Shane Smith | 1 May 2011 04:21
Picon
Favicon

RE: [gsc] Exchangers & EGC


> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:20:55 -0400
> From: jim@...
> To: gold-silver-crypto@...
> Subject: Re: [gsc] Exchangers & EGC
> 
> Shane Smith wrote:
> 
> > in past the knees.)
> 
> Shane, are you involved with Nanaimo Gold?

Jawohl! 

Exchanging since 2005. Robbed by the owners of the US gov 3 times. 

Well, at least I'm not in jail and haven't had my spleen kicked out yet!  		 	   		  
pintle | 2 May 2011 03:07
Favicon

[gsc] Bitcoin

Correct me if I'm wrong. It is my understanding that there is a limit to
 the amount of Bitcoin "tokens" that can be created. And, once the limit
has be hit, the "tokens" have to go to being controlled by a server
(choke point) to make sure they're not being counterfeited.

Yes? No?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-help@...
Contact: http://www.rayservers.com/

Shane Smith | 2 May 2011 04:48
Picon
Favicon

RE: [gsc] Bitcoin


> Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 21:07:33 -0400
> From: pintle@...
> To: gold-silver-crypto@...
> Subject: [gsc] Bitcoin
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong. It is my understanding that there is a limit to
> the amount of Bitcoin "tokens" that can be created. And, once the limit
> has be hit, the "tokens" have to go to being controlled by a server
> (choke point) to make sure they're not being counterfeited.
> 
> Yes? No?

hmm, no. The verification process does not change. It's a shared record, distributed P2P like bitorrent.
Once all the coins are mined out, voluntary spend fees keep the operators interested in the verifications.

You will get all the answers here in Satoshi's white paper
http://www.bitcoin.org/sites/default/files/bitcoin.pdf

Who are you quoting? We have been calling this stuff Bitcoin or coins, not tokens.

cheers!

Shane
  		 	   		  
Shane Smith | 2 May 2011 07:51
Picon
Favicon

RE: [gsc] Bitcoin


From the mailbag:

On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 07:52:22PM -0700, ****** wrote:

> Thats pretty cool. I see that you have made it live. I have been
> reading about Bitcoin and I don't fully understand the concept, how it
> doesn't seem to be backed by anything.

 
It's backed up by people's willingness to trade it for other valuable items, Liberty Reserve for example.
Bitcoin's inherent worth is it's utility as a vector for communicating value - private money
decentralised and impossible to stop is useful and therefore valued.

Sort of like fiat currency, Bitcoin is valued by the decree of it's users, but not by the decree of
government. I put up my Pecunix, Silverman his
silver coins, L2V their telephone services, Capulin coffee etc. etc.

That talk about the price of electricity somehow backing the issue was just confusion and
misunderstanding. It came from the idea that if the price to buy a bitcoin remained more than the price of
the electricity burned to mine a bitcoin, people would continue to mine. Of course, burned electricity
has no more value than burned firewood.

The mining process is really just a cool and novel way to issue the currency across the user base over time. I
can't think of another way to do it, to put the currency in the hands of the users without becoming a central
authority. The bticoin monetary constitution is inflexible. "in math we trust". You have to crack crypto
puzzles to bring the coins to exist. Once the 21,000,000 have been created, no more can be.

It's true that this mining exercise is like tail chasing, and that some electric energy is lost in the
process. It seems counter produtive to see air conditioners sucking up the juice to cool computers
(Continue reading)

Niels Dettenbach | 2 May 2011 13:24

Re: [gsc] Bitcoin

Am Montag 02 Mai 2011, 07:51:27 schrieb Shane Smith:
> > Thats pretty cool. I see that you have made it live. I have been
> > reading about Bitcoin and I don't fully understand the concept, how it
> > doesn't seem to be backed by anything.

If you want to dive into the "logic" behind Bitcoin and it's decentralized 
structure you may make you familiar with the p2p concept in general.

We still accepting Bitcoins within our company - even if we did not see any 
"limit" in creating further "bitcoin" like monetary networks at the time (may 
be i did not understand the Bitcoin strategy herein at the time...) we will 
use it especially for mini- to micropayments at least as long as it will be 
useful for that.

This means i'm not shure how far bitcoin is trustworthy to be a "money 
storage" system i.e. for long time usage. May be someone here could clearify 
this this a little bit more?...

best regards,

Niels.
--

-- 

---

  Niels Dettenbach
  ---
  Syndicat IT&Internet
  http://www.syndicat.com
  T.-Muentzer.-Str. 2, 37308 Heilbad Heiligenstadt - DE
(Continue reading)

Patrick Chkoreff | 2 May 2011 15:15
Favicon

Re: [gsc] Bitcoin, and Asset Allocation

Niels Dettenbach wrote, On 05/02/2011 07:24 AM:

> This means i'm not shure how far bitcoin is trustworthy to be a "money 
> storage" system i.e. for long time usage. May be someone here could clearify 
> this this a little bit more?...

All things fluctuate in value relative to other things.  Therefore I
must choose what percentage of my net worth I am willing to hold in each
specific thing, including bitcoin, gold, silver, USD, EUR, etc.  Either
I choose, or my emotions do it for me.

When you think in terms of percentage, the unit of account is
irrelevant.  It makes no difference whether you measure net worth in
terms of USD, gold grams, EUR, silver ounces, or even in bitcoin itself.
 The percentages are unchanged.

I cannot advise you on what percentages to use, nor will I disclose the
percentages I use.  I will say that I do not keep 100% of my assets in
any one thing, but that's not saying much, since who among us would ever
do that?

-- Patrick

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-help@...
Contact: http://www.rayservers.com/

pintle | 2 May 2011 19:19
Favicon

Re: [gsc] Bitcoin

Shane Smith wrote:

> You will get all the answers here in Satoshi's white paper
> http://www.bitcoin.org/sites/default/files/bitcoin.pdf

Thanks.

> Who are you quoting? 

Nobody.

> We have been calling this stuff Bitcoin or coins, not tokens.

Now that I think about it more it's unlike government fiat tokens in
that there is no debt associated with it. It's unlike currency in that
there is no redemption involved. It's more like money in that it is
final settlement except that there are no atoms involved.

I guess it's in a class by itself, coins of bits. Ok, I'll refer to it
as Bitcoin being a bitcoin.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-help@...
Contact: http://www.rayservers.com/

DGCMP | 2 May 2011 20:17

Re: [gsc] Bitcoin

On 05/02/2011 12:19 PM, pintle wrote:
> I guess it's in a class by itself, coins of bits. Ok, I'll refer to it
> as Bitcoin being a bitcoin.

Hence the term "Cryptocurrency" as a subset of Digital Cash.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-help@...
Contact: http://www.rayservers.com/

DGCMP | 2 May 2011 21:08

[gsc] Civilization Starter Kit

Using wikis and digital fabrication tools, TED Fellow Marcin Jakubowski
is open-sourcing the blueprints for 50 farm machines, allowing anyone to
build their own tractor or harvester from scratch. And that’s only the
first step in a project to write an instruction set for an entire
self-sustaining village (starting cost: $10,000).
http://justlive.us/physical/tools/civilization-starter-kit-video/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-help@...
Contact: http://www.rayservers.com/

Jim | 2 May 2011 22:38

Re: [gsc] Civilization Starter Kit


> first step in a project to write an instruction set for an entire
> self-sustaining village 

I'm always curious why villages have to be self-sustaining.

I mean, why can't they specialise and engage in trade and commerce?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: gold-silver-crypto-help@...
Contact: http://www.rayservers.com/


Gmane