No Recruiting! Fully Automated! Never pay more than $10 per month..and EARN a thousand fold

Greetings Sheena Here!

 You can now earn up to
$3,904.00 per MONTH or more!* 
how about double it?
5,856.00 per MONTH or more!* & so on...
All this for just $10.75! Yes!...Yes!..Yes!..
with the This unique system
"Ladder Step Earning System with your $10.75 become $1000,000,_ _ _ or add zero if you like"!

That's correct, starting with just $10.75, you can easily build an enormous monthly income by gradually
climbing the Ladder with your downline. No more is your income limited by small 5-level deep commission
payments. No more do you have to promote that secondary "high dollar" program to make the big bucks. Some
people say that a 10 dollar program cannot generate a reasonable income in a reasonable amount of time. Not
only has this program proven them wrong in the past, the program has just created the ultimate earning
opportunity. That now brings you the best of both worlds..

Start small, build fast, climb the ladder, earn BIG! There's NOTHING stopping you from earning a massive
monthly income when you see how our new system will work for YOU...

NOW! what is $10,000 for just 10$.. 

You decide and no more thinkable actions!

Get in Here Fast for FREE to sign up 

:) http://ItsJust10.80t.com
:) http://ItsJust10.80t.com
:) http://ItsJust10.80t.com

Which kernel do I need to get sub-second timestamps in JFS?

I've got a server that still running 2.4.33 - I could aupgrade to
2.4.36.2, but would that give me subsecond timestamps? 

/Per Jessen, Zürich

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Re: Which kernel do I need to get sub-second timestamps in JFS?

On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 15:37 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> I've got a server that still running 2.4.33 - I could aupgrade to
> 2.4.36.2, but would that give me subsecond timestamps?

No.  You'll need to move up to a 2.6 kernel for that.

Shaggy
--

-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Re: Which kernel do I need to get sub-second timestamps in JFS?

Dave Kleikamp wrote:

> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 15:37 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
>> I've got a server that still running 2.4.33 - I could aupgrade to
>> 2.4.36.2, but would that give me subsecond timestamps?
> 
> No.  You'll need to move up to a 2.6 kernel for that.
> 

Thanks - I was afraid of that 

/Per Jessen, Zürich

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

You have yet to open your ecard.

Get the laughing funny postcard http://65.96.224.99/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Allocation policy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Allocation policy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Re: Allocation policy

On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 07:56 -0800, Mario Burks wrote:
> Is JFS intellegent that it will find free space big enough for a file
> to fit in? 

Not currently.  I'm trying to scrape together some time to make it
smarter.
> 
> Does it leave some room for the file to extend?

Again, no.
> 
> Where are the inodes stored? Are they stored all in one area like how
> NTFS stores all the inodes in one area called the MFT (master file
> table).
> 
They are allocated in 16 KB "inode extents" which each contain 32
inodes.  These can be allocated anywhere.
--

-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

problem with jfsutils 1.1.12

Hello,

I tried to upgrade to jfsutils-1.1.12 recently and it seems it has 
problems with fscking filesystems. It's quite annoying for me, since 
booting from root jfs partiton fails if I have 1.1.12 installed - even 
though filesystem was cleanly unmonted.

If I run jfs_fsck with 1.1.8 all goes well:

$ umount /dev/mapper/encsda6
$ jfs_fsck -f /dev/mapper/encsda6
jfs_fsck version 1.1.8, 03-May-2005
processing started: 3/8/2008 19.42.4
The current device is:  /dev/mapper/encsda6
Block size in bytes:  4096
Filesystem size in blocks:  92769342
**Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log
**Phase 1 - Check Blocks, Files/Directories, and  Directory Entries
**Phase 2 - Count links
**Phase 3 - Duplicate Block Rescan and Directory Connectedness
**Phase 4 - Report Problems
**Phase 5 - Check Connectivity
**Phase 6 - Perform Approved Corrections
**Phase 7 - Rebuild File/Directory Allocation Maps
**Phase 8 - Rebuild Disk Allocation Maps
371077368 kilobytes total disk space.
     13139 kilobytes in 1222 directories.
277407811 kilobytes in 36158 user files.
         0 kilobytes in extended attributes
    121724 kilobytes reserved for system use.
  93560972 kilobytes are available for use.
Filesystem is clean.

But with 1.1.12 I get this (this is run directly after first fsck and 
upgrade to latest jfsutils):

$ jfs_fsck -v -f /dev/mapper/encsda6
jfs_fsck version 1.1.12, 24-Aug-2007
processing started: 3/8/2008 19.44.53
The current device is:  /dev/mapper/encsda6
Open(...READ/WRITE EXCLUSIVE...) returned rc = 0
Primary superblock is valid.
The type of file system for the device is JFS.
Error (10035,25) writing to the fsck service log 
(2,379949465600,8192,0).  Continuing.
Block size in bytes:  4096
Filesystem size in blocks:  92769342
**Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log
LOGREDO:  Unable to read Journal Log superblock.
logredo failed (rc=-260).  fsck continuing.
**Phase 1 - Check Blocks, Files/Directories, and  Directory Entries
Unrecoverable error writing M to /dev/mapper/encsda6.  CANNOT CONTINUE.
Fatal error (-10028,25) accessing the workspace (2,379937865728,4096,0).
Unrecoverable error writing M to /dev/mapper/encsda6.  CANNOT CONTINUE.
Fatal error (-10028,-10028) accessing the workspace (2,0,4096,-1).
Unrecoverable error writing M to /dev/mapper/encsda6.  CANNOT CONTINUE.
Fatal error (-10028,25) accessing the workspace (2,379937865728,4096,0).
processing terminated:  3/8/2008 19:44:53  with return code: -10028 
exit code: 8.

Any ideas?

Above examples are run through device-mapper, but I get similar results 
on plain partitions too. System is slackware-10.2 based (glibc-2.3.6, 
gcc-3.3.6, kernel-2.6.24.3).

--
Miha

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Re: problem with jfsutils 1.1.12

On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Miha Verlic wrote:
> I tried to upgrade to jfsutils-1.1.12 recently and it seems it has
> problems with fscking filesystems. It's quite annoying for me, since

Is this vanilla jfsutils-1.1.12 or Slackware's version of 1.1.12? I'm 
asking because of: http://mark.foster.cc/blog/2008/01/jfs-112-problem-on-centos-4.html

(where some patch to 1.1.12 seems to have fixed it in this particular 
case)

C.
--

-- 
BOFH excuse #291:

Due to the CDA, we no longer have a root account.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/