headers
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller | 13 May 23:41
Favicon

Status of Audiofile (assuming maintainership I nothing heard)

Hi,
This project seems like it has died here with no CVS access in a
millenia and patches not getting accepted. As we need some of these
patches integrated for GNOME and GStreamer I am looking into what can be
done.

Can I safely assume that this project is no longer being maintained and 
move it back into gnome-cvs once again where I will do maintainership of
it?
(Maintainership in this regards is integrating patches we need for GNOME
and GStreamer (and any other distro and OS specific patches that apply
cleanly.)).

Christian
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Davy Durham | 14 May 01:57

Re: Status of Audiofile (assuming maintainership I nothing heard)

Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:

>Hi,
>This project seems like it has died here with no CVS access in a
>millenia and patches not getting accepted. As we need some of these
>patches integrated for GNOME and GStreamer I am looking into what can be
>done.
>
>Can I safely assume that this project is no longer being maintained and 
>move it back into gnome-cvs once again where I will do maintainership of
>it?
>(Maintainership in this regards is integrating patches we need for GNOME
>and GStreamer (and any other distro and OS specific patches that apply
>cleanly.)).
>
>Christian
>
>
No... Michael is slowly but surely working on getting a patch of mine in....
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller | 14 May 19:50
Favicon

Re: Status of Audiofile (assuming maintainership I nothing heard)

Hi Davy,
Well it is your patch we need included so if it gets included then I
guess we can wait. I guess I try waiting for 14 more days before doing
something drastic :)

Also there are patches in GNOME bugzilla for audiofile that need
reviewing and if useable commited. 

Christian

On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 01:57, Davy Durham wrote:
> Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >This project seems like it has died here with no CVS access in a
> >millenia and patches not getting accepted. As we need some of these
> >patches integrated for GNOME and GStreamer I am looking into what can be
> >done.
> >
> >Can I safely assume that this project is no longer being maintained and 
> >move it back into gnome-cvs once again where I will do maintainership of
> >it?
> >(Maintainership in this regards is integrating patches we need for GNOME
> >and GStreamer (and any other distro and OS specific patches that apply
> >cleanly.)).
> >
> >Christian
> >
> >
> No... Michael is slowly but surely working on getting a patch of mine in....
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Davy Durham | 15 May 01:21

Re: Status of Audiofile (assuming maintainership I nothing heard)

Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:

>Hi Davy,
>Well it is your patch we need included so if it gets included then I
>guess we can wait. I guess I try waiting for 14 more days before doing
>something drastic :)
>
>Also there are patches in GNOME bugzilla for audiofile that need
>reviewing and if useable commited. 
>
Okay, well, Michael, I guess you see this...

If anyone else out there has some proprietary .wav editing software 
please send me/Michael some .wav files with a few cues in them and also 
describe where they should appear and with what cue names....   I and 
Michael's last conversation involved needing some files to just test and 
make sure the patch works with most other prominent .wav file editing 
software.

Sound Forge XP 4.5 and 5.0 should be covered...
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Daniel Kobras | 15 May 11:47
Picon

Re: Status of Audiofile (assuming maintainership I nothing heard)

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:50:13PM +0200, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> Also there are patches in GNOME bugzilla for audiofile that need
> reviewing and if useable commited. 

#51271 was a bug in 0.2.1, fixed in 0.2.2.
#55002 valid, needs trivial patch to acconfig.h.  The vsnprintf
       workaround might fix #78164 on OSF/1 as well.  (cf. PatchSets
       76 and 77 below.)
#53939 weird, but so what.  Changes won't break anything that wasn't
       broken before.  (cf. PatchSet 78 below.)
#63640 needs investigation, but backtrace isn't particularly helpful.
       Might well be an application bug.

Rest of the reports are either utter crap, application bugs, or don't
bear any apparent relationship to audiofile at all.

> > >This project seems like it has died here with no CVS access in a
> > >millenia and patches not getting accepted.

Not quite.  Last patch of mine went in on Feb 21st this year.  However,
there seems to be a problem with the CVS repository on oss.sgi.com,
which is back at the state of the 0.2.3 release.  Looks like it had to
be restored from an old backup recently.

Regards,

Daniel.

---------------------
PatchSet 76
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller | 15 May 15:53
Favicon

Re: Status of Audiofile (assuming maintainership I nothing heard)

Hi Daniel,
Thanks for going over the bugs. I close them now.

Christian

On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 11:47, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:50:13PM +0200, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> > Also there are patches in GNOME bugzilla for audiofile that need
> > reviewing and if useable commited. 
> 
> #51271 was a bug in 0.2.1, fixed in 0.2.2.
> #55002 valid, needs trivial patch to acconfig.h.  The vsnprintf
>        workaround might fix #78164 on OSF/1 as well.  (cf. PatchSets
>        76 and 77 below.)
> #53939 weird, but so what.  Changes won't break anything that wasn't
>        broken before.  (cf. PatchSet 78 below.)
> #63640 needs investigation, but backtrace isn't particularly helpful.
>        Might well be an application bug.
> 
> Rest of the reports are either utter crap, application bugs, or don't
> bear any apparent relationship to audiofile at all.
> 
> > > >This project seems like it has died here with no CVS access in a
> > > >millenia and patches not getting accepted.
> 
> Not quite.  Last patch of mine went in on Feb 21st this year.  However,
> there seems to be a problem with the CVS repository on oss.sgi.com,
> which is back at the state of the 0.2.3 release.  Looks like it had to
> be restored from an old backup recently.
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael Pruett | 20 May 23:59
Picon

improved WAVE marker handling in CVS

I've checked in improved WAVE marker handling code into CVS.

If this feature is important to you, please check out the latest CVS
and let me know if you notice any problems.

Thanks are due to Davy Durham for his help in this matter.

Michael
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane