Closed: (IBATIS-209) Inline TypeHandler support

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-209?page=all ]

Jeff Butler closed IBATIS-209:
------------------------------

    Fix Version: 2.2.0
     Resolution: Fixed

This was actually added quite some time ago, but it's just barely been documented.  Also, until 2.2.0 the
specified handler must be of type TypeHandlerCallback.  With 2.2.0 and later it can be either
TypeHanderCallback, or TypeHandler.

> Inline TypeHandler support
> --------------------------
>
>          Key: IBATIS-209
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-209
>      Project: iBatis for Java
>         Type: Wish

>   Components: SQL Maps
>     Reporter: Troy Bourdon
>      Fix For: 2.2.0

>
> About a year ago there was talk of adding support for specifying type handlers inline. This would solve the
problem of having to create a parameter map for inserts/updates if any of the parameters used type
handlers. Was this feature ever implemented. I know as of 2.0.7 this feature is not supported.

Release Status???

Re: Release Status???

I have nothing for it...

On 6/30/06, Jeff Butler <jeffgbutler <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I believe I'm finished with everything I wanted to do for 2.2.0.  I'm
> wondering what everyone else's status is.
>
> I would be happy to act as release manager for a 2.2.0 release if there's a
> consensus that it's time to do that.  Or, if there are other things that
> folks are working on, we could wait a little while longer.
>
> Let me know what you think about starting the process for 2.2.0 - I'm +1 for
> doing it, with the caveat that I'm not sure what everyone else is working
> on.
>
>
> Jeff Butler
>

Re: Release Status???

I vote for a maven package.

On 6/30/06, Larry Meadors <lmeadors <at> apache.org> wrote:
> I have nothing for it...
>
> On 6/30/06, Jeff Butler <jeffgbutler <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I'm finished with everything I wanted to do for 2.2.0.  I'm
> > wondering what everyone else's status is.
> >
> > I would be happy to act as release manager for a 2.2.0 release if there's a
> > consensus that it's time to do that.  Or, if there are other things that
> > folks are working on, we could wait a little while longer.
> >
> > Let me know what you think about starting the process for 2.2.0 - I'm +1 for
> > doing it, with the caveat that I'm not sure what everyone else is working
> > on.
> >
> >
> > Jeff Butler
> >
>

Re: Release Status???

Re: Release Status???

Yup that. Would make my life little bit simpler :)

On 7/1/06, Jeff Butler <jeffgbutler <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Are you referencing this issue:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-122
>
> Or something else?
>
>
> Jeff Butler
>
>
>
> On 7/1/06, Jerome Gagner <phpmonkey <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > I vote for a maven package.
> >
> > On 6/30/06, Larry Meadors <lmeadors <at> apache.org > wrote:
> > > I have nothing for it...
> > >
> > > On 6/30/06, Jeff Butler <jeffgbutler <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I believe I'm finished with everything I wanted to do for 2.2.0.  I'm
> > > > wondering what everyone else's status is.
> > > >
> > > > I would be happy to act as release manager for a 2.2.0 release if
> there's a
> > > > consensus that it's time to do that.  Or, if there are other things
> that
> > > > folks are working on, we could wait a little while longer.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know what you think about starting the process for 2.2.0 - I'm
> +1 for
> > > > doing it, with the caveat that I'm not sure what everyone else is
> working
> > > > on.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Butler
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Re: Release Status???

Re: Release Status???

Re: Release Status???

Re: Release Status???