headers
yaoaiguo | 1 Sep 2003 08:29

nfs+acl

Hello
  How can I make my linux2.4.20 support xfs+acl+nfs?
The site "http://acl.bestbits.at" provide patch for ext/ext3 filesystem, where
can I find patch for xfs? 
  I find someone ask this question before, but I did not find the answer.Who
can tell me?
Thanks.

--http://www.eyou.com
--Îȶ¨¿É¿¿µÄÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÐÅÏä  ÓïÒôÓʼþ  Òƶ¯ÊéÇ© 
ÈÕÀú·þÎñ  ÍøÂç´æ´¢...ÒÚÓÊδ¾¡
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ethan Benson | 1 Sep 2003 09:24
Picon
Favicon

Re: nfs+acl

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 02:29:19PM +0800, yaoaiguo wrote:
> Hello
>   How can I make my linux2.4.20 support xfs+acl+nfs?
> The site "http://acl.bestbits.at" provide patch for ext/ext3 filesystem, where
> can I find patch for xfs? 

xfs does not need a patch, it supports ACLs nativly.

>   I find someone ask this question before, but I did not find the answer.Who
> can tell me?
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --http://www.eyou.com
> --??????????????????????  ????????  ????????  ????????  ????????...????????
> 
> 

--

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
bugzilla-daemon | 1 Sep 2003 12:15
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 277] New: xfs_force_shutdown after kernel bug

http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277

           Summary: xfs_force_shutdown after kernel bug
           Product: Linux XFS
           Version: 1.2.x
          Platform: IA32
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: critical
          Priority: Medium
         Component: XFS kernel code
        AssignedTo: xfs-master <at> oss.sgi.com
        ReportedBy: til <at> belleville.ch

I have NFS serving XFS on top of softraid md1. Linux Distribution is Redhat 8.0, 
kernel is version 2.4.19, XFS is version 1.2.

After running this combination for about half a year without problems, I 
couldn't access the directory any more. 'ls' tells me it's empty, 'mount' tells 
me it's still mounted. Can't umount (busy), and can't shut down NFS.

Output of 'dmesg' follows:

xfs_iget_core: ambiguous vns: vp/0xd6ffe080, invp/0xd6ffe480
kernel BUG at debug.c:96!
invalid operand: 0000
CPU:    0
EIP:    0010:[<c0215b73>]    Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010246
eax: 00000040   ebx: 00000000   ecx: dec22000   edx: 00000000
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
James Pearson | 1 Sep 2003 18:39
Favicon

Re: pre [ANNOUNCE] XFS 1.3.0

Russell Cattelan wrote:
> 
> Ok it's official there on oss.sgi.com
> We'll do a more formal announcement when we
> are not so tired.
> 
> -Russell Cattelan
> cattelan <at> xfs.org

Is there going to be a formal announcement?
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ still refers to XFS Release 1.2.

Also, is there likely to be a 2.4.22 core patch for 1.3 in the near
future?

Thanks

James Pearson
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Nathan Scott | 2 Sep 2003 09:18
Picon
Favicon

Re: nfs+acl

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 02:29:19PM +0800, yaoaiguo wrote:
> Hello
>   How can I make my linux2.4.20 support xfs+acl+nfs?
> The site "http://acl.bestbits.at" provide patch for ext/ext3 filesystem, where
> can I find patch for xfs? 
>   I find someone ask this question before, but I did not find the answer.Who
> can tell me?

The XFS patches include XFS' native acl support already, no additional
XFS patches are necessary.  I have not tested the NFS patches on top
of XFS, so can't really say whether they interoperate well.  (let us
know!)

cheers.

--

-- 
Nathan
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ethan Benson | 2 Sep 2003 10:26
Picon
Favicon

Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:43:53AM +0100, Benjamin Pfitzner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> first of all thanks for publishing the XFS Filesystem.
> When will there be a patch for Kernel 2.4.22 be avaibale? What is the 

when they have finished with the government notifications for crypto
distribution. (2.4.22 integrates the crpyto api)

> diference between 2.4.22 and 2.4.22-unofficial?

-unofficial is from a non-SGI tree, and not offically blessed by SGI.

--

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
bugzilla-daemon | 2 Sep 2003 10:11
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 277] xfs_force_shutdown after kernel bug

http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277

------- Additional Comments From til <at> belleville.ch  2003-02-09 01:11 PDT -------
One correction of my original post: The partition in question is build on top of
software raid level 0 (striped), not 1.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Simon Matter | 2 Sep 2003 13:14

Re: XFS shutdown with 1.3.0

>> xfs_inotobp: xfs_imap()  returned an error 22 on md(9,8).  Returning
>> error.
>> xfs_iunlink_remove: xfs_inotobp()  returned an error 22 on md(9,8).
>> Returning error.
>> xfs_inactive:   xfs_ifree() returned an error = 22 on md(9,8)
>> xfs_force_shutdown(md(9,8),0x1) called from line 1846 of file
>> xfs_vnodeops.c.  Return address = 0xd08bd8c6
>> Filesystem "md(9,8)": I/O Error Detected.  Shutting down filesystem:
>> md(9,8)
>> Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
>
> Hmmm - seen a couple of these reports now, unfortunately I haven't
> come across it myself yet.  Someone else has a bugzilla bug open,
> it seems to be really difficult to trigger this one.
>

The only thing I did in that moment was removing a file of ~1.5G size with
rm file. Although there were some files open on this filesystem via NFS,
there was absolutely no activity.

>>
>> [root <at> xxl root]# xfs_check /dev/md8
>> xfs_check: warning - cannot get sector size from block device /dev/md8:
>> Invalid argument
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> this is where those bogus md "ictls" are coming from, btw.  Its
> fixed in more recent kernels, you can search lkml archives for
> recent Neil Brown patches and find the fix (its some missing code
> in md, and is harmless here).
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 10 comments |
headers
Net Llama! | 2 Sep 2003 15:21

Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:43:53AM +0100, Benjamin Pfitzner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > first of all thanks for publishing the XFS Filesystem.
> > When will there be a patch for Kernel 2.4.22 be avaibale? What is the
>
> when they have finished with the government notifications for crypto
> distribution. (2.4.22 integrates the crpyto api)

Could someone explain what this means?  Is this just beaurocratic red
tape, or is there some technical process behind this requirement?

--

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman				netllama <at> linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo		     http://netllama.ipfox.com
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Mike Burger | 2 Sep 2003 15:33

Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Net Llama! wrote:

> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:43:53AM +0100, Benjamin Pfitzner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > first of all thanks for publishing the XFS Filesystem.
> > > When will there be a patch for Kernel 2.4.22 be avaibale? What is the
> >
> > when they have finished with the government notifications for crypto
> > distribution. (2.4.22 integrates the crpyto api)
> 
> Could someone explain what this means?  Is this just beaurocratic red
> tape, or is there some technical process behind this requirement?

It's a legal/bureaucratic mess.  The US government has restrictions on the 
export of cryptographical technologies.  If you intend to make something 
available for international consumption, which has crypto capabilities, 
you need to make sure that it meets US federal guidelines or that it's 
approved, otherwise.

--

-- 
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org

Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000

To be notified of updates to the web site, send a message to:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |

Gmane