Hello! After all other problems seems to be solved more or less fine for us, one big problem still be left: http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 Has there been made any progress? MfG, Lars Schimmer -- ------------------------------------------------------------- TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung Tel: +43 316 873-5405 E-Mail: l.schimmer@... Fax: +43 316 873-5402 PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723
> Hello! > After all other problems seems to be solved more or less fine for us, > one big problem still be left: > http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 > Has there been made any progress? I've got some hideous hacks in my local tree but nothing commit worthy yet. -- -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:20 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > Hello! > > After all other problems seems to be solved more or less fine for us, > > one big problem still be left: > > http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 > > Has there been made any progress? > I've got some hideous hacks in my local tree but nothing commit worthy > yet. I posted a $50 USD bounty for this bug. <http://www.opensourcexperts.com/Bounty/showDetail.html?itemid=153> In case someone wants to get to it before me; or add to the bounty and motivate others [me?] to get to it sooner. -- -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
On 06.05.2009, at 19:51, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > I posted a $50 USD bounty for this bug. > <http://www.opensourcexperts.com/Bounty/showDetail.html?itemid=153> > In case someone wants to get to it before me; or add to the bounty and > motivate others [me?] to get to it sooner. If no one adds this, I'll do it rather sooner than later ... But lets see whether someone else jumps inThanks, Helge -- Helge Hess http://helgehess.eu/ -- -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 10:24 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 15:10 +0100, Helge Hess wrote: > > On 15.03.2009, at 05:45, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > Panelview is much like Overview but with the addition of participants > > > included in the user's calendar panel. > > I'm not sure I understand what a 'panelview' is. > > Its something the user can configure in the WebUI preferences > Yes, when you click the 'drill down' view in the calendar in the WebUI > you can select the participants/resources whose appointments you wish to > see (appointments where the listed people are participants). > Specifically it is the defaults [preferences]: > scheduler_panel_persons > scheduler_panel_teams > scheduler_panel_resourceNames > Each is an array of the specified object identifiers. These can > currently be set in the WebUI via the drill down view (it remembers the > last settings) or via zOGI <http://code.google.com/p/zogi/wiki/defaults> > [our custom WebUI presents it as in the attached screenshot]. > This way a user can setup what they want/need to see on their calendar. > It operates much like an enhanced Overview. <http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2028> -- -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
On May 29, 2007, at 11:41, Helge Hess wrote: On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 19:40 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >I've done a few changes to the way insert/update operations work. > > First of all primary key batches now work again, don't know how they > > got lost (the SQL sequences reserves a batch of 10 keys per > > invocation, so far we only used one of them resulting in wasted key > > space ...). > > Next I changed the way object_version, last_modified, etc fields are > > updated, and I added those to a few classes which didn't have them > > before (eg docs, notes and projects) > > Finally I plan to enhance the database schema for 5.4. Mostly: > > - notes/documents attached to company records > Awesome! Didn't ever see the schema changes come across and am in need of notes<->contact. Were you thinking - ALTER TABLE document ADD company_id INT; - or - ALTER TABLE document ADD contact_id INT; ALTER TABLE document ADD enterprise_id INT; - personally I'd like the later (in part because it matches how we are 'hacking' notes currently) ? -- --(Continue reading)
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 09:56 +0200, Helge Hess wrote: > On May 29, 2007, at 01:40, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >> - parent_id in project table > > Hierarchical projects? > Yes. Not sure whether it would be better to just use obj_link for > that. parent_id would be a bit more convenient/faster in case we want > to check parent permissions. > >> - a few other minor things > > What about "Enh: Add ability to create hierarchies of depenedent > > tasks" > > http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1089 > > Jobs already have a parent_id, but that value seems to be treated > > oddly > > resulting from some relic code. > > (a) The current field could be recycled somehow and the relic code > > removed > If we want to have hierarchical tasks, reusing old stuff is most > likely the way to go. BTW, we are using hierarchical tasks extensively via zOGI these days reusing the "old" fields. I'm certain, at this poi > > (b) It could be solved with object links > For dependend tasks we would probably just use object_links. Not sure > whether tasks dependencies need additional information (associated > accounts?) which is not provided by obj_link's type and/or label. Don't know, haven't done anything with that idea. Dependencies are to advanced a concept for most users to want to be bothered with.(Continue reading)
> Helge Hess schrieb: > > On 22.02.2009, at 20:37, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >> Has Tobias' patch from > >> <http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1964> been > >> applied? Bug#1964 isn't mentioned in the ChangeLog at > >> <http://svn.opengroupware.org/SOPE/trunk/sope-ical/NGiCal/ChangeLog> > >> some some changes. > > I think I misread your comment in the bug. I thought that you did apply > > the patch ... > > If its working, sure we could apply it. > >> Seeing Bug#966 > >> <http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=966> is the > >> state of RRULE's in SOPE serviceable? Are there any thoughts about > >> adding RRULE parsing support to ZideStore > >> <http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1307>? > > I'm not sure about the exact state of the RRULE handling. But (AFAIK) > > OGo does use the NGiCal rrules even in the web interface. Some > > recurrences of the WebUI are expressed as iCal rules. > > So, sure, sans bugs it shouldn't be too bad. > Please wait before submitting the diff to trunk. I have a "better" > version of that (some issues with timezone and performance). So I would > provide this patch in a few moments. I've applied this to my SOPE tree; I'll try to run it through some tests this week. -- -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer(Continue reading)
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:27 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > Helge Hess schrieb: > > > On 22.02.2009, at 20:37, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > >> Has Tobias' patch from > > >> <http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1964> been > > Please wait before submitting the diff to trunk. I have a "better" > > version of that (some issues with timezone and performance). So I would > > provide this patch in a few moments. > I've applied this to my SOPE tree; I'll try to run it through some > tests this week. Arg, premature send clicking... When I build with this patch I do get: iCalWeeklyRecurrenceCalculator.m: In function ‘-[iCalWeeklyRecurrenceCalculator recurrenceRangesWithinCalendarDateRange:]’: iCalWeeklyRecurrenceCalculator.m:121: warning: unused variable ‘compareStart’ iCalWeeklyRecurrenceCalculator.m:120: warning: unused variable ‘timeZoneOffset’ <http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=688&action=view> -- -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer(Continue reading)
On 12.05.2009, at 17:09, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > Didn't ever see the schema changes come across and am in need of > notes<->contact. Were you thinking - > > ALTER TABLE document ADD company_id INT; > > - or - > > ALTER TABLE document ADD contact_id INT; > ALTER TABLE document ADD enterprise_id INT; > > - personally I'd like the later (in part because it matches how we are > 'hacking' notes currently) Attached is my preliminary update script, its not cleaned up at all. If you want, you can selectively apply changes to the main schema, though I guess we should tag OGo 1.2 first (I could just do that). Thanks, Helge
RSS Feed5 | |
|---|---|
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
20 | |
4 | |
1 | |
1 | |
66 | |
9 | |
4 | |
8 | |
42 | |
40 | |
25 | |
33 | |
32 | |
4 | |
6 | |
14 | |
23 | |
26 | |
10 | |
32 | |
23 | |
45 | |
13 | |
33 | |
55 | |
79 | |
56 | |
22 | |
25 | |
46 | |
39 | |
15 | |
18 | |
73 | |
9 |
