headers
Eddie Epstein | 2 Aug 2009 15:30
Picon

Re: [VOTE] graduate UIMA-AS from sandbox

+1 to both graduating and distributing the binary package as a separate add-on.

Eddie

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Marshall Schor<msa@...> wrote:
> I would like to propose graduating UIMA-AS from the sandbox, making it a
> separately downloadable "add-on" to base UIMA. It has been extensively
> used in several projects and has undergone (as a result) a lot of
> bug-fixing and hardening.  With the upcoming release, I think it would
> make sense to graduate it from the sandbox.  Other opinions?
>
> If there is general consensus around this, then I will kick off some
> other discussion topics on details of how to do this.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Peter Prettenhofer (JIRA | 3 Aug 2009 11:05
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Commented: (UIMA-1468) Saving of annotations and relations does not always work properly


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12738235#action_12738235
] 

Peter Prettenhofer commented on UIMA-1468:
------------------------------------------

Hi Jörn, 

I'm using 2.3.0.incubating-SNAPSHOT. 
We haven't changed the .corpus file manually. I attached the file to the issue. 

Thanks & best regards, 
Peter

> Saving of annotations and relations does not always work properly
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-1468
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1468
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: CasEditor
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.2
>            Reporter: Peter Prettenhofer
>         Attachments: caseditor.corpus.xml, caseditor.log
>
>
> We have encountered a problem concerning saving manually annotated documents with the Apache UIMA CasEditor.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Peter Prettenhofer (JIRA | 3 Aug 2009 11:05
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Updated: (UIMA-1468) Saving of annotations and relations does not always work properly


     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Peter Prettenhofer updated UIMA-1468:
-------------------------------------

    Attachment: caseditor.corpus.xml

> Saving of annotations and relations does not always work properly
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-1468
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1468
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: CasEditor
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.2
>            Reporter: Peter Prettenhofer
>         Attachments: caseditor.corpus.xml, caseditor.log
>
>
> We have encountered a problem concerning saving manually annotated documents with the Apache UIMA CasEditor.
> In short, not all annotations and relations are always saved when saving an xmi file. That is, oftentimes
we save an annotated document and reopen it with the annotation editor, some of the annotations and all
relations are missing.
> We are not quite sure what the underlying problem is and we even didn't manage to always reproduce it, but
this is what we've done and observed:
> After importing a text file (.txt) and opening its corresponding xmi file with the annotation editor we
annotated some entities and created relations among them afterwards. We then saved and closed that file.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jörn Kottmann | 3 Aug 2009 15:01
Picon

Re: [VOTE] graduate UIMA-AS from sandbox

Marshall Schor wrote:
> I would like to propose graduating UIMA-AS from the sandbox, making it a
> separately downloadable "add-on" to base UIMA. It has been extensively
> used in several projects and has undergone (as a result) a lot of
> bug-fixing and hardening.  With the upcoming release, I think it would
> make sense to graduate it from the sandbox.  
+1

Jörn
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Tommaso Teofili | 3 Aug 2009 15:02
Picon
Gravatar

Re: [VOTE] graduate UIMA-AS from sandbox

+1

2009/8/3 Jörn Kottmann <kottmann@...>

> Marshall Schor wrote:
>
>> I would like to propose graduating UIMA-AS from the sandbox, making it a
>> separately downloadable "add-on" to base UIMA. It has been extensively
>> used in several projects and has undergone (as a result) a lot of
>> bug-fixing and hardening.  With the upcoming release, I think it would
>> make sense to graduate it from the sandbox.
>>
> +1
>
> Jörn
>
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Jörn Kottmann (JIRA | 3 Aug 2009 15:04
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Commented: (UIMA-1468) Saving of annotations and relations does not always work properly


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12738326#action_12738326
] 

Jörn Kottmann commented on UIMA-1468:
-------------------------------------

Thanks, your .corpus file looks fine. Can you please test if UIMA-1470 fixes the problem ?

Jörn

> Saving of annotations and relations does not always work properly
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-1468
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1468
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: CasEditor
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.2
>            Reporter: Peter Prettenhofer
>         Attachments: caseditor.corpus.xml, caseditor.log
>
>
> We have encountered a problem concerning saving manually annotated documents with the Apache UIMA CasEditor.
> In short, not all annotations and relations are always saved when saving an xmi file. That is, oftentimes
we save an annotated document and reopen it with the annotation editor, some of the annotations and all
relations are missing.
> We are not quite sure what the underlying problem is and we even didn't manage to always reproduce it, but
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Burn Lewis | 3 Aug 2009 15:11
Picon

Re: [VOTE] graduate UIMA-AS from sandbox

+1
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Thilo Goetz (JIRA | 3 Aug 2009 15:40
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Commented: (UIMA-1462) SimpleUimaAsService has checked in SimpleServer libraries as binaries


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12738341#action_12738341
] 

Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1462:
-----------------------------------

Hi Tommaso, sorry for the delay.  I tested your patch for the simple server, and it works fine as far as
compiling is concerned.  On the other hand, we also want to include xbean.jar and jsr173_api.jar in the
distribution, so they should be copied to the lib directory.  Otherwise, users have to download those jars
before they can use the simple server.  Do you have any suggestions on how we could manage that?

> SimpleUimaAsService has checked in SimpleServer libraries as binaries
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-1462
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1462
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Sandbox-SimpleUimaAsService
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.2S
>            Reporter: Thilo Goetz
>             Fix For: 2.3S
>
>         Attachments: patch1462.txt, patch1462b1.txt, patch1462b2.txt, patch1462c1.txt, patch1462c2.txt
>
>
> For the upcoming release, this should be changed so it depends on the SimpleServer project directly.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Adam Lally | 3 Aug 2009 16:50
Picon

Re: [VOTE] graduate UIMA-AS from sandbox

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Marshall Schor<msa@...> wrote:
> I would like to propose graduating UIMA-AS from the sandbox, making it a
> separately downloadable "add-on" to base UIMA. It has been extensively
> used in several projects and has undergone (as a result) a lot of
> bug-fixing and hardening.  With the upcoming release, I think it would
> make sense to graduate it from the sandbox.  Other opinions?
>
> If there is general consensus around this, then I will kick off some
> other discussion topics on details of how to do this.
>

+1

  -Adam
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Adam Lally | 3 Aug 2009 16:59
Picon

Re: ASB.getAllComponentMetaData

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Jörn Kottmann<kottmann@...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the correct return type for this method ?
>
> Right now its declared to return a Map<String, ProcessingResourceMetaData>
> as
> documented, but is that correct ?
>

Yes, that's right.  I took a look at the code and the only thing that
looks suspicious with respect to that is line 274 of ASB_impl:

    mAllComponentMetaDataMap.put(aFlowControllerDeclaration.getKey(),
mFlowControllerContainer.getMetaData());

Where FlowController.getMetaData() has a return type of
ResourceMetaData, not ProcessingResourceMetaData.  But you should just
be able to change that call to:

mFlowControllerContainer.getProcessingResourceMetaData())

 -Adam
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane