Thorsten Wolf | 2 Oct 2003 08:11
Picon
Picon

Re: Three new cores - binary version -- new BETA

Hello List.

Bovine has written in his .plan, that new beta's are available... but
no need to hurry for a download, NO NEW CORES for the x86 generation
have been included....

Sincerely,

Thorsten Wolf

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

Timofey Spirin | 2 Oct 2003 08:23
Picon

OGR in v2.9007-486 pre-release is slower than v2.9005-483

I just download new pre-release and notice some slowdown in OGR.

Is that normal? I have 3-4% speed decrease.

dnetc v2.9005-483-GTR-03033120 for Win32 (WindowsNT 5.0).
Using email address (distributed.net ID) 'boroda@...'

[Oct 02 06:14:17 UTC] Automatic processor type detection found
                      an Intel Pentium III processor.
[Oct 02 06:14:17 UTC] OGR: using core #0 (GARSP 5.13-A).
[Oct 02 06:14:37 UTC] OGR: Benchmark for core #0 (GARSP 5.13-A)
                      0.00:00:17.21 [5,519,695 nodes/sec]
[Oct 02 06:14:37 UTC] OGR: using core #1 (GARSP 5.13-B).
[Oct 02 06:14:56 UTC] OGR: Benchmark for core #1 (GARSP 5.13-B)
                      0.00:00:17.12 [5,525,211 nodes/sec]

dnetc v2.9007-486-GTR-03092109 for Win32 (WindowsNT 5.0).
Using email address (distributed.net ID) 'boroda@...'

[Oct 02 06:15:26 UTC] Automatic processor type detection found
                      an Intel Pentium III processor.
[Oct 02 06:15:26 UTC] OGR: using core #0 (GARSP 5.13-A).
[Oct 02 06:15:45 UTC] OGR: Benchmark for core #0 (GARSP 5.13-A)
                      0.00:00:16.37 [5,309,855 nodes/sec]
[Oct 02 06:15:45 UTC] OGR: using core #1 (GARSP 5.13-B).
[Oct 02 06:16:04 UTC] OGR: Benchmark for core #1 (GARSP 5.13-B)
                      0.00:00:16.51 [5,305,013 nodes/sec]

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
(Continue reading)

Elektron | 2 Oct 2003 10:17
Picon
Favicon

Re: OGR in v2.9007-486 pre-release is slower than v2.9005-483


On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 14:23 Asia/Hong_Kong, Timofey Spirin wrote:

> I just download new pre-release and notice some slowdown in OGR.
>
> Is that normal? I have 3-4% speed decrease.

Your 483 numbers show GARSP-A slower than GARSP-B, while your 486 
numbers show GARSP-A faster than GARSP-B.

So unless the cores have been majorly tweaked, I'm thinking it might be 
other processes running.

- Purr

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

adream | 2 Oct 2003 12:23

Re: lists.distributed.net web/mail downtime

is there a problem with the rc5-72 team server ?

i dont seem to be able to edit my team or allow others to join it

regards

adrian

>The lists.distributed.net server will be offline for maintenance this
>weekend from approximatly noon EDT friday (September 26th) until monday
>afternoon (September 29th).
>
>All mail will be queued until the maintenance is completed.
>
>
>
>------
>                       Please encrypt anything important.
>    PGP Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6CFA486D
>"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
>     temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety " - Benjamin Franklin
>
>_______________________________________________
>rc5 mailing list
>rc5@...
>http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
(Continue reading)

Andreas Landmark | 2 Oct 2003 12:55

Re: lists.distributed.net web/mail downtime

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:23:02AM +0100, adream wrote:
> is there a problem with the rc5-72 team server ?
> 
> i dont seem to be able to edit my team or allow others to join it
> 

AFAIK team editing isn't ported to the new pgsql-statsbase as of yet, it
will come back online when somebody has ported it...

--

-- 
Andreas D Landmark / noXtension
"I think sex is better than logic, but I can't prove it."
_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

adream | 2 Oct 2003 14:13

Re: lists.distributed.net web/mail downtime

thanks for the info andreas

regards

adrian

>On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:23:02AM +0100, adream wrote:
>>  is there a problem with the rc5-72 team server ?
>>
>>  i dont seem to be able to edit my team or allow others to join it
>>
>
>AFAIK team editing isn't ported to the new pgsql-statsbase as of yet, it
>will come back online when somebody has ported it...
>
>--
>Andreas D Landmark / noXtension
>"I think sex is better than logic, but I can't prove it."
>_______________________________________________
>rc5 mailing list
>rc5@...
>http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

Jim Reisert AD1C | 2 Oct 2003 14:20
Picon
Favicon

Re: OGR in v2.9007-486 pre-release is slower than v2.9005-483

Unfortunately, none of the new cores are included.

:-(

- Jim

--

-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@...>, http://www.ad1c.com
PGP Fingerprint: D8E2 3D78 339F A7F1 8C13  1193 B5D1 4FB6 79D1 70DC

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

Stephane Leon | 2 Oct 2003 21:00
Picon
Favicon

PowerBook Alu performance

Hello,

This is a benchmark on alu 15" running at 1.25 Ghz, with
512 Mb.

dnetc v2.9005-484-CTR-03042809 for Mac OS X (Darwin 6.7).
Please provide the *entire* version descriptor when submitting bug 
reports.
The distributed.net bug report pages are at 
http://www.distributed.net/bugs/

[Oct 02 18:46:14 UTC] Automatic processor type detection found
                       a PowerPC 7450 (G4) processor.
[Oct 02 18:46:14 UTC] OGR: using core #0 (GARSP 5.13 Scalar).
[Oct 02 18:46:32 UTC] OGR: Benchmark for core #0 (GARSP 5.13 Scalar)
                       0.00:00:16.34 [13,104,246 nodes/sec]
[Oct 02 18:46:32 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (KKS 7450).
[Oct 02 18:46:50 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (KKS 7450)
                       0.00:00:16.07 [13,153,177 keys/sec]

Altivec seems better than G5 !

Sincerely,

--
Stephane

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5@...
(Continue reading)

adream | 2 Oct 2003 22:37

Re: PowerBook Alu performance

yup im getting 26.4 mkeys/s witha dual 1.25 mdd G4

kinda feel sorry for the guys with pc's

hope the g5 core is sorted soon, not that i can afford one ;¬)

regards

adrian

>Hello,
>
>This is a benchmark on alu 15" running at 1.25 Ghz, with
>512 Mb.
>
>
>dnetc v2.9005-484-CTR-03042809 for Mac OS X (Darwin 6.7).
>Please provide the *entire* version descriptor when submitting bug reports.
>The distributed.net bug report pages are at http://www.distributed.net/bugs/
>
>[Oct 02 18:46:14 UTC] Automatic processor type detection found
>                       a PowerPC 7450 (G4) processor.
>[Oct 02 18:46:14 UTC] OGR: using core #0 (GARSP 5.13 Scalar).
>[Oct 02 18:46:32 UTC] OGR: Benchmark for core #0 (GARSP 5.13 Scalar)
>                       0.00:00:16.34 [13,104,246 nodes/sec]
>[Oct 02 18:46:32 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (KKS 7450).
>[Oct 02 18:46:50 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (KKS 7450)
>                       0.00:00:16.07 [13,153,177 keys/sec]
>
>Altivec seems better than G5 !
(Continue reading)

chandler sobel-sörenson | 3 Oct 2003 02:44
Picon

Re: PowerBook Alu performance

why are the powerpc rates so much faster than the other?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "adream" <adream@...>
To: "D.net Discussion" <rc5@...>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [RC5] PowerBook Alu performance

> yup im getting 26.4 mkeys/s witha dual 1.25 mdd G4
>
> kinda feel sorry for the guys with pc's
>
> hope the g5 core is sorted soon, not that i can afford one ;¬)
>
> regards
>
> adrian
>
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >This is a benchmark on alu 15" running at 1.25 Ghz, with
> >512 Mb.
> >
> >
> >dnetc v2.9005-484-CTR-03042809 for Mac OS X (Darwin 6.7).
> >Please provide the *entire* version descriptor when submitting bug
reports.
> >The distributed.net bug report pages are at
http://www.distributed.net/bugs/
> >
(Continue reading)


Gmane