unixODBC developer's list

anand.vasudevan | 11 May 2006 13:44

Timestamp in the unixODBC log file


Hi all,

I have the following entry in my odbcinst.ini file: -

[ODBC]
Trace           = Yes
TraceFile               = /tmp/sql.log
ForceTrace              = Yes
Pooling         = Yes

I get the following log messages in the /tmp/sql.log file: -

[ODBC][23545][SQLAllocHandle.c][463]
                Exit:[SQL_SUCCESS]
                        Output Handle = 11c340
[ODBC][23545][SQLSetConnectAttr.c][318]
                Entry:
                        Connection = 11c340
                        Attribute = SQL_ATTR_LOGIN_TIMEOUT
                        Value = 5
                        StrLen = 0
[ODBC][23545][SQLSetConnectAttr.c][500]
                Exit:[SQL_SUCCESS]
[ODBC][23545][SQLConnect.c][3549]
                Entry:
                        Connection = 11c340
                        Server Name = [testdb][length = 14 (SQL_NTS)]
                        User Name = [usr][length = 6 (SQL_NTS)]
                        Authentication = [******][length = 6 (SQL_NTS)]

(Continue reading)

Nick Gorham | 11 May 2006 14:15

Re: Timestamp in the unixODBC log file

anand.vasudevan <at> wipro.com wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have the following entry in my odbcinst.ini file: -
> 
> [ODBC]
> Trace           = Yes
> TraceFile               = /tmp/sql.log
> ForceTrace              = Yes
> Pooling         = Yes
> 
> 
> I get the following log messages in the /tmp/sql.log file: -
> 
> [ODBC][23545][SQLAllocHandle.c][463]
>                 Exit:[SQL_SUCCESS]
>                         Output Handle = 11c340
> [ODBC][23545][SQLSetConnectAttr.c][318]
>                 Entry:
>                         Connection = 11c340
>                         Attribute = SQL_ATTR_LOGIN_TIMEOUT
>                         Value = 5
>                         StrLen = 0
> [ODBC][23545][SQLSetConnectAttr.c][500]
>                 Exit:[SQL_SUCCESS]
> [ODBC][23545][SQLConnect.c][3549]
>                 Entry:
>                         Connection = 11c340
>                         Server Name = [testdb][length = 14 (SQL_NTS)]
>                         User Name = [usr][length = 6 (SQL_NTS)]

(Continue reading)

Igor Korot | 11 May 2006 21:29

Picon

unixODBC-2.2.12 with QT4

Hi, Nick,
There is a bug report on the Gentoo Linux site against this configuration.
The report says, that the unixODBC -2.2.12 failed to build with the qt4 installed.

Can you confirm?

Thank you.
_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
unixODBC-dev <at> easysoft.com
http://mail.easysoft.com/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev

Nick Gorham | 12 May 2006 00:56

Re: unixODBC-2.2.12 with QT4

Igor Korot wrote:

>Hi, Nick,
>There is a bug report on the Gentoo Linux site against this configuration.
>The report says, that the unixODBC -2.2.12 failed to build with the qt4 installed.
>
>Can you confirm?
>  
>
No,

Any chance you could give more information?

Actually, it would be hard to provide less information.

Remember 2.2.12 IS NOT RELEASED, no one should be using it, and if they 
are, shouldn't be upset when it fails. I do need to get it released, but 
I am still working at adding the unicode odbcinst functions at the moment.

--

-- 
Nick
_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
unixODBC-dev <at> easysoft.com
http://mail.easysoft.com/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev

Stefan Radman | 12 May 2006 07:04

RE: unixODBC-2.2.12 with QT4

Nick,

> Remember 2.2.12 IS NOT RELEASED, no one should be using it, 

I remember at least one case in the past where it people used a CVS
snapshot tarball thinking it was the next released version (e.g. PLD
Linux).

To avoid similar confusion in the future I'd like to propose that in the
future the version in the CVS is always labeled "pre" (e.g. 2.2.12pre)
prior to release so that any tarballs (and RPMs) generated from it are
clearly labelled as PRE-RELEASE.
What do you think?

Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: unixodbc-dev-bounces <at> easysoft.com 
> [mailto:unixodbc-dev-bounces <at> easysoft.com] On Behalf Of Nick Gorham
> Sent: Friday, 12 May, 2006 00:56
> To: Igor Korot; Development issues and topics for unixODBC
> Subject: Re: [unixODBC-dev] unixODBC-2.2.12 with QT4
> 
> Igor Korot wrote:
> 
> >Hi, Nick,
> >There is a bug report on the Gentoo Linux site against this 
> configuration.
> >The report says, that the unixODBC -2.2.12 failed to build 
> with the qt4 installed.
> >

(Continue reading)

Nick Gorham | 12 May 2006 08:50

Re: unixODBC-2.2.12 with QT4

Stefan Radman wrote:

>Nick,
>
>  
>
>>Remember 2.2.12 IS NOT RELEASED, no one should be using it, 
>>    
>>
>
>I remember at least one case in the past where it people used a CVS
>snapshot tarball thinking it was the next released version (e.g. PLD
>Linux).
>
>To avoid similar confusion in the future I'd like to propose that in the
>future the version in the CVS is always labeled "pre" (e.g. 2.2.12pre)
>prior to release so that any tarballs (and RPMs) generated from it are
>clearly labelled as PRE-RELEASE.
>What do you think?
>  
>
Yes, that would be a good idea. I will do that.

--

-- 
Nick
_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
unixODBC-dev <at> easysoft.com
http://mail.easysoft.com/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev

(Continue reading)

Stefan Radman | 12 May 2006 10:52

RE: unixODBC-2.2.12 with QT4

configure.in: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(unixODBC, 2.2.12pre)
unixODBC.spec: unixODBC.spec:%define ver      2.2.12pre

Should be enough, right?

Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: unixodbc-dev-bounces <at> easysoft.com 
> [mailto:unixodbc-dev-bounces <at> easysoft.com] On Behalf Of Nick Gorham
> Sent: Friday, 12 May, 2006 08:50
> To: Development issues and topics for unixODBC
> Subject: Re: [unixODBC-dev] unixODBC-2.2.12 with QT4
> 
> Stefan Radman wrote:
> 
> >Nick,
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Remember 2.2.12 IS NOT RELEASED, no one should be using it, 
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I remember at least one case in the past where it people used a CVS
> >snapshot tarball thinking it was the next released version (e.g. PLD
> >Linux).
> >
> >To avoid similar confusion in the future I'd like to propose 
> that in the
> >future the version in the CVS is always labeled "pre" (e.g.

(Continue reading)

Nick Gorham | 12 May 2006 11:10

Re: unixODBC-2.2.12 with QT4

Stefan Radman wrote:
> configure.in: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(unixODBC, 2.2.12pre)
> unixODBC.spec: unixODBC.spec:%define ver      2.2.12pre
> 
> Should be enough, right?

Yep, that should do it.

--

-- 
Nick
_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
unixODBC-dev <at> easysoft.com
http://mail.easysoft.com/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev

anand.vasudevan | 15 May 2006 09:30

RE: Timestamp in the unixODBC log file


We are using unixODBC-2.2.7 which is available as a Solaris package on
the unixODBC site.
Is there a place where I can get the source code of this version to make
the change mentioned by you?

Regards
Anand

-----Original Message-----
From: unixodbc-dev-bounces <at> easysoft.com
[mailto:unixodbc-dev-bounces <at> easysoft.com] On Behalf Of Nick Gorham
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:46 PM
To: Development issues and topics for unixODBC
Subject: Re: [unixODBC-dev] Timestamp in the unixODBC log file

anand.vasudevan <at> wipro.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have the following entry in my odbcinst.ini file: -
>
> [ODBC]
> Trace           = Yes
> TraceFile               = /tmp/sql.log
> ForceTrace              = Yes
> Pooling         = Yes
>
>
> I get the following log messages in the /tmp/sql.log file: -
>

(Continue reading)

Nick Gorham | 15 May 2006 11:07

Re: Timestamp in the unixODBC log file

anand.vasudevan <at> wipro.com wrote:

>We are using unixODBC-2.2.7 which is available as a Solaris package on
>the unixODBC site.
>Is there a place where I can get the source code of this version to make
>the change mentioned by you?
>
>  
>
ftp://ftp.easysoft.com/pub/unixODBC

--

-- 
Nick Gorham
Easysoft Limited
http://www.easysoft.com, http://www.unixODBC.org

_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
unixODBC-dev <at> easysoft.com
http://mail.easysoft.com/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev

Group

gmane.comp.db.unixodbc.devel.

Project Web Page

unixODBC developer's list

Search Archive

Page

1 | 2

Articles in period: 14

May 2006

Language

Change language

Options

Current view: Threads only / Showing only 20 lines / Not hiding cited text.
Change to All messages, whole messages, or hide cited text.

Post a message
NNTP Newsgroup
Classic Gmane web interface
XML

XML

RSS Feed
List Information

About Gmane

Recent entries

ODBC driver information (24 Apr 2013)
Compiling unixODBC with MySQL driver on AIX (12 Apr 2013)
lt_dlerror may cause potential issue in multi-thread environment (12 Apr 2013)
RHEL 5 Linux UnixODBC/Freetds (12 Apr 2013)
A multi-thread contention issue when using lt_dlinit function (11 Apr 2013)
ODBC-api hooking problem (10 Apr 2013)
A core dump issue in __connect_part_one function (10 Apr 2013)
Handling out-of-memory (28 Feb 2013)
iconv leak (31 Jan 2013)
A issue about return_to_pool function (20 Nov 2012)
Buffer Overflow Study at Auburn University - unixODBC developers I wou (8 Nov 2012)
I am getting "Function Sequence Error" When I try to do SQLDescribePar (8 Nov 2012)
when to return SQL_NO_DATA from SQLExecute/SQLExecDirect (30 Oct 2012)
double free (30 Oct 2012)
segfault (30 Oct 2012)
SQLFETCH api is crashing (20 Jul 2012)
Where should one install .so files? (14 Jul 2012)
Error on Fisrt steps for noob (28 Jun 2012)
MS SQLServer drivers / Linux ODBC Driver Manager (7 Mar 2012)
Calling a store procedure (23 Feb 2012)
unixODBC-GUI-Qt question + 2 patches (19 Dec 2011)

Archives

22	April 2013
2	February 2013
1	January 2013
12	November 2012
9	October 2012
5	July 2012
2	June 2012
2	March 2012
8	February 2012
3	December 2011
6	August 2011
18	July 2011
14	June 2011
5	May 2011
8	April 2011
2	March 2011
2	February 2011
1	November 2010
9	July 2010
2	May 2010
3	April 2010
5	March 2010
12	February 2010
4	December 2009
3	October 2009
2	September 2009
20	August 2009
15	July 2009
73	June 2009
10	May 2009
4	April 2009
5	March 2009
38	February 2009
57	January 2009
56	December 2008
26	November 2008
23	October 2008
11	September 2008
29	August 2008
19	July 2008
21	June 2008
13	May 2008
1	April 2008
36	March 2008
1	February 2008
20	January 2008
13	December 2007
26	November 2007
8	October 2007
2	August 2007
3	June 2007
35	May 2007
11	April 2007
12	March 2007
62	February 2007
4	January 2007
1	December 2006
8	October 2006
9	August 2006
6	July 2006
14	May 2006
19	April 2006
3	March 2006
1	February 2006
17	January 2006
13	December 2005
87	November 2005
38	October 2005
56	September 2005
15	August 2005
41	July 2005
30	June 2005
37	May 2005
24	April 2005
134	March 2005
38	February 2005
26	January 2005
56	December 2004
48	November 2004
49	October 2004
42	September 2004
60	August 2004
74	July 2004
77	June 2004
74	May 2004
67	April 2004
53	March 2004
80	February 2004
65	January 2004
89	December 2003
32	November 2003
38	September 2003
28	August 2003
39	July 2003
55	May 2003
66	April 2003
51	March 2003
30	February 2003
28	January 2003
10	December 2002

Design

Zawodny | Right Menu | Left Menu

Your Own Design

Paste the URL of your CSS below. Download CSS template