headers
Jeff Schasny | 1 Aug 2010 17:47
Picon

Re: [U2] Universe Triggers

David,

I'd love to try it. The process of adding an "H" to the VOC pointer 
didn't do the trick and that was pretty much my last gasp.

David A. Green wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> I've written a socket driven email subroutine.  I haven't tried it from a
> trigger but you don't have to shell out so it might work.
>
> David A. Green
> (480) 813-1725
> DAG Consulting
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: u2-users-bounces <at> listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-bounces <at> listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 12:47 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] Universe Triggers
>
> Thank you all.
>
> After much putzing with the various parts involved it is beginning to 
> look like my original plan of having an email message sent when someone 
> adds a new record to this file is not to be. Apparently executing an 
> "SH" verb in a trigger program is not going to happen (Verb "SH" illegal 
> when a transaction is active.). Boom Splat.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Holt, Jake | 2 Aug 2010 18:21

[U2] Redback

We're currently running Universe 10.0.21 and I have RedBack 4.1.3.2 (its
old, long story...).  I can get everything to install properly it would
seem but when I go to test it I get the following error:

http://jonah/scripts/rgw.dll/DATAFLO
*******************
Sorry, an error has occurred in rgw.dll
       running on host 'JONAH' (192.168.221.15) at 'Mon Aug 02 10:57:57
2010'
       at line 1161 of 'rgwi.c'.
Can't connect to account 'DATAFLO' (DATAFLO:8413) rc=-1.
[rgw.ini file is 'rgw.ini']
(RedBack ErrorCode = 0xf0060010)
   (System ErrorCode=11004 - The requested name is valid, but no
data of the requested type was found. )
*******************

If I test just the gateway itself I get:
http://jonah/scripts/rgw.dll/
************
You have successfully performed a test connection
to the RedBack Requester (rgw)
running on host 'JONAH' (192.168.221.15).
Your RedBack accounts will be looked up in file
'rgw.ini'.
*************

So it looks to be reading the rgw.ini file properly.   This looks like a
DNS error, but if I change rgw/rgwresp to use the IP it gives me the
exact same error.  The virtual directory for the redback "scripts"
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 6 comments |
headers
Buss, Troy (Logitek Systems | 2 Aug 2010 21:09

Re: [U2] Redback

Have you reviewed the log files  in the redback account (on the u2 server) here:

	redback\rgw\log

Was this a working installation or a new one?
Anything changed?
Firewall settings?

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-bounces <at> listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-bounces <at> listserver.u2ug.org] On
Behalf Of Holt, Jake
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 9:22 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Redback

We're currently running Universe 10.0.21 and I have RedBack 4.1.3.2 (its old, long story...).  I can get
everything to install properly it would seem but when I go to test it I get the following error:
[...snip...]

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please
visit http://www.ers.ibm.com

This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is addressed and may contain information that
is privileged, confidential, or protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of the email or its contents is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately, by replying to the
message and deleting it from your computer.

WARNING: Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of inaccuracies as information
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bill Haskett | 2 Aug 2010 23:32
Favicon

[U2] mv.NET and U2.NET

Does anyone use mv.NET?  Do you have any problems; stability, 
connectivity, licensing, etc?  Is U2.NET a good substitute?  I 
understand they re-wrote the licensing.  What is the U2.NET cost?  Does 
anyone use U2.NET?

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Bill Haskett
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users <at> listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
andy baum | 2 Aug 2010 23:36
Picon
Favicon

Re: [U2] Redback

Jake,

This line :-

Can't connect to account 'DATAFLO' (DATAFLO:8413) rc=-1

suggests you are trying to connect on port 8413. Have you checked you don't have 
multiple rgw.ini files. In the early days of Redback the location of this file 
seemed to move with every release and I've been caught out a number of times 
with a system having two or more copies of rgw.ini containing conflicting 
information.

HTH,

Andy

----- Original Message ----
From: "Holt, Jake" <jholt <at> samsill.com>
To: U2 Users List <u2-users <at> listserver.u2ug.org>
Sent: Mon, 2 August, 2010 17:21:47
Subject: [U2] Redback

We're currently running Universe 10.0.21 and I have RedBack 4.1.3.2 (its
old, long story...).  I can get everything to install properly it would
seem but when I go to test it I get the following error:

http://jonah/scripts/rgw.dll/DATAFLO
*******************
Sorry, an error has occurred in rgw.dll
       running on host 'JONAH' (192.168.221.15) at 'Mon Aug 02 10:57:57
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Holt, Jake | 3 Aug 2010 00:17

Re: [U2] Redback

It is a new installation and there is no firewall on the machine at all.
It's only going to be used internally.  Just to be sure though I
reenabled the ICS/FW service and turned it off. 

The logfile doesn't seem to show any errors, it looks like everything
(as best as I can tell) fires up fine, it creates the in, out and err
files for the two webshares , dump_acct, and scoreboard.

If I run showrgw it displays all of the accounts I have in
RGW.INI/RGWRESP.ini and the responders start up in universe.  I can see
them both in the Taskmanager as well as the user list in universe.

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-bounces <at> listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-bounces <at> listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Buss, Troy
(Logitek Systems)
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 2:09 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Redback

Have you reviewed the log files  in the redback account (on the u2
server) here:

	redback\rgw\log

Was this a working installation or a new one?
Anything changed?
Firewall settings?

-----Original Message-----
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Holt, Jake | 3 Aug 2010 00:19

Re: [U2] Redback

I'm not sure where that port is coming from.   Just to be sure I went
and deleted all of the rgw.ini files (I had a few from reinstalls) and
left only the newest one.  SHOWRGW.exe displays the accounts I have
setup in this RGW.INI so I would expect I have the right file.

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-bounces <at> listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-bounces <at> listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of andy baum
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 4:36 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Redback

Jake,

This line :-

Can't connect to account 'DATAFLO' (DATAFLO:8413) rc=-1

suggests you are trying to connect on port 8413. Have you checked you
don't have multiple rgw.ini files. In the early days of Redback the
location of this file seemed to move with every release and I've been
caught out a number of times with a system having two or more copies of
rgw.ini containing conflicting information.

HTH,

Andy

----- Original Message ----
From: "Holt, Jake" <jholt <at> samsill.com>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Charlie Noah | 3 Aug 2010 01:09
Picon

Re: [U2] mv.NET and U2.NET

Bill,

We're just getting into MV.NET with Jbase, using one pad PC running a 
shop bay scheduling system. We are finding it very expensive, difficult 
to work with and a resource HOG. One session took as much bandwidth as 
the entire store it's being used at normally takes - one of our bigger 
stores, so that's considerable. I'm not really involved with it, thank 
God, but I'm seeing the fallout. I don't know anything about U2.NET.

Regards,
Charlie Noah
Inland Truck Parts Company

On 08-02-2010 4:32 PM, Bill Haskett wrote:
> Does anyone use mv.NET?  Do you have any problems; stability, 
> connectivity, licensing, etc?  Is U2.NET a good substitute?  I 
> understand they re-wrote the licensing.  What is the U2.NET cost?  
> Does anyone use U2.NET?
>
> Any thoughts would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill Haskett
> _______________________________________________
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users <at> listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
_______________________________________________
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Charles Carroll | 3 Aug 2010 01:22
Favicon

[U2] x509 Certificates How to Use in Code what path to use?

using System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates;

public class ....
{

    // The path to the certificate.
string Certificate = "Certificate.cer";

// Load the certificate into an X509Certificate object.
X509Certificate cert = X509Certificate.CreateFromCertFile(Certificate);

My concern is do I just map a Samba drive to the Unix/Pik server where my
.cer file lives or is there a Unix path trick that U2.net will understand?

Anyone using x509 .cer files?
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users <at> listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Tony Gravagno | 3 Aug 2010 01:39
Picon
Favicon

Re: [U2] mv.NET and U2.NET

(People offended by discussion of products by those who sell
those products should feel free to delete such commentary.  My
opinion of software that I use does not get invalidated when I
take the next step to "eat my own dogfood" and sell and support
software that I like.)

> From: Bill Haskett
> Does anyone use mv.NET?  Do you have any problems; stability, 
> connectivity, licensing, etc?

A lot of companies do use mv.NET - they can respond here for
themselves if they wish.  Personally I use it every day for all
MV development, and my decision to do so is constantly
re-affirmed when I think of the tools I was using in the past.
BlueFinity continues to be an excellent business partner and my
decision to sell mv.NET as a part of our overall services and
solutions offering is also continually reaffirmed.

> Is U2.NET a good substitute?  I understand they 
> re-wrote the licensing.  What is the U2.NET cost?  
> Does anyone use U2.NET?

At the risk of sounding like I'm disparaging a competing
offering, here is my understanding of U2.NET.  Corrections are
welcome:
1) U2.NET is essentially an old version of mv.NET (a fork).  A
license to the source was purchased by IBM from BlueFinity.  It's
essentially v3.2.x (?) frozen in time.
2) It has not progressed in sync with mv.NET to support new
features like Solution Objects (code generation of strongly-typed
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane