Re: Log4J 2
Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier <at> gmail.com>
2012-02-06 09:24:17 GMT
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig <at> apache.org> wrote:
> On 2012-02-06, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> As you may be aware I have been working on Log4j 2 for about 2 years
>> now. It now consists of a fairly large body of code with fairly
>> decent documentation. I feel it is ready to come out of my
>> experimental branch and onto its own main branch where others will
>> hopefully feel more inclined to participate.
> For the benefit of the log4(X != j) communities, can you give some sort
> of elevator pitch for log4j 2.0? What is different? Given that the
> other projects around here have followed the 1.x model, it will be good
> to know what you considered good or bad of the "old" approach.
> Don't hesitate to send me to some sort of overview document, I admit I
> haven't looked for one, yet.
Great idea, could use that too. With the approaching ApacheCon EU I
think it would be a great talk there.