1 Oct 2007 19:36
Re: Why a different syntax for projects and contexts?
it depends on what/how you're using it. If you use project.sh, for instance you definitely what to distinguish projects from context.
On 9/30/07,
felciano <felciano-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Hi --
Is there any pragmatic or functional reason to keep the project and
context syntaxes different? For example:
<at> weekend <at> homeimprovement Fix the screen door
<at> weekend <at> homeimprovement Fix the screen door
It seems like both are useful for grouping, selecting items for a
report, etc. Why distinguish?
Ramon
__._,_.___Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
> If you would like to describe how you think it should work then
> someone might agree and modify todo.py!
From where I sit, I'd todo.txt to keep entries in a vimoutliner .otl file.
when creating an item, todo.whatever should look for a line in the file
that matches the project, and slap the new todo under that. If I go and
indent the task, using vimoutliner, todo.scriptinglanguage should then see
that as a child task. todo.youknowwhat should otherwise ignore any line that doesn't
start with (SINGLEUPPERCASEALPHA)
That way I could keep the todos neatly with other info and notes about the
project, in a magical folding text file.
but that's just me.
also, I'd like to be able to do the same thing with "remind" entries.
djp
RSS Feed