David Miller | 1 Nov 2003 10:27
Gravatar

Re: Error in Post_bug.cgi line 303

On 10/31/2003 11:54 AM -0500, David Miller wrote:

> You can either grab the patch off that bug, or download 2.16.4 when it gets
> posted this afternoon.

And just in case anyone's following along, trick-or-treating and some
last-minute stuff for work kinda got in the way this afternoon/evening.
There's a fair amount of stuff that has to be done yet (getting the
appropriate web pages queued for update on the website, getting some last
minute documentation changes checked in, etc) but we're within a few hours
of being ready to go, and I'm running out of steam for tonight.  So it'll
happen some time on Saturday :)
--

-- 
Dave Miller      Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System
http://www.justdave.net/             http://www.bugzilla.org/
-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>

Jason Pyeron | 1 Nov 2003 22:21

bit rot waiting to happen...

what needs to happen from approval of a patch to checkin?

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208714

also what is the story on custom resolutions / status?

Jason Pyeron

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-                                                               -
- Jason Pyeron                   http://www.pyerotechnics.com   -
- Partner & Sr. Manager         Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. -
-                               500 West University Parkway #1S -
- +1 (410) 808-6646             Baltimore, Maryland  21210-3253 -
-                                                               -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you 
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and 
notify the sender immediately.  Any other use of the email by you 
is prohibited.

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>

David Miller | 1 Nov 2003 22:43
Gravatar

Re: bit rot waiting to happen...

On 11/1/2003 4:21 PM -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:

> what needs to happen from approval of a patch to checkin?

Someone with write access to cvs checks it in.

> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208714

But it hasn't been approved yet.  In fact, the current version of the patch
on that bug hasn't been reviewed yet.  It has a review? flag set.  Pester
the requestee or request it from someone else.

> also what is the story on custom resolutions / status?

There's been lots of ideas posted.  It's waiting for someone to write code.
--

-- 
Dave Miller      Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System
http://www.justdave.net/             http://www.bugzilla.org/
-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>

Gervase Markham | 1 Nov 2003 23:13
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: POST_ and PRE_CHOMP?

Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> Why are our templates PRE_CHOMP by default? It's a lot more tricky for
> lines that end in template commands, isn't it?

When we initially wrote the first templates, we did some experimenting. 
We wrote some templates in the style we wanted to use, and then tried 
PRE, POST, both and neither to see which produced the nicer-looking 
HTML. The answer was PRE.

Turning both on makes it all one line (basically), and having none 
leaves too much whitespace and general ugliness. All of the current 
templates are written such that PRE does the right thing - I don't think 
  we can change it now.

> Also, since POST_CHOMP isn't defined anywhere, does it default to off or
> on?

off.

Gerv

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>

Gervase Markham | 2 Nov 2003 00:24
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Licensing issues

Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>     This is probably Gerv's territory; I would like to know what the
> current policy is for assigning copyright to:

Your question is loosely worded; do you mean "what is the value to use 
for 'initial developer'"?

>     1. Files created resulting from templatization.

They should have the same initial developer as the original CGI.

>     2. Entirely new files contributed to Bugzilla.jn

They should have the initial developer set to the, er, initial developer 
of the file :-)

In practice, as far as I can see, there's very little legal difference 
in the MPL between someone who is the Initial Developer and someone who 
is a Contributor. So it's nothing to worry about massively.

Note that there is no "assigning copyright" (from your original 
question) ever involved in licensing files under the MPL or the 
tri-license, or contributing them to Bugzilla; the person who wrote a 
particular file or code fragment always retains copyright on it.

Gerv

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>
(Continue reading)

Christopher Hicks | 4 Nov 2003 00:11

longdescs no pk?

(1) Why doesn't the longdesc table have a primary key?

(2) Would there be any harm in putting an autoincrement key or something
in there?  I can't think of any reason why it would, but my imagination is
currently unusually limited by the sensory overload of being at an
insurance conference at the Opryland.  I wish I was kidding.  :)

(3) Is there a preferred official solution to this?  It would seem like a
primary key across bug_id,who,bug_when would also work.  That's not as
'neat and clean' to store for my purposes, but if that's the official
answer I'll go with it.

I first noticed this when I was trying to hand edit some old comments
using Mysqltool.  (bad bad i know.)  But now I'm trying to track which
bugs have been billed and which haven't and a primary key, any primary
key, would make that a whole lot easier.

Any help on this would be appreciated.  I have't researched this as
thoroughly as I'd like because I'm stuck in a hotel without Internet.  
Ugh!  I hate modems.

--

-- 
</chris>

Writing about music is like dancing about architecture.

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>

(Continue reading)

Gervase Markham | 3 Nov 2003 23:40
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: The Bugzilla website needs an overhaul

michael joseph morgan wrote:
> http://oregonstate.edu/~morgamic/bugzilla/
> 
> Worked with the Mozilla beta site, tweaked a few style elements in 
> default.css, added the blue theme, drummed up a banner image (which most 
> of you will probably hate, :D) and added some content based on what's on 
> bugzilla.org's about page.

This is pretty good :-)

A few thoughts:

- We definitely don't want screeds of text on the front page. I've never 
liked the patronising tone of that bit of text which begins 'Bugzilla is 
one example of a class of programs called "Defect Tracking Systems"' anyway.

- We need to choose a flipping logo and be done with it! :-)

- News shouldn't be at the bottom of the left hand sidebar (it's 
probably moving in website-beta as well.) It's far too hidden.

- The first paragraph is too close to the "About Bugzilla" title.

- The search box's "raised" look is very odd.

Gerv
-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>

(Continue reading)

Joel Peshkin | 4 Nov 2003 00:14
Favicon

Re: longdescs no pk?

Christopher Hicks wrote:

>(1) Why doesn't the longdesc table have a primary key?
>
>(2) Would there be any harm in putting an autoincrement key or something
>in there?  I can't think of any reason why it would, but my imagination is
>currently unusually limited by the sensory overload of being at an
>insurance conference at the Opryland.  I wish I was kidding.  :)
>
>(3) Is there a preferred official solution to this?  It would seem like a
>primary key across bug_id,who,bug_when would also work.  That's not as
>'neat and clean' to store for my purposes, but if that's the official
>answer I'll go with it.
><snip>
>

I'd prefer #2.   That will also help with people who use M$ACCESS to 
front-end the DB for special reports while preserving my right to make 
multiple comments to the same bug within the same second.  That key 
could even turn out to be useful eventually.

-Joel

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>

Jonathan Schatz | 4 Nov 2003 03:21
Favicon

sql query question?

i've hit a wall trying to generate a report for my manager and i figured i'd
ask here. 

for a given range of dates, i need a list of bugs that were filed with a
particular target_milestone. this seems like it should be easy enough to do
with one query against 2 tables (bugs, bugs_activity), but everything i've
come up with has hung my mysql server. 

i've written a program to do this with many queries, and at least i have
results to give my boss, but i feel stupid for not being able to come up with
the correct magic query. any ideas?

-jon
--
Jonathan Schatz
Engineering System Administrator
VMware, Inc
"Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est."

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>

Bradley Baetz | 4 Nov 2003 10:12
Picon
Favicon

Re: longdescs no pk?

Theres a bug somewhere on comments being swtiched arround daylight
saving, because the second 2:30am is 'earlier' than 3am. I'd prefer a PK
of (bug#, comment#), since that makes it easy to get the current comment
nyumbers, so we could display them on teh midair checkin list, in
emails, and so on.

Bradley
-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers <at> gmane.org>


Gmane