Re: Audio Drama
2008-12-12 04:43:21 GMT
This has come up several times, going back to my original proposal for an OTR style, back in April 2008 or so. The major probloem is that these ought to be treated as NATs by show title, date, and show title, but don't well fit the normal MB structure. However, especially with more and more radio shows offering themselves (see npr.org) online, my sense is that we'll quite soon see more of these, and not just shows from the 1920's and 30's, but modern shows as well.
Does anyone have any good ideas as to how we can possibly handle radio shows - dramas, as well as non-dramas, if the goal is to handle not only musical audio, but all audio?
> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:46:01 -0500
> From: sailorleo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
> To: musicbrainz-style-VWJlPdIPk9unah5wVhspdpv38IJrVKKD@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [mb-style] Audio Drama
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Z <johnnyooh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Any idea on how to deal with artists on tracks that are audio drama, radio
> > drama, radio theatre, etc.? Should it be the writer? What if it is a drama
> > re-enacting a manga (comic)? Should it be the script writer or the poriginal
> > manga creator? (I'm thinking about Video Girl Ai's 2nd soundtrack:
> > http://eyevocal.ottawa-anime.org/ailovemusic/vgaist2.htm ) I couldn't find
> > anything on the wiki.
> Personally, I'd say mark the script writer as the composer,
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style