2 Jul 2009 13:40
Thanks,
Richard.
6 Jul 2009 11:29
Slovak translation of kpackagekit
Hi,
I have translated kpackagekit (version 0.4.1.1) to Slovak language. It's commited to kde l10n (l10n.kde.org) in section playground-sysadmin file kpackagekit.po (http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/sk/messages/playground-sysadmin/kpackagekit.po?view=log).
Is there a way to commit this translation to official kpackagekit package?
I want to update translation of kpackagekit for the newest version, so how can I know, when a new version is ready for translation and how to commit it?
Thanks a lot.
<div><p>Hi,<br><br>I have translated kpackagekit (version 0.4.1.1) to Slovak language. It's commited to kde l10n (<a href="http://l10n.kde.org">l10n.kde.org</a>) in section playground-sysadmin file kpackagekit.po (<a href="http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/sk/messages/playground-sysadmin/kpackagekit.po?view=log">http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/sk/messages/playground-sysadmin/kpackagekit.po?view=log</a>).<br><br>Is there a way to commit this translation to official kpackagekit package?<br><br>I want to update translation of kpackagekit for the newest version, so how can I know, when a new version is ready for translation and how to commit it?<br><br>Thanks a lot.<br><br></p></div>
6 Jul 2009 12:33
PackageKit 0.5.0 released!
Today I released PackageKit 0.5.0. PackageKit release notes: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/packagekit/tree/NEWS Tarballs available here: http://www.packagekit.org/releases/ Thanks to all those who made this possible. Richard.
6 Jul 2009 13:16
Re: PackageKit 0.5.0 released!
Richard,
does the "- Make the PackageKit plugin available to firefox (Richard Hughes)" fix the issue where the browser plugin is not
working on Fedora 11, if so is this fix planned to be backported to 0.4.8?
On 07/06/2009 12:33 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
does the "- Make the PackageKit plugin available to firefox (Richard Hughes)" fix the issue where the browser plugin is not
working on Fedora 11, if so is this fix planned to be backported to 0.4.8?
On 07/06/2009 12:33 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
Today I released PackageKit 0.5.0. PackageKit release notes: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/packagekit/tree/NEWS Tarballs available here: http://www.packagekit.org/releases/ Thanks to all those who made this possible. Richard. _______________________________________________ PackageKit mailing list PackageKit-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit
<div> Richard,<br> does the "- Make the PackageKit plugin available to firefox (Richard Hughes)" fix the issue where the browser plugin is not<br> working on Fedora 11, if so is this fix planned to be backported to 0.4.8?<br><br> On 07/06/2009 12:33 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:15e53e180907060333u5f351ee7je960b0aaec02966f@..." type="cite"> Today I released PackageKit 0.5.0. PackageKit release notes: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/packagekit/tree/NEWS">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/packagekit/tree/NEWS</a> Tarballs available here: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.packagekit.org/releases/">http://www.packagekit.org/releases/</a> Thanks to all those who made this possible. Richard. _______________________________________________ PackageKit mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:PackageKit@...">PackageKit@...</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit</a> </blockquote> <br><br> </div>
6 Jul 2009 13:26
Re: PackageKit 0.5.0 released!
2009/7/6 Grant Williamson <traxtopel@...>: > Richard, > does the "- Make the PackageKit plugin available to firefox (Richard > Hughes)" fix the issue where the browser plugin is not > working on Fedora 11, if so is this fix planned to be backported to 0.4.8? It fixes half of the problem -- the rendering issue has still not been fixed, and is discussed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506270 Martin is looking at the problem, as it's probably a firefox regression (or now it rejects PK's invalid behaviour perhaps) that PK is just starting to hit. Interestingly, I tried to write a simple plugin in C to learn more about how plugins work, but hit the same problem as the PackageKit plugin. Anyone with firefox plugin experience is very welcome to give us a hand with this -- beer is promised for the person that finds the bug. Thanks! Richard.
6 Jul 2009 14:01
gnome-packagekit 2.27.3 released!
GNOME PackageKit is the name of the collection of PackageKit GUI tools for use in the GNOME desktop. gnome-packagekit release notes: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnome-packagekit/plain/NEWS Tarballs available here: http://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-packagekit/2.27/ This unstable release contains new code and important fixes since 2.27.2 was released. Richard
6 Jul 2009 18:34
Re: The patch to enable title with uri in update viewer
Hi Richard, Zhu, Peter J wrote on Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:20 PM > Hi Richard > Richard Hughes wrote on Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:03 PM >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Zhu, Peter >> J<peter.j.zhu@...> wrote: >>> Richard Hughes wrote on Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:24 PM >>>> Is this against git master? >>>> >>> Yes I found this is NOT accepted in master and then new release of gpk. Any reason? Thanks, Peter >> >> [hughsie <at> hughsie-laptop gnome-packagekit]$ git >> whatchanged src/gpk-update-viewer2.c fatal: ambiguous >> argument 'src/gpk-update-viewer2.c': unknown revision or >> path not in the working tree. >> >> We renamed gpk-update-viewer2.c to gpk-update-viewer.c a >> few months ago -- where are you getting your git >> checkout from? What's the output of ".git/FETCH_HEAD"? >> > > Sorry, as I sent in previous thread, I made a mistake > making diff than a local git tree. > > The correct one is: > > diff --git a/src/gpk-update-viewer.c > b/src/gpk-update-viewer.c > index 598ccd2..b46113d 100644 > --- a/src/gpk-update-viewer.c > +++ b/src/gpk-update-viewer.c > <at> <at> -1140,13 +1140,15 <at> <at> > gpk_update_viewer_add_description_link_item > (GtkTextBuffer *buffer, GtkTextIter { GtkTextTag *tag; > const gchar *uri; > + const gchar *text; > gint i; > > /* insert at end */ > gtk_text_buffer_insert_with_tags_by_name (buffer, iter, > title, -1, "para", NULL); > > - for (i=0; i<array->len; i++) { > + for (i=0; i<array->len; i+=2) { > uri = g_ptr_array_index (array, i); > + text = g_ptr_array_index (array, i+1); > gtk_text_buffer_insert (buffer, iter, "\n", -1); > gtk_text_buffer_insert (buffer, iter, "* ", -1); > tag = gtk_text_buffer_create_tag (buffer, NULL, > <at> <at> -1154,7 +1156,7 <at> <at> > gpk_update_viewer_add_description_link_item > (GtkTextBuffer *buffer, GtkTextIter "underline", > PANGO_UNDERLINE_SINGLE, NULL); g_object_set_data > (G_OBJECT (tag), "href", g_strdup (uri)); > - gtk_text_buffer_insert_with_tags (buffer, iter, uri, > -1, tag, NULL); + gtk_text_buffer_insert_with_tags > (buffer, iter, text, -1, tag, NULL); > gtk_text_buffer_insert (buffer, iter, ".", -1); } > gtk_text_buffer_insert (buffer, iter, "\n", -1); <at> <at> > -1183,7 +1185,7 <at> <at> gpk_update_viewer_get_uris (const > gchar *url_string) } > > /* copy into array */ > - for (i=0; i<length; i+=2) > + for (i=0; i<length; i++) > g_ptr_array_add (array, g_strdup (urls[i])); > > return array; > _______________________________________________ > PackageKit mailing list > PackageKit@... > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit
6 Jul 2009 20:13
Re: The patch to enable title with uri in update viewer
2009/7/6 Zhu, Peter J <peter.j.zhu@...>: > I found this is NOT accepted in master and then new release of gpk. Any reason? Yes, sorry, I forgot all about it. I've tried your patch, but I still quite like showing the URL instead of the text -- it lets the user see where the link is. I would appreciate feedback from other people on this, as I don't feel too strongly about it. Richard.
7 Jul 2009 12:29
Resuming an upgrade
Hi Does PackageKit re-initiate a discontinued upgrade? How to avoid the problem in this post? http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=225715 Rahul
7 Jul 2009 13:24
Re: Resuming an upgrade
2009/7/7 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@...>: > Does PackageKit re-initiate a discontinued upgrade? How to avoid the > problem in this post? Well, the user would get the bubble in a weeks time again, which isn't really ideal. Maybe we can just check the exit code of preupgrade and then schedule the upgrade again on next gpk-update-icon run. Does preupgrade have different exit codes for success and failure? Richard.
RSS Feed