headers
Wilfried Middleton | 1 Sep 2004 05:53

Error Message when starting Apache 2.0 on Windows ME

I am receiving the following message when starting the Apache server on 
Windows ME with/or without a firewall:

C:\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache2\bin>apache
[Tue Aug 31 23:50:24 2004] [crit] (OS 10038)Socket operation on 
non-socket: make
_sock: for address 127.0.0.1:80, apr_socket_opt_set: (SO_KEEPALIVE)
no listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open logs

Is anyone familiar with what might be causing this (or has fixed it 
before) ?

Much appreciated

Wilf

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help <at> httpd.apache.org
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bryan | 1 Sep 2004 08:12

Re: Unsubscribe from getting single mails

Yes, but how can I unsubscribe from the single emails without unsubscribing 
from the list? I dont see that as an option on the apache.org list user's 
page. I guess I will unsubscribe, and then resubscribe with the digest 
setting. Bryan

On Tuesday 31 August 2004 08:27 am, Robert Andersson wrote:
> Bryan Fields wrote:
> > Hello all. I don't want to unsubscribe from user <at> httpd.apache.org, but I
> > was wondering if there was a way to just get a single digest email every
> > day
>
>     "If you prefer to receive a digest version of the list that sends
> groups of
>     messages in a single email, you can subscribe by sending an empty
>     message to users-digest-subscribe <at> httpd.apache.org."
>     -- http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
>
> Regards,
> Robert Andersson
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help <at> httpd.apache.org

--

--
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Bryan | 1 Sep 2004 08:20

users-digest-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help <at> httpd.apache.org
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Martinez Gonzalez, Francisco | 1 Sep 2004 09:09
Picon

RE: LogOut


!!

I found a solution, but only works on =>IE 6.0 SP1

The site with the solution is:
http://weblogs.asp.net/kclemson/archive/2003/11/17/53911.aspx

:)

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Martinez Gonzalez, Francisco 
Enviado el: martes, 31 de agosto de 2004 16:08
Para: 'users <at> httpd.apache.org'
Asunto: RE: [users <at> httpd] LogOut

:(

Thanks to all

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Robert Andersson [mailto:robert <at> profundis.nu]
Enviado el: martes, 31 de agosto de 2004 12:14
Para: users <at> httpd.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [users <at> httpd] LogOut

Martinez Gonzalez, Francisco wrot:
> I have a web aplication with HTTP basic authentification (headers). If I
> want to login with another user, I have to close the browser and open
> again.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Boyle Owen | 1 Sep 2004 09:11

RE: Adding timeouts to Apache 2.0

Plain text please...

Further to Jim's comments about the inherent difficulties of controlling
client behaviour from the server, I would venture that the game is not
worth the candle.

If you want to implement a timeout, then presumably you are worried
about security. If you're worried about security you shouldn't really be
relying on basic auth... It is a very simple mechanism which can be
penetrated with a limited effort. If you have something genuinely
important to protect, you simply have to use a server-sided session
management application (based on mod_perl, PHP, Cocoon etc.). 

To put it another way, if my bank put my account details behind a basic
auth login, I'd close my account immediately.

Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. 

Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat
keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This
e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the
exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est
un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du
Groupe SWX.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wallace, Brian S. [mailto:wallacebs <at> ornl.gov]
Sent: Dienstag, 31. August 2004 20:53
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
asiani@wanadoo.fr | 1 Sep 2004 10:38
Picon

Re: Virtualhost

Hello !

Don't forget me !
I don't understand why it does not run :))

Alain

>
> Hello
>
> I created 3 domain at ulimit.com
>
> A.euro.st
> B.euro.st
> C.fr.st
>
> ===================================
> I created 3 users on my Fedora linux box
>
> A
> B
> C
>
> ===================================
> I set right with :
>
> chmod -R 750 ...
> chown -R A.apache...etc...
>
> ===================================
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Robert Andersson | 1 Sep 2004 10:39
Picon

Re: Custom authorization of static content

Shailesh Bodas wrote:
> I was reading your post about protecting static pages which is exactly
> what I'm trying to do as well! The idea of including a PHP file that
> checks authorization is very promising and something I had not thought
> of. Did you find out if this might work in PHP5 the way Jeroen claims.

[Please keep it on the list.]

No, I haven't yet been able to. I have to test it at home (for time and
logistic reasons), but my internet connection has been dead.

I sure hope it will work, as Jeroen says it does, although I cannot
understand why it would work. I also wonder if it works correctly with
Content-type, Last-modified, MultiViews, etc.

There must be other ways as well. Perhaps one can do tricks with external
RewriteMaps, or some database auth module.

Regards,
Robert Andersson

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help <at> httpd.apache.org
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Peter Gebauer | 1 Sep 2004 10:52
Picon

Apache 2.0.50 adds UTF-8 in header by default even though AddDefaultCharset is Off.

Hello!

I have Apache 2.0.50 setup in a Debian system.

I have tried commenting and setting AddDefaultCharset Off, but the UTF-8 
encoding is still added for the Content-Type header unless I explicitly set 
it in a CGI, etc.

My static text and HTML files are ISO-8859-1 encoded, the system has no 
UTF-8 locales installed and I've commented all AddCharset except the 
ISO-8859-1, so how can Apache still add the header?
I have checked the mime control file, it contains no encoding information at 
all.

Is there any way to turn this behaviour off?

Also, it only adds the header if I make a HTTP 1.1 request, for 1.0 requests 
the Content-Type header is not added.

/Peter Gebauer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe <at> httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help <at> httpd.apache.org
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Robert Andersson | 1 Sep 2004 10:57
Picon

Re: What do I do about execO?

Harold wrote:
> 1) When I test the installation the black screen shows up but disappears
> instantly, but I can see "syntax OK" before it goes.

As Jim suggested, ditch the icons and work in a console instead.

> Socket operation on non-socket; make _sock for address 0.0.0.0:80
> apr_opt_set (SO_KEEP_ALIVE) no listening sockets available, shutting
> down.
> ...
> I think it's "Unable to open logs."

This sounds like Apache is already running; so that the socket and logs are
already opened.

> (Please note -- the MS-DOS route in
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/windows.html is incorrect for 2.0.)

Use the 2.0 docs, eg:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/platform/windows.html

> 3) The conf is as downloaded except that I have added two lines at
> the top...
> ScriptAlias /php/ "c:/php/"
> AddType application/x-httpd-php .php

Have you decided on whether to run as CGI or module? However, forget PHP
until Apache is up and running fine.

> I have tried nstat -an, and the window vanishes before anything can
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Luis Moreira | 1 Sep 2004 10:58
Picon

Re: Virtualhost

You have three VHs, all pointing to the same IP/port
When Apache gets a request, it will go to the first one that matches.
You need to either have different IPs, different ports or different names.

Assuming you keep port 80, thismeans something like

<VirtualHost A-site:80>
    DocumentRoot /home/A/www
</VirtualHost>

<VirtualHost B-site:80>
    DocumentRoot /home/B/www
</VirtualHost>

<VirtualHost C-site:80>
    DocumentRoot /home/C/www
</VirtualHost>

The names "A-site", "B-site" and "C-site" would then point to the same IP

I think you can also use "redirect", but I don't know how.
Anyway, RTFM (F stands for Friendly) :-)

Hope this helps

Luis

asiani <at> wanadoo.fr wrote:

> Hello !
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |

Gmane