krgn | 1 May 2008 16:08
Picon

[linux] scvim help folder installation

hi,

I just realised that the 'scvim-help' directory gets installed to PREFIX/share/SuperCollider instead of the PREFIX/share/SuperCollider/Help folder. its just cosmetic, but plays some role when packaging sc. call me a neat-freak :)


greetings,

karsten

Attachment (SConstruct.diff): text/x-diff, 135 bytes
_______________________________________________
Sc-devel mailing list
Sc-devel@...
http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
krgn | 1 May 2008 18:31
Picon

Re: [linux] scvim help folder installation

or even cleaner: install the help in "Extensions/scvim/Help"? Would be glad if someone could look this over and commit, as it would make packaging supercollider much easier (less exceptions to write).

thanks,

karsten

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:08 PM, krgn <k.gebbert-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
hi,

I just realised that the 'scvim-help' directory gets installed to PREFIX/share/SuperCollider instead of the PREFIX/share/SuperCollider/Help folder. its just cosmetic, but plays some role when packaging sc. call me a neat-freak :)


greetings,

karsten

Attachment (SConstruct.diff): text/x-diff, 141 bytes
_______________________________________________
Sc-devel mailing list
Sc-devel@...
http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
nescivi | 1 May 2008 21:52
Picon

Re: [linux] scvim help folder installation

On Thursday 01 May 2008 10:08:31 krgn wrote:
> hi,
>
> I just realised that the 'scvim-help' directory gets installed to
> PREFIX/share/SuperCollider instead of the PREFIX/share/SuperCollider/Help
> folder. its just cosmetic, but plays some role when packaging sc. call me a
> neat-freak :)

This is done intentionally, since the scvim-help files are not html but text 
based. If you have converted the complete helpfiles to text based documents, 
you don't want to have both in the Help tree of supercollider to show up in 
the Help.gui, as everything would show up twice.

sincerely,
Marije
nescivi | 1 May 2008 21:55
Picon

Re: [linux] scvim help folder installation

On Thursday 01 May 2008 15:52:27 nescivi wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008 10:08:31 krgn wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I just realised that the 'scvim-help' directory gets installed to
> > PREFIX/share/SuperCollider instead of the PREFIX/share/SuperCollider/Help
> > folder. its just cosmetic, but plays some role when packaging sc. call me
> > a neat-freak :)
>
> This is done intentionally, since the scvim-help files are not html but
> text based. If you have converted the complete helpfiles to text based
> documents, you don't want to have both in the Help tree of supercollider to
> show up in the Help.gui, as everything would show up twice.

addendum:

it could be good to have the help file for the SCVim class itself inside the 
class extension folder, so that it *will* show up in the Help.gui, and just 
have in the scvin-help folder the converted files of the main Help file tree.

sincerely,
Marije
ronald kuivila | 1 May 2008 22:06

sdif support

Hi all,

   Looking at Scott's SPEAR support makes me wonder....

   Has anyone fiddled with the standard SDIF libraries?  Should we  
add support in SC?

RJK
Arie van Schutterhoef | 1 May 2008 22:18
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: sdif support

>Has anyone fiddled with the standard SDIF libraries?
-Ages ago Rohan Drape started to work on SDIF within the context of SC.
 Never became clear what happened to it.

>Should we add support in SC?
-Definetely!

I think it is used quite a lot and would make more compatible with Max/MSP
for example.

AvS

......................................................................
......................................................................
     ` *===========================================================+++
     ` |arsche.net sound-image-word http://www.arsche.net/index.html |
       *===========================================================+++
     ` |Schreck Ensemble/Assembly - live electro-acoustic music-     |
     ` |             http://www.schreck.nl/index.html                |
     ` *===========================================================+++
     ` |S T R A T I F I E R - a multi-dimensional controller-        |
     ` |                  http://www.stratifier.nl/index.html        |
     ` *============================================================++
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
......................................................................
Josh Parmenter | 1 May 2008 22:41

Re: sdif support

Scott Wilson and I actually talked about this some time ago, and I  
think the solution would be to make SDIF synth UGens. One difficulty  
that came up though was how different SDIF files can be.

Can anyone actually find a spec for them? If so, I can probably code  
the interface and UGens quickly.

Where I have going with the ATS UGens recently is looking at ways to  
completely bypass the loading and sorting of the files in the  
language. The UGens already have to do math to find where in the data  
buffer data is stored, so I was going to re-do ATS to simply load the  
ATS file onto the server as a buffer, then the UGens would figure out  
the offsets needed to gather data. I think the same could be done with  
SDIF and even CSounds PV and LPC UGens.

The OTHER stumbling block I was hitting had to do with simply loading  
the files to the server. b_allocRead won't work since they aren't  
soundfiles. So, I need to define other OSC commands to do this. I  
think I know what I need to do, but haven't had the time. If someone  
CAN dig up an SDIF spec, I'll start on it again.

Josh

On May 1, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Arie van Schutterhoef wrote:

>> Has anyone fiddled with the standard SDIF libraries?
> -Ages ago Rohan Drape started to work on SDIF within the context of  
> SC.
> Never became clear what happened to it.
>
>> Should we add support in SC?
> -Definetely!
>
> I think it is used quite a lot and would make more compatible with  
> Max/MSP
> for example.
>
> AvS
>
> ......................................................................
> ......................................................................
>     ` *===========================================================+++
>     ` |arsche.net sound-image-word http://www.arsche.net/index.html |
>       *===========================================================+++
>     ` |Schreck Ensemble/Assembly - live electro-acoustic music-     |
>     ` |             http://www.schreck.nl/index.html                |
>     ` *===========================================================+++
>     ` |S T R A T I F I E R - a multi-dimensional controller-        |
>     ` |                  http://www.stratifier.nl/index.html        |
>     ` *============================================================++
>    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> ......................................................................
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sc-devel mailing list
> Sc-devel@...
> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel

******************************************
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/

“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own  
interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively  
or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this  
regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual  
renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social  
palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/
Scott Wilson | 1 May 2008 23:09
Picon

Re: sdif support

I have a class which reads Loris SDIF frames which could be adapted  
for general use. The problem is that SDIF is extensible.

It would be possible to do something with the standard frame types  
though.

Perhaps handler functions could be registered for arbitrary frame  
types allowing the class to be extended.

Spec is here: http://recherche.ircam.fr/equipes/analyse-synthese/sdif/

S.

On 1 May 2008, at 21:41, Josh Parmenter wrote:

> Scott Wilson and I actually talked about this some time ago, and I
> think the solution would be to make SDIF synth UGens. One difficulty
> that came up though was how different SDIF files can be.
>
> Can anyone actually find a spec for them? If so, I can probably code
> the interface and UGens quickly.
>
> Where I have going with the ATS UGens recently is looking at ways to
> completely bypass the loading and sorting of the files in the
> language. The UGens already have to do math to find where in the data
> buffer data is stored, so I was going to re-do ATS to simply load the
> ATS file onto the server as a buffer, then the UGens would figure out
> the offsets needed to gather data. I think the same could be done with
> SDIF and even CSounds PV and LPC UGens.
>
> The OTHER stumbling block I was hitting had to do with simply loading
> the files to the server. b_allocRead won't work since they aren't
> soundfiles. So, I need to define other OSC commands to do this. I
> think I know what I need to do, but haven't had the time. If someone
> CAN dig up an SDIF spec, I'll start on it again.
>
> Josh
>
> On May 1, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Arie van Schutterhoef wrote:
>
>>> Has anyone fiddled with the standard SDIF libraries?
>> -Ages ago Rohan Drape started to work on SDIF within the context of
>> SC.
>> Never became clear what happened to it.
>>
>>> Should we add support in SC?
>> -Definetely!
>>
>> I think it is used quite a lot and would make more compatible with
>> Max/MSP
>> for example.
>>
>> AvS
>>
>> ......................................................................
>> ......................................................................
>>    ` *===========================================================+++
>>    ` |arsche.net sound-image-word http://www.arsche.net/index.html |
>>      *===========================================================+++
>>    ` |Schreck Ensemble/Assembly - live electro-acoustic music-     |
>>    ` |             http://www.schreck.nl/index.html                |
>>    ` *===========================================================+++
>>    ` |S T R A T I F I E R - a multi-dimensional controller-        |
>>    ` |                  http://www.stratifier.nl/index.html        |
>>    ` *============================================================++
>>   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>> ......................................................................
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sc-devel mailing list
>> Sc-devel@...
>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
>
> ******************************************
> /* Joshua D. Parmenter
> http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/
>
> “Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own
> interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively
> or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this
> regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual
> renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social
> palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
> */
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sc-devel mailing list
> Sc-devel@...
> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
Scott Wilson | 1 May 2008 23:44
Picon

Re: sdif support


On 1 May 2008, at 21:06, ronald kuivila wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>   Looking at Scott's SPEAR support makes me wonder....
>
>   Has anyone fiddled with the standard SDIF libraries?  Should we
> add support in SC?

Oh I see, you're referring to this: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdif

S.
ronald kuivila | 1 May 2008 23:51

Re: sdif support

Hi all,

There is a sourceforge project with a c++ sdif file support library.

I am not really convinced that doing this exclusively at the UGen  
level is the right approach.
Obviously it is nice to have support at the UGen level, but it will  
be easier to adapt to new extensions
by doing file pre-processing in the language and then feeding values  
to the server.

So, I would vote for an SDIF file class in the language as well.

RJK

On May 1, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:

> I have a class which reads Loris SDIF frames which could be adapted
> for general use. The problem is that SDIF is extensible.
>
> It would be possible to do something with the standard frame types
> though.
>
> Perhaps handler functions could be registered for arbitrary frame
> types allowing the class to be extended.
>
> Spec is here: http://recherche.ircam.fr/equipes/analyse-synthese/sdif/
>
> S.
>
> On 1 May 2008, at 21:41, Josh Parmenter wrote:
>
>> Scott Wilson and I actually talked about this some time ago, and I
>> think the solution would be to make SDIF synth UGens. One difficulty
>> that came up though was how different SDIF files can be.
>>
>> Can anyone actually find a spec for them? If so, I can probably code
>> the interface and UGens quickly.
>>
>> Where I have going with the ATS UGens recently is looking at ways to
>> completely bypass the loading and sorting of the files in the
>> language. The UGens already have to do math to find where in the data
>> buffer data is stored, so I was going to re-do ATS to simply load the
>> ATS file onto the server as a buffer, then the UGens would figure out
>> the offsets needed to gather data. I think the same could be done  
>> with
>> SDIF and even CSounds PV and LPC UGens.
>>
>> The OTHER stumbling block I was hitting had to do with simply loading
>> the files to the server. b_allocRead won't work since they aren't
>> soundfiles. So, I need to define other OSC commands to do this. I
>> think I know what I need to do, but haven't had the time. If someone
>> CAN dig up an SDIF spec, I'll start on it again.
>>
>> Josh
>>
>> On May 1, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Arie van Schutterhoef wrote:
>>
>>>> Has anyone fiddled with the standard SDIF libraries?
>>> -Ages ago Rohan Drape started to work on SDIF within the context of
>>> SC.
>>> Never became clear what happened to it.
>>>
>>>> Should we add support in SC?
>>> -Definetely!
>>>
>>> I think it is used quite a lot and would make more compatible with
>>> Max/MSP
>>> for example.
>>>
>>> AvS
>>>
>>> .................................................................... 
>>> ..
>>> .................................................................... 
>>> ..
>>>    ` *===========================================================+++
>>>    ` |arsche.net sound-image-word http://www.arsche.net/index.html |
>>>      *===========================================================+++
>>>    ` |Schreck Ensemble/Assembly - live electro-acoustic music-     |
>>>    ` |             http://www.schreck.nl/index.html                |
>>>    ` *===========================================================+++
>>>    ` |S T R A T I F I E R - a multi-dimensional controller-        |
>>>    ` |                  http://www.stratifier.nl/index.html        |
>>>    ` *============================================================++
>>>   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>>> .................................................................... 
>>> ..
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sc-devel mailing list
>>> Sc-devel@...
>>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
>>
>> ******************************************
>> /* Joshua D. Parmenter
>> http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/
>>
>> “Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own
>> interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively
>> or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this
>> regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual
>> renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social
>> palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
>> */
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sc-devel mailing list
>> Sc-devel@...
>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sc-devel mailing list
> Sc-devel@...
> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
>

Gmane