We're getting ready for our 2.2 release and for this release we will also try to deploy our Maven jars to the Apache incubator repository. For those users who would like this, what UIMA artifacts would you like to see deployed? We'll probably deploy all of our jar files. Does it also make sense to deploy the UIMA eclipse plugins (where the Maven artifacts are zip files, not jars)? -Adam
Adam-- I don't think having the Eclipse plug-ins in maven would be useful to us. For that, just an Eclipse update site would be useful. We do use maven though, and having the jars in a repository will be really nice. Thank you. Speaking of maven, have you thought about creating maven targets to produce PEAR files? We want to build our annotators with maven and deliver them as PEAR files, but the best we can currently do is zip files. Greg Holmberg -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Adam Lally" <alally@...> > We're getting ready for our 2.2 release and for this release we will > also try to deploy our Maven jars to the Apache incubator repository. > For those users who would like this, what UIMA artifacts would you > like to see deployed? We'll probably deploy all of our jar files. > Does it also make sense to deploy the UIMA eclipse plugins (where the > Maven artifacts are zip files, not jars)? > > -Adam
Hi Greg, have you tried the Pear packaging Ant task that Michael wrote for the sandbox: http://incubator.apache.org/uima/sandbox.html#pear.package.task It's not Maven, but with the Maven Ant plugin, you should be able to create Pear files. --Thilo greg@... wrote: > Adam-- > > I don't think having the Eclipse plug-ins in maven would be useful to us. > For that, just an Eclipse update site would be useful. > > We do use maven though, and having the jars in a repository will be really nice. > Thank you. > > Speaking of maven, have you thought about creating maven targets to produce > PEAR files? We want to build our annotators with maven and deliver them as > PEAR files, but the best we can currently do is zip files. > > Greg Holmberg > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Adam Lally" <alally@...> >> We're getting ready for our 2.2 release and for this release we will >> also try to deploy our Maven jars to the Apache incubator repository.(Continue reading)
Hi all, our upcoming (hopefully very soon) 2.2 release will still be Java 1.4 compatible. We're currently having a discussion on the development list if for the next version, we should move to Java 1.5. This would mean that future UIMA versions would no longer be able to run in Java 1.4, but would require 1.5 or newer. Java 1.4 is getting quite long in the tooth, and most people have moved. Java 1.5 brought many changes and improvements which we would like to be able to exploit in UIMA. So my question is: would this cause major headaches for anybody around here? Anybody still committed to Java 1.4 for the foreseeable future? The corresponding uima-dev mail thread is here: http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev%40incubator.apache.org/msg03860.html --Thilo
I vote for 1.5! We have no need for 1.4 compatibility. I'm actually running it on Java SE 6...so I'm good. Andrew Thilo Goetz wrote: > Hi all, > > our upcoming (hopefully very soon) 2.2 release will still > be Java 1.4 compatible. We're currently having a discussion > on the development list if for the next version, we should > move to Java 1.5. This would mean that future UIMA versions > would no longer be able to run in Java 1.4, but would > require 1.5 or newer. > > Java 1.4 is getting quite long in the tooth, and most people > have moved. Java 1.5 brought many changes and improvements > which we would like to be able to exploit in UIMA. > > So my question is: would this cause major headaches for > anybody around here? Anybody still committed to Java 1.4 > for the foreseeable future? > > The corresponding uima-dev mail thread is here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev%40incubator.apache.org/msg03860.html > > --Thilo >
Andrew Serff wrote: > I vote for 1.5! We have no need for 1.4 compatibility. I'm actually > running it on Java SE 6...so I'm good. > Andrew > Thilo Goetz wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> our upcoming (hopefully very soon) 2.2 release will still >> be Java 1.4 compatible. We're currently having a discussion >> on the development list if for the next version, we should >> move to Java 1.5. This would mean that future UIMA versions >> would no longer be able to run in Java 1.4, but would >> require 1.5 or newer. >> >> Java 1.4 is getting quite long in the tooth, and most people >> have moved. Java 1.5 brought many changes and improvements >> which we would like to be able to exploit in UIMA. >> >> So my question is: would this cause major headaches for >> anybody around here? Anybody still committed to Java 1.4 >> for the foreseeable future? >> >> The corresponding uima-dev mail thread is here: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev%40incubator.apache.org/msg03860.html >> >> >> --Thilo >>(Continue reading)
As I know Java 1.5 is a kind of norm nowadays - I myself have been using Java 1.5.X for the past two years, so I think the later version of UIMA should move to 1.5 as soon as possible. Scott Piao -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Serff [mailto:lists@...] Sent: 08 August 2007 13:55 To: uima-user@... Subject: Re: Moving to Java 1.5? I vote for 1.5! We have no need for 1.4 compatibility. I'm actually running it on Java SE 6...so I'm good. Andrew Thilo Goetz wrote: > Hi all, > > our upcoming (hopefully very soon) 2.2 release will still > be Java 1.4 compatible. We're currently having a discussion > on the development list if for the next version, we should > move to Java 1.5. This would mean that future UIMA versions > would no longer be able to run in Java 1.4, but would > require 1.5 or newer. > > Java 1.4 is getting quite long in the tooth, and most people > have moved. Java 1.5 brought many changes and improvements > which we would like to be able to exploit in UIMA. > > So my question is: would this cause major headaches for(Continue reading)
We would welcome a move to 1.5. Marc -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Goetz [mailto:twgoetz@...] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 7:15 AM To: uima-user@... Subject: Moving to Java 1.5? Hi all, our upcoming (hopefully very soon) 2.2 release will still be Java 1.4 compatible. We're currently having a discussion on the development list if for the next version, we should move to Java 1.5. This would mean that future UIMA versions would no longer be able to run in Java 1.4, but would require 1.5 or newer. Java 1.4 is getting quite long in the tooth, and most people have moved. Java 1.5 brought many changes and improvements which we would like to be able to exploit in UIMA. So my question is: would this cause major headaches for anybody around here? Anybody still committed to Java 1.4 for the foreseeable future? The corresponding uima-dev mail thread is here: http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev%40incubator.apache.org/msg03860.htm l(Continue reading)
Dear UIMA users, We are very pleased to announce the beta release of RASP4UIMA. RASP is a domain-independent, robust parsing system for English. RASP4UIMA wraps the NLP modules of RASP (Sentence Parser, Tokenizer, Part of Speech Tagger, Morphological Analyser and Dependency Parser) as UIMA Analysis Engines. RASP4UIMA is available from http://www.digitalpebble.com/resources.html as a PEAR package. The documentation is available in the doc directory of the PEAR package and from http://www.digitalpebble.com/rasp4uima/index.html We'd love to hear your thoughts, suggestions or comments about it. On a slightly different subject we are considering wrapping the POS Tagger of RASP (which is in C) as a native annotator using UIMACpp. Please contact me if you're interested in doing this. Best regards, Julien Nioche --- http://www.digitalpebble.com Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
We have moved to 1.5. FYI, we find this tool useful when we want to run our 1.5 code on a 1.4 JVM: http://retroweaver.sourceforge.net Greg Holmberg -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Thilo Goetz <twgoetz@...> > Hi all, > > our upcoming (hopefully very soon) 2.2 release will still > be Java 1.4 compatible. We're currently having a discussion > on the development list if for the next version, we should > move to Java 1.5. This would mean that future UIMA versions > would no longer be able to run in Java 1.4, but would > require 1.5 or newer. > > Java 1.4 is getting quite long in the tooth, and most people > have moved. Java 1.5 brought many changes and improvements > which we would like to be able to exploit in UIMA. > > So my question is: would this cause major headaches for > anybody around here? Anybody still committed to Java 1.4 > for the foreseeable future? > > The corresponding uima-dev mail thread is here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev%40incubator.apache.org/msg03860.html > > --Thilo(Continue reading)
RSS Feed43 | |
|---|---|
60 | |
55 | |
53 | |
48 | |
59 | |
96 | |
25 | |
14 | |
58 | |
50 | |
117 | |
61 | |
38 | |
69 | |
64 | |
27 | |
37 | |
19 | |
30 | |
72 | |
40 | |
55 | |
33 | |
39 | |
116 | |
73 | |
55 | |
77 | |
44 | |
60 | |
124 | |
174 | |
62 | |
91 | |
49 | |
30 | |
136 | |
43 | |
33 | |
58 | |
44 | |
57 | |
114 | |
97 | |
96 | |
57 | |
69 | |
116 | |
59 | |
69 | |
100 | |
104 | |
141 | |
102 | |
74 | |
110 | |
43 |
