Peter Blanchette | 2 Oct 15:59
Picon
Favicon

THIS IS NOT A SUPPORT NEWSLETTER

Please use the forums at pearpc.net if you need
support setting up pearpc.  This newsletter is for
news about developments in pearpc.  Lately all I've
seen are requests for help.  To those who apply, you
are misusing this resource.  You know who you are. 
Let's keep things where they belong and everyone will
be happy.  Besides - you'll get MUCH better support
over at pearpc.net.

		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
Simon Biber | 3 Oct 03:19
Picon

Re: THIS IS NOT A SUPPORT NEWSLETTER

Peter Blanchette wrote:
 > Please use the forums at pearpc.net if you need
 > support setting up pearpc.  This newsletter is for
 > news about developments in pearpc.  Lately all I've
 > seen are requests for help.  To those who apply, you
 > are misusing this resource.  You know who you are.
 > Let's keep things where they belong and everyone will
 > be happy.  Besides - you'll get MUCH better support
 > over at pearpc.net.

This, the pearpc-users mailing list, is indeed for users of PearPC to 
ask questions. It is open to posts from all members, and is not just an 
announcements list. I think it is you who has misunderstood its purpose.

The two official mailing lists, pearpc-users and pearpc-devel, are 
differentiated by the target subscriber -- users of PearPC on this list, 
and developers of PearPC on the pearpc-devel list. However, both are 
discussion lists, not announcement lists.

Your suggestion to use an unofficial web-forum may be of use to some 
users, but if they want to ask a question to the authors of PearPC, this 
is the officially-designated list to do it on.

Simon.

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
(Continue reading)

Peter Blanchette | 5 Oct 01:15
Picon
Favicon

Re: Pearpc-users digest, Vol 1 #161 - 2 msgs

I don't want to discourage anyone from receiving help.
 I see a lot of issues that can easily be solved by
reviewing the official (or unofficial) documentation
and FAQs.  I apologize for misunderstanding the
purpose of this mailing list, and I humbly request
that people do me, and themselves a favor, and search
for answers to common problems in the available online
resources before posting their questions here.

Here are some helpful links from the official website,
which I've copied the text from and added links to:

===============================================
Documentation
http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/doc.html

Unexperienced users please refer to external
documentation.

http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/doc.html#ext_doc

Many of your questions will be answered in the
Frequently asked questions section (FAQ)

http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/faq.html

or on the PearPC Wiki pages (for developers).

http://www.kelley.ca/pearpc/wiki

(Continue reading)

schristopheraz | 5 Oct 03:17
Picon
Favicon

Re: Re: Pearpc-users digest, Vol 1 #161 - 2 msgs

Besides bug tracking the official mailing list can also be a place for the developers to notice issues or questions about the software. Posting to the mail list I would imagine is highly recommended because then it gives everyone a chance to see the question. There have been times where information only the devs have have been released through them on the list that you probably wouldn't see otherwise.
 
I'll be the first one to tell you. I would check a reply on this list before PearPC.net any day. Calm down enjoy the software and if there is a admin problem of such then the devs admins will handle it.
 
-Shawn
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/04/05 16:18:14 US Mountain Standard Time, necide <at> yahoo.com writes:
I don't want to discourage anyone from receiving help.
I see a lot of issues that can easily be solved by
reviewing the official (or unofficial) documentation
and FAQs.  I apologize for misunderstanding the
purpose of this mailing list, and I humbly request
that people do me, and themselves a favor, and search
for answers to common problems in the available online
resources before posting their questions here.

Here are some helpful links from the official website,
which I've copied the text from and added links to:
 
Torsten Curdt | 11 Oct 12:43

(no subject)

Darwin is working fine but neither Tiger
nor Panther is starting up.

I've tried the native cdrom support under
linux and windows as well have I ripped
the ISOs and tried with that.

I can see the parition table

  cdrom0 (raw disk/raw)
  cdrom0 (Apple/Apple_partition_map)
  cdrom0 (Macintosh/Apple_Driver_ATAPI)
  cdrom0 (Mac_OS_X/Apple_HFS)
  cdrom0 (Apple Hardware Test/Apple_Boot)
  cdrom0 (/Apple_Free)

but PPC says that none of those is bootable.

What's up?

cheers
--
Torsten
Torsten Curdt | 11 Oct 12:46

cannot boot tiger or panther

Darwin is working fine but neither Tiger
nor Panther is starting up.

I've tried the native cdrom support under
linux and windows as well have I ripped
the ISOs and tried with that.

I can see the parition table

  cdrom0 (raw disk/raw)
  cdrom0 (Apple/Apple_partition_map)
  cdrom0 (Macintosh/Apple_Driver_ATAPI)
  cdrom0 (Mac_OS_X/Apple_HFS)
  cdrom0 (Apple Hardware Test/Apple_Boot)
  cdrom0 (/Apple_Free)

but PPC says that none of those is bootable.

What's up?

cheers
--
Torsten

Sebastian Biallas | 14 Oct 17:42

Re: cannot boot tiger or panther

Torsten Curdt wrote:

> Darwin is working fine but neither Tiger
> nor Panther is starting up.

Which version are you using?

> 
> I've tried the native cdrom support under
> linux and windows as well have I ripped
> the ISOs and tried with that.
> 
> I can see the parition table
> 
>  cdrom0 (raw disk/raw)
>  cdrom0 (Apple/Apple_partition_map)
>  cdrom0 (Macintosh/Apple_Driver_ATAPI)
>  cdrom0 (Mac_OS_X/Apple_HFS)
>  cdrom0 (Apple Hardware Test/Apple_Boot)
>  cdrom0 (/Apple_Free)
> 
> but PPC says that none of those is bootable.

Strange. Isn't there more debug output?

> 
> What's up?
> 
> cheers

Sebastian

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
Sebastian Biallas | 14 Oct 17:51

Re: project dead?

Jon Biddell wrote:

> Dexter Filmore wrote:
> 
>>Good to hear. Thought so since Apple announced switching to intel. Suspected
>>there might have been thoughts like "well, next year we'll be able to run osx
>>ony bloody piece of x86 anyway, why put in more effort."
> 
> From my contacts within Apple Australia, Mac OS/X will never run on
> non-Apple x86 hardware, as there will be Apple-specific BIOS patches to
> ensure that it will only work on Apple-supplied hardware. 

Well, it already /does/ run on non-Apple x86 hardware with some
cracker-specific patches which ensure that it will work on
non-Apple-supplied hardware. The genie is out of the bottle. (But this
is certainly unrelated to pearpc).

Sebastian

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl

Gmane