1 Mar 01:06
1 Mar 03:19
Re: xen ov guest nfs
Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar <at> fajar.net>
2009-03-01 02:19:57 GMT
2009-03-01 02:19:57 GMT
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Denis J. Cirulis <denis <at> opensource.lv> wrote: > I tried AoE and iSCSI already, software iscsi target and initiator gives > me high cpu load on both domU and target. AoE was less resource hungry. High domU CPU? Seriously? Who's importing the iscsi target, dom0 or domU?
1 Mar 03:24
Re: Most of You Have Probably Seen This 100 Times, But...
Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar <at> fajar.net>
2009-03-01 02:24:17 GMT
2009-03-01 02:24:17 GMT
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Robinson, Eric <eric.robinson <at> psmnv.com> wrote: > Attempting to install a fully virtualized instance of Windows 2003 fails on > CentOS 5.2 x86_64 with xen-3.0.3-64.el5. > > After issuing the command... > > # virt-install --hvm -s 70 -f /vm/ts05/ts05.dsk -n ts05 --cdrom > /download/Win2003x64/disk1.iso --vnc -r 1024 I'd start with verifying that /vm/ts05/ts05.dsk and /download/Win2003x64/disk1.iso actually exists. Next, verify that udevd is istill running. Other than that, the most common problem is probably X display problem. Are you running it on a remote host or local X display? Regards, Fajar
1 Mar 05:56
RE: Slow outgoing IP traffic with PV drivers
James Harper <james.harper <at> bendigoit.com.au>
2009-03-01 04:56:25 GMT
2009-03-01 04:56:25 GMT
> Hi, > > I'm running Ubuntu 8.04 XEN with latest kernel as a dom0. I'm running > Windows 2003 SP1 as domU, where I also have installed the 0.9.11 PV > Drivers. Everything works fine except for the outgoing IP traffic from the > domU, which seems to be limited to a maximum of around 0.5 mbit. The > incoming IP traffic works fine. No limitations. If I start the dumU > without the PV drivers activated, the outgoing IP traffic is working like > normal. What am I doing wrong here? > Where is your IP traffic going? (to Dom0, to another DomU, or to a physical network adapter) If a physical network adapter, what sort? I'd start by turning off the available offloads in the advanced properties of the gplpv xennet adapter. James
1 Mar 06:51
RE: gplpv 0.9.11.13 and not work terminal service
James Harper <james.harper <at> bendigoit.com.au>
2009-03-01 05:51:45 GMT
2009-03-01 05:51:45 GMT
> > Not working terminal service in xen net drive, can not find a suitable > device. Back to 0.9.11.12, in working. > Can you explain a bit more about what you mean by 'terminal service'? Is it only the rdp service that isn't working? James
1 Mar 08:51
Re: xen ov guest nfs
Denis J. Cirulis <denis <at> opensource.lv>
2009-03-01 07:51:12 GMT
2009-03-01 07:51:12 GMT
Dom0. On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:19:57AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Denis J. Cirulis <denis <at> opensource.lv> wrote: > > I tried AoE and iSCSI already, software iscsi target and initiator gives > > me high cpu load on both domU and target. AoE was less resource hungry. > > High domU CPU? Seriously? Who's importing the iscsi target, dom0 or domU?
1 Mar 09:58
using Xen with logical volumes
Paola Salviato <psalviato <at> gmail.com>
2009-03-01 08:58:43 GMT
2009-03-01 08:58:43 GMT
Hello everybody, I'm trying to use Xen by installing the virtual machine on logical volumes. I'm using Scientific Linux 5 as host. Running the configuration file though gives me an error: no Kernel found. Is there anybody who's had a similar experience? paola
1 Mar 10:27
gplpv website and latest version
Thomas Goirand <thomas <at> goirand.fr>
2009-03-01 09:27:49 GMT
2009-03-01 09:27:49 GMT
James, I love what you did, it's really an amazing work, but I never found a website for it, and your download repository doesn't tell what version to use and what version is stable or in dev. Did you write a small home page? Any hope for it if it doesn't exist? Thomas
1 Mar 10:56
Re: using Xen with logical volumes
Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar <at> fajar.net>
2009-03-01 09:56:00 GMT
2009-03-01 09:56:00 GMT
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Paola Salviato <psalviato <at> gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everybody, > I'm trying to use Xen by installing the virtual machine on logical volumes. > I'm using Scientific Linux 5 as host. > Running the configuration file though gives me an error: no Kernel found. Is > there anybody who's had a similar experience? I'm assuming you mean using LV on dom0 as storage for domU's filesystem, right? The biggest difference between file and LVM-backed domUs is changing file:/ or tap:/aio with phy:/. Other then that, it should be the same. What is your domU config like? If you haven't been able to get any domU running, it might be easier to use virt-install or virt-manager.
1 Mar 11:05
Re: xen ov guest nfs
Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar <at> fajar.net>
2009-03-01 10:05:23 GMT
2009-03-01 10:05:23 GMT
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Denis J. Cirulis <denis <at> opensource.lv> wrote: > Dom0. That's strange. I tested domU on RHEL dom0, with storage located on iscsi-exported zfs volume from opensolaris, there's not much difference in domU CPU usage. I did notice substantial difference in domU I/O throughput due to the fact that I'm using 100Mbps switch instead of 1Gbps. What does "top" on domU say? Is the high load on "us", or is it on "sy" or "wa"? What does "iostat -x 3" on dom0 say? Is the iscsi-imported disk experiencing 100% util? If it IS I/O throughput problem, then iscsi, aoe, or nfs should be same: none of them would provide acceptable performance. If it's something else, then you can safely use nfs. > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:19:57AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Denis J. Cirulis <denis <at> opensource.lv> wrote: >> > I tried AoE and iSCSI already, software iscsi target and initiator gives >> > me high cpu load on both domU and target. AoE was less resource hungry. >> >> High domU CPU? Seriously? Who's importing the iscsi target, dom0 or domU? >
RSS Feed