Kacper Wysocki | 2 Mar 2007 23:23
Picon
Picon

Re: ROX-Filer 2.6

On 2/27/07, Tony Houghton <h <at> realh.co.uk> wrote:
> In <367a23780702271212i9ca4d78ua348c666578db125 <at> mail.gmail.com>, Kacper Wysocki wrote:
> What's really confusing is that some X types with 32 in the name (eg
> CARD32 IIRC) are 64-bit on 64-bit architectures. I think it must be
> because the API defines them as explicitly being the same as long int.

Oh wow, that's bloody terrible! Sounds like a bug in the X types if
you ask me... then again, there's all kind of surprising weirdness
with the x64 extensions. After a full week of wrapping types and
dealing with really obscure bitwidth and alginment bugs, I really wish
more code used 'u32' and 's64' types - simple, short, and you always
know what the intended type really was.

> And I don't really want to know how this works when running an X server
> and client on two different architectures!

AFAIK there has never been any problems running 64bit sparc X clients
againt a 32bit Xsever, or the other way around - I believe X was
written with that firmly in mind - but I'm not going to presume as
much considering I haven't looked at the code at all.

Cheers,
 -Kacper

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
(Continue reading)

Thomas Leonard | 3 Mar 2007 10:08
Picon
Gravatar

Re: ROX-Filer 2.6

On 2/28/07, Arnaud Calvo <arnaud <at> calvo-france.com> wrote:
> Le Dim 25 février 2007 20:12, Thomas Leonard a écrit :
> > ROX-Filer 2.6 (the file manager at the core of the ROX desktop) has been
> > released.
>
> Hi Thomas
>
> Here is the update of the french rox manual. Sorry I'm so in late...

Applied! Let me know if you want subversion access...

Thanks,

--

-- 
Dr Thomas Leonard		http://rox.sourceforge.net
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6  8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Arnaud Calvo | 3 Mar 2007 12:01

Re: ROX-Filer 2.6


Le Sam 3 mars 2007 10:08, Thomas Leonard a écrit :
> Applied! Let me know if you want subversion access...

No, thanks !
I don't have time to learn that for the moment... ;)

Have a nice day !

--

-- 
Arnaud - GPG 0x41B507C7

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Thomas Leonard | 3 Mar 2007 12:14
Picon
Gravatar

Re: ROX-Filer 2.6

On 3/3/07, Arnaud Calvo <arnaud <at> calvo-france.com> wrote:
>
> Le Sam 3 mars 2007 10:08, Thomas Leonard a écrit :
> > Applied! Let me know if you want subversion access...
>
> No, thanks !
> I don't have time to learn that for the moment... ;)

There isn't really anything to learn (since you already know how to
check it out). The steps are:

1. Get ROX-Filer:

$ svn co https://rox.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/rox/trunk/rox

2. Update src/Docs/Manual-fr.xml as usual:

$ cd rox/ROX-Filer/src/Docs
...

3. Commit the changes (from the Docs directory):

$ svn commit

--

-- 
Dr Thomas Leonard		http://rox.sourceforge.net
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6  8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
(Continue reading)

Kacper Wysocki | 4 Mar 2007 13:58
Picon
Picon

ROX-Filer compile on x64

So I'm trying to compile ROX-Filer through 0install on my x64
computer, but I keep getting "Internal error: required source
components not found!" without any indication as to which component it
can't find.

 I remember Thomas mentioning that some headers were missing - what
needs to be done here?

Cheers,
  -Kacper

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Kacper Wysocki | 4 Mar 2007 14:26
Picon
Picon

Re: ROX-Filer compile on x64

On 3/4/07, Kacper Wysocki <kacperw <at> online.no> wrote:
> So I'm trying to compile ROX-Filer through 0install on my x64
> computer, but I keep getting "Internal error: required source
> components not found!" without any indication as to which component it
> can't find.

Please ignore. Apparently "Interface Properties" > "Compile" didn't
check to see if 0compile was present, while right-clicking
"ROX-Filer"-> "Compile" did, and downloaded 0compile for me. Actually,
don't ignore... this seems to be a bug?

>  I remember Thomas mentioning that some headers were missing - what
> needs to be done here?

However, it still doesn't build properly:

(errors on build):
pkg-config reports GTK version is now 2.4.14
Note: library 'atkmm-1.6' with major version 1 not found!
Note: library 'pangomm-1.4' with major version 1 not found!
Note: library 'glibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4' with major version 1 not found!
Note: library 'gtkmm-2.4' with major version 1 not found!
Note: library 'glibmm-2.4' with major version 1 not found!
Note: library 'gdkmm-2.4' with major version 1 not found!
Exiting GTK 2.4 environment

Then, on run:
(ROX-Filer:19707): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_string_insert_c: assertion `pos
<= string->len' failed

(Continue reading)

Kacper Wysocki | 4 Mar 2007 15:14
Picon
Picon

Re: More DeviceHandler issues

On 2/27/07, Tony Houghton <h <at> realh.co.uk> wrote:
[snip]

cool! There's more though - I can't install DeviceHandler on Edgy/x64
because CDDB-Py is only available for i386. It'd be sweet if this also
had src available through 0compile.

-K

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Thomas Leonard | 4 Mar 2007 16:59
Picon
Gravatar

Re: ROX-Filer compile on x64

On 3/4/07, Kacper Wysocki <kacperw <at> online.no> wrote:
> Please ignore. Apparently "Interface Properties" > "Compile" didn't
> check to see if 0compile was present, while right-clicking
> "ROX-Filer"-> "Compile" did, and downloaded 0compile for me. Actually,
> don't ignore... this seems to be a bug?

Sounds odd. They both call the same code. Can you reproduce it (e.g.
after removing 0compile from the cache)?

> >  I remember Thomas mentioning that some headers were missing - what
> > needs to be done here?

The GLib headers were marked as suitable for 'any' arch, even though
they're i386-specific. I've fixed that, which means that it should no
longer allow you to compile on x64.

On the plus side, I've added a 'Compile' option to the glib headers
(it will download the GLib source code and compile them to get the
headers). Please test!

> However, it still doesn't build properly:
>
> (errors on build):
> pkg-config reports GTK version is now 2.4.14
> Note: library 'atkmm-1.6' with major version 1 not found!

The 'mm' errors are about missing C++ headers, but ROX-Filer doesn't
need them so don't worry about it.

> Then, on run:
(Continue reading)

Kacper Wysocki | 4 Mar 2007 18:19
Picon
Picon

Re: ROX-Filer compile on x64

On 3/4/07, Thomas Leonard <talex5 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/4/07, Kacper Wysocki <kacperw <at> online.no> wrote:
> > Please ignore. Apparently "Interface Properties" > "Compile" didn't
> > check to see if 0compile was present, while right-clicking
> > "ROX-Filer"-> "Compile" did, and downloaded 0compile for me. Actually,
> > don't ignore... this seems to be a bug?
>
> Sounds odd. They both call the same code. Can you reproduce it (e.g.
> after removing 0compile from the cache)?

Actually, no. After removing 0compile it downloads as normal, no
matter which way I access it.

> On the plus side, I've added a 'Compile' option to the glib headers
> (it will download the GLib source code and compile them to get the
> headers). Please test!
[ ... compile glib and rox-filer through 0install]
> Does that work?

Yes, works like a charm now, thanks!

-K

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Jona Joachim | 14 Mar 2007 18:56
X-Face

ROX-Filer + GPG

Hi!
This is my first post to this newsgroup :)
A friend just told me that he can encrypt or sign files with gpg in 
nautilus. This seems like a useful feature. As a ROX user I wonder if it 
is possible to include such a feature in ROX. Is there an easy way to 
script ROX?

Regards,
Jona

--

-- 
"I am chaos. I am the substance from which your artists and scientists 
build rhythms. I am the spirit with which your children and clowns laugh 
in happy anarchy. I am chaos. I am alive, and tell you that you are free."
Eris, Goddess Of Chaos, Discord & Confusion

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

Gmane