Re: OGR-NG stats

How many stubs are left and done?

On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:33 -0600, Mike wrote:
>  
> http://stats.distributed.net/projects.php?project_id=26
>  
> Mike
>  
>  
>         ----- Original Message ----- 
>         From: Dead J. Dona 
>         To: D.net Discussion 
>         Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:05 AM
>         Subject: Re: [RC5] OGR-NG stats
>         
>         
>         only bovine knows.
>         
>         2008/10/30 bert <bertodell@...>
>                 Anyone know when the OGR-NG stats page will be up?
>                 
>         -- 
>         ===
>         wbr, Me. Dead J. Dona
>         http://distributed.org.ua/
>          
>         
>         
>         ______________________________________________________________
>         

Re: OGR-NG stats

Looks like the Stubspace Status is up and running, still no Keyrate History 
yet.

http://stats.distributed.net/project/ogr_status.php?project_id=26

Mike 

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

Re: OGR-NG stats

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

Automatic Startup on Debian

Hello,

I am using Debian GNU/Linux. Is it there's a way to run my dnetc
client automatically every time my computer restart?

--

-- 
Zaki Akhmad
_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

Re: Automatic Startup on Debian

Zaki Akhmad wrote:
> I am using Debian GNU/Linux. Is it there's a way to run my dnetc
> client automatically every time my computer restart?

http://faq.distributed.net/cache/251.html

--

-- 
                       _
Aaron Toponce         ( )  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
www.aarontoponce.org   X   www.asciiribbon.org
                      / \

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

More stats

Is it possible to add a few more stats to the projects? EG:

 * FLOPS/s
 * Participant and team stats for "CPU Years"

Just a thought.

--

-- 
                       _
Aaron Toponce         ( )  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
www.aarontoponce.org   X   www.asciiribbon.org
                      / \

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

Re: More stats

I think either of these measures would be a bit misleading.

A measurement of MIPS, not FLOPS, would vary significantly if measured per 
stat unit based on the CPU architecture and speed.  What I mean is, an 
operation that takes 2 CPU cycles on an AMD may take only 1 on a Cell, and 
the same operation may take 3 on a SPARC without even comparing the speed of 
the CPU in ghz.

I think the same goes for CPU year. The amount of work done by a P2 300 in a 
year vs a 3ghz Xeon or a PS3 Cell varies greatly.  I suppose one could pic a 
baseline cpu to base CPU years on much like on the proxy rate page for rc5.. 
This would work for MIPS or CPU years - but these would both be a direct 
function of stats units per day.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for more geek stats, but I think we could be 
comparing apples and oranges..

I am interested to hear any other opinions on this one :)

Mike

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

v507 and v507b/c versiond of the Win32 client

What are the differences between v507 and v507b/c versions of the Win32 
client?  There is no mention of it in the changes.txt.

--Joseph
_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

Re: v507 and v507b/c versiond of the Win32 client

507b includes a few minor fixes that were added after 507 was built.
507c is just the MSI installer version of 507b as the note on the 
download page mentions.

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Joseph Kaye wrote:

> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:25:29 -0600
> From: Joseph Kaye <jkaye@...>
> Reply-To: D.net Discussion <rc5@...>
> To: D.net Discussion <rc5@...>
> Subject: [RC5] v507 and v507b/c versiond of the Win32 client
> 
> What are the differences between v507 and v507b/c versions of the Win32
> client?  There is no mention of it in the changes.txt.
>
>
> --Joseph
> _______________________________________________
> rc5 mailing list
> rc5@...
> http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
>

---
Steven Nikkel
steven_nikkel@...
_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

Re: v507 and v507b/c versiond of the Win32 client

Thanks! 

If I am running v507, is there any need to update to the b version?  I 
was unable to find any bug info on 507, so I am guessing not.

--Joseph

Steven Nikkel wrote:
> 507b includes a few minor fixes that were added after 507 was built.
> 507c is just the MSI installer version of 507b as the note on the 
> download page mentions.
>
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Joseph Kaye wrote:
>
>   
>> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:25:29 -0600
>> From: Joseph Kaye <jkaye@...>
>> Reply-To: D.net Discussion <rc5@...>
>> To: D.net Discussion <rc5@...>
>> Subject: [RC5] v507 and v507b/c versiond of the Win32 client
>>
>> What are the differences between v507 and v507b/c versions of the Win32
>> client?  There is no mention of it in the changes.txt.
>>
>>
>> --Joseph
>> _______________________________________________
>> rc5 mailing list
>> rc5@...
>> http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
>>
>>     
>
> ---
> Steven Nikkel
> steven_nikkel@...
> _______________________________________________
> rc5 mailing list
> rc5@...
> http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
>
>   

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5