email: Catherine.M.Moroney <at> jpl.nasa.gov
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
François-Xavier Coudert | 2 Nov 19:28
Picon
Gravatar

Re: status of patch 22244

> Has the gfortran patch 22244 (improve debug info for packed arrays)
> been merged into the latest version of gfortran yet?

The patch went into mainline (which will become 4.3 and later
compilers) and also into the RedHat 4.1 branch (so that later 4.1
releases from RedHat will have it; for more detailed info on that
point, you should ask them). It is not present in the standard 4.1 or
4.2 releases.

FX
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Toon Moene | 2 Nov 20:14
Picon

Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] bugs.html: Remove g77 item

Tobias Burnus wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> as an email to fortran@ has just shown, the g77 item of bugs.html is
> more misleading than helpful. 

> -<p>G77 bugs are documented in the G77 manual rather than
> -explicitly listed here.  Please see
> -<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.6/g77/Trouble.html">Known Causes of
> -Trouble with GNU Fortran</a> in the G77 manual.</p>

Yes, please remove ...

[ From the last of the g77 maintainers :-) ]

--

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon <at> moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.indiv.nluug.nl/~toon/
GNU Fortran's path to Fortran 2003: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2003
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Gerald Pfeifer | 2 Nov 21:08

Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] bugs.html: Remove g77 item

On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> I would therefore suggest to remove the (g77) Fortran specific entry.

Sounds good to me as well.

> In general, the page could be shortened/updated. Who does still need a
> list of bugs present in 3.3.x but fixed in 3.4.x?

I believe that list of bugs partly served to help people migrate their
codebases from 3.3 to 3.4 (which included completely new a C++ parser)
and have them still compile with the older version as well.

GCC 3.4.0 has been released three-and-a-half years ago, so I hope the
latter point is not that relevant any longer.  I thus went ahead and
applied the patch below.

Gerald

Remove the "[C++] Bugs fixed in the 3.4 series" subsection and migrate
the "Missing [C++] features" section to "Non-bugs -- C++", removing
their common ancestor.

Index: bugs.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs.html,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -3 -p -r1.96 bugs.html
--- bugs.html	24 Oct 2006 07:37:51 -0000	1.96
+++ bugs.html	2 Nov 2007 20:03:39 -0000
@@ -26,12 +26,6 @@
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane