1 Mar 2012 09:28
1 Mar 2012 09:33
Re: testing denemo 0.9.4
Jeremiah - did this appear on the m/l (and/or did you get to see it?) I think you may have forgotten to git add denemo_file_update.sh as I don't see anything in git about it. The other problem, libporttime, I don't know about... Richard On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 21:07 +0000, Sebastian wrote: > couple of things: > on my (fedora 16) linux, libporttime doesn'tr exist: aparrently newer versions > have the code from libporttime incorporated in libportmidi. > I fixed this by removing -lporttime from configure.in but that's probably not > the correct solution (I don't understand autotools). > > Also, make install fails like this: > ... > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/seb/src/denemo' > make[1]: *** No rule to make target `denemo_file_update.sh', needed by > `all-am'. Stop. > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/seb/src/denemo' > make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > > Otherwise, thank you for keeping at it > > Seb > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by Savannah > http://savannah.gnu.org/ >(Continue reading)
1 Mar 2012 14:51
www.denemo.org is broken?
I was doing some work on the server. Does it look still do this? Jeremiah Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T Richard Shann <richard.shann@...> wrote: >I am just getting source code trying to access denemo.org... >Richard > > > >_______________________________________________ >Denemo-devel mailing list >Denemo-devel@... >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
1 Mar 2012 15:55
Re: testing denemo 0.9.4
On 03/01/2012 02:33 AM, Richard Shann wrote: > Jeremiah - did this appear on the m/l (and/or did you get to see it?) I did not see anything from you. I only saw the email that I sent and the reply you made to this email with thread named: [Denemo-devel] 0.9.4rc1 tarball for testing > I think you may have forgotten to > git add denemo_file_update.sh No. Its in the stable-0.9.4 branch and should be in the tarball. I have not had time to test the tarball yet. > as I don't see anything in git about it. Thats because its in the 0.9.4 branch. Do you want it in master? I though only 0.9.4 would be the transitional release. > The other problem, libporttime, I don't know about... I am confused. Maybe lack of sleep. What are you referring to? Jeremiah > > Richard > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 21:07 +0000, Sebastian wrote: >> couple of things: >> on my (fedora 16) linux, libporttime doesn'tr exist: aparrently newer versions >> have the code from libporttime incorporated in libportmidi. >> I fixed this by removing -lporttime from configure.in but that's probably not >> the correct solution (I don't understand autotools).(Continue reading)
1 Mar 2012 15:57
Re: The online denemo manual
On 02/29/2012 11:51 AM, Richard Shann wrote: > This isn't displaying anything when you click on the link - someone just > remarked on that on irc #denemo. I just changed the link. It takes the user away from the tiki website though. I just realised now that I have to install a plugin to get that to work the way we want it to. I will do that when I get time. Jeremiah > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Denemo-devel mailing list > Denemo-devel@... > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
2 Mar 2012 13:41
Re: testing denemo 0.9.4
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 08:55 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > On 03/01/2012 02:33 AM, Richard Shann wrote: > > Jeremiah - did this appear on the m/l (and/or did you get to see it?) > > I did not see anything from you. I only saw the email that I sent and > the reply you made to this email with thread named: > > [Denemo-devel] 0.9.4rc1 tarball for testing > > I think you may have forgotten to > > git add denemo_file_update.sh > > No. Its in the stable-0.9.4 branch and should be in the tarball. I have > not had time to test the tarball yet. > > > as I don't see anything in git about it. > Thats because its in the 0.9.4 branch. ah, I see > Do you want it in master? I > though only 0.9.4 would be the transitional release. yes, that's fine, it won't be useful after 0.9.4, indeed it would be confusing. > > > The other problem, libporttime, I don't know about... > I am confused. Maybe lack of sleep. What are you referring to? I was referring to the problem reported by Sebastian (see below) which evidently didn't get sent to the m/l. I would guess that pkg-config reports -lporttime for libportmidi, and (judging from what he says) that it is not actually required by any call we make to libportmidi, and so he was able to delete it from configure and get a build.(Continue reading)
2 Mar 2012 17:25
Re: testing denemo 0.9.4
On 03/02/2012 06:41 AM, Richard Shann wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 08:55 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: >> On 03/01/2012 02:33 AM, Richard Shann wrote: >>> Jeremiah - did this appear on the m/l (and/or did you get to see it?) >> I did not see anything from you. I only saw the email that I sent and >> the reply you made to this email with thread named: >> >> [Denemo-devel] 0.9.4rc1 tarball for testing >>> I think you may have forgotten to >>> git add denemo_file_update.sh >> No. Its in the stable-0.9.4 branch and should be in the tarball. I have >> not had time to test the tarball yet. >> >>> as I don't see anything in git about it. >> Thats because its in the 0.9.4 branch. > ah, I see >> Do you want it in master? I >> though only 0.9.4 would be the transitional release. > yes, that's fine, it won't be useful after 0.9.4, indeed it would be > confusing. > >>> The other problem, libporttime, I don't know about... >> I am confused. Maybe lack of sleep. What are you referring to? > I was referring to the problem reported by Sebastian (see below) which > evidently didn't get sent to the m/l. I would guess that pkg-config > reports -lporttime for libportmidi, and (judging from what he says) that > it is not actually required by any call we make to libportmidi, and so > he was able to delete it from configure and get a build. > If that is right, I don't know if there is anything we can do about it. > The user would need to set PORTMIDI_LIBS themselves (or whatever it is(Continue reading)
3 Mar 2012 12:05
Re: testing denemo 0.9.4
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 10:25 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > On 03/02/2012 06:41 AM, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 08:55 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > >> On 03/01/2012 02:33 AM, Richard Shann wrote: > >>> Jeremiah - did this appear on the m/l (and/or did you get to see it?) > >> I did not see anything from you. I only saw the email that I sent and > >> the reply you made to this email with thread named: > >> > >> [Denemo-devel] 0.9.4rc1 tarball for testing > >>> I think you may have forgotten to > >>> git add denemo_file_update.sh > >> No. Its in the stable-0.9.4 branch and should be in the tarball. I have > >> not had time to test the tarball yet. > >> > >>> as I don't see anything in git about it. > >> Thats because its in the 0.9.4 branch. > > ah, I see > >> Do you want it in master? I > >> though only 0.9.4 would be the transitional release. > > yes, that's fine, it won't be useful after 0.9.4, indeed it would be > > confusing. > > > >>> The other problem, libporttime, I don't know about... > >> I am confused. Maybe lack of sleep. What are you referring to? > > I was referring to the problem reported by Sebastian (see below) which > > evidently didn't get sent to the m/l. I would guess that pkg-config > > reports -lporttime for libportmidi, and (judging from what he says) that > > it is not actually required by any call we make to libportmidi, and so > > he was able to delete it from configure and get a build. > > If that is right, I don't know if there is anything we can do about it.(Continue reading)
4 Mar 2012 19:52
4 Mar 2012 21:49
Re: 0.9.4rc1 tarball for testing
I can't access this file, when I click the link her or from the denemo.org announcment i see a page saying "Page not found downloads/denemo-0.9.4rc1.tar.gz" Also, current git won't let me compile, something seems to be wrong with top-dir Makefile after autogen.sh/configure, i get: Makefile:868: *** missing separator. Stop. (fresh git checkout) the line mentioned looks perfectly ok to me, so i guess the error must be somewhere earlier in the Makefile or Makefile.in, maybe something with whitespace, windows line endings or similar? Edgar Am Montag, 27. Februar 2012, 22:38:25 schrieb Richard Shann: > Thanks! > I have put this on the News (via Savannah) > Richard > > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 14:16 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > > http://denemo.org/downloads/denemo-0.9.4rc1.tar.gz > > _______________________________________________ > Denemo-devel mailing list > Denemo-devel@...(Continue reading)
RSS Feed