Curt Arnold | 3 Mar 2006 06:15
Picon
Favicon

strictxml sandbox

I've committed a minimally functional strict XMLConfigurator to the  
sandbox and updated the sample files and schemas before putting that  
experiment to rest for a while.  I was thinking that if things fell  
in place fast enough, it might give me an option for reworking the  
DOMConfigurator in log4cxx.  However, while I like a lot of things  
about the approach and hope to work it into log4j 2.0, it isn't going  
to help me with the log4cxx DOMConfigurator.

To check out:

svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/sandbox/strictxml  
strictxml

Builds with Maven 2 and Ant, but I didn't work an XSLT step into the  
Maven build so you have to manually run "ant preprocess" or the Maven  
unit tests will fail.

 From the STATUS file:

2 March 2006

The project is currently an early experimental prototype of a strict  
XML configurator.

The configuration language is not compatible with existing log4j  
configuration files.
The language is designed so that schema-aware editors or other tools  
can identify
most configuration errors and guide the user to create valid  
configurations.
(Continue reading)

Nicko Cadell | 13 Mar 2006 14:36

[VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10

The log4net project has voted to release log4net 1.2.10. We require
Logging PMC and then Incubator PMC approval before we can proceed.

The original vote proposal is here:
[VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4net-dev&m=114176984807315&w=2

The vote result is here:
[VOTE RESULT] (was: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4net-dev&m=114225535221544

The thread containing the votes is here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=114176995900005

The distribution download, md5 and gnupg sig are in my home directory
here:

http://people.apache.org/~nicko/log4net/test-build/

For reference the MD5 checksum is:
f9803fc6f75810c3f6fc16b57ccf5155

The list of issues fixed in this release can be found here:

http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10690&st
yleName=Html&version=11128

I am +1

Cheers,
(Continue reading)

Yoav Shapira | 13 Mar 2006 15:09
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10

Hola,
+1, and an impressive list of fixes/additions in this release!

Yoav

On 3/13/06, Nicko Cadell <nicko <at> neoworks.com> wrote:
> The log4net project has voted to release log4net 1.2.10. We require
> Logging PMC and then Incubator PMC approval before we can proceed.
>
> The original vote proposal is here:
> [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4net-dev&m=114176984807315&w=2
>
> The vote result is here:
> [VOTE RESULT] (was: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10)
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4net-dev&m=114225535221544
>
> The thread containing the votes is here:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=114176995900005
>
>
> The distribution download, md5 and gnupg sig are in my home directory
> here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nicko/log4net/test-build/
>
> For reference the MD5 checksum is:
> f9803fc6f75810c3f6fc16b57ccf5155
>
> The list of issues fixed in this release can be found here:
(Continue reading)

Scott Deboy | 13 Mar 2006 16:02

RE: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10

+1

Nice work

Scott Deboy
COMOTIV SYSTEMS
111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950
Portland, OR  97201

Telephone:      503.224.7496
Cell:           503.997.1367
Fax:            503.222.0185

sdeboy <at> comotivsystems.com

www.comotivsystems.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:nicko <at> neoworks.com]
Sent: Mon 3/13/2006 5:36 AM
To: Logging General
Subject: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10

The log4net project has voted to release log4net 1.2.10. We require
Logging PMC and then Incubator PMC approval before we can proceed.

The original vote proposal is here:
[VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4net-dev&m=114176984807315&w=2

(Continue reading)

Curt Arnold | 13 Mar 2006 21:34
Picon
Favicon

Re: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10

No tag for source, but did have an identified revision number  
(383994) for the source in the call for vote.  Is the intent to  
create the tag only after the votes by the PMC and Incubator?

MD5 checksum verified.

Nicko's key is not present in http://www.apache.org/dist/logging/ 
KEYS, but was at pgp.mit.edu, people.apache.org:~nicko/.pgpkey and  
http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/apache.html.

I'd like to hear from one of the other log4net committers that they  
were able to reproduce the build (with the exception of timestamps et  
al).

Nicko Cadell | 14 Mar 2006 12:31

RE: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curt Arnold [mailto:carnold <at> apache.org] 
> Sent: 13 March 2006 20:35
> To: Logging General
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10
> 
> No tag for source, but did have an identified revision number  
> (383994) for the source in the call for vote.  Is the intent to  
> create the tag only after the votes by the PMC and Incubator?

Yes a tag will be created for this version if it is approved. Perhaps we
should have created the tag already, especially as tags are cheap.

> MD5 checksum verified.
> 
> Nicko's key is not present in http://www.apache.org/dist/logging/ 
> KEYS, but was at pgp.mit.edu, people.apache.org:~nicko/.pgpkey and  
> http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/apache.html.

I will add it to http://www.apache.org/dist/logging/KEYS

My key is also available from:

http://people.apache.org/~nicko/public-key.asc
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/trunk/KEYS.txt

And in the KEYS.txt file in the distribution.

 
(Continue reading)

Ron Grabowski | 15 Mar 2006 02:06
Picon
Favicon

Re: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10

I downloaded:

http://people.apache.org/~nicko/log4net/test-build/incubating-log4net-1.2.10.zip

unzipped it and ran "build.cmd" on my Windows XP system with both 1.1
and 2.0 of the framework installed. This is part of the output from the
build.cmd file:

"
C:\incubating-log4net-1.2.10>build
LOG4NET_DIR is C:\incubating-log4net-1.2.10
NANTEXE_PATH is nant.exe
BUILD_FILE is C:\incubating-log4net-1.2.10\log4net.build
NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1932.0; rc3; 4/16/2005)
Copyright (C) 2001-2005 Gerry Shaw
http://nant.sourceforge.net

Buildfile: file:///C:/incubating-log4net-1.2.10/log4net.build
Target framework: Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1
Target(s) specified: compile-all
"

I saw this warning towards the end:

"
compile-net-1.1:

     [echo] Key file not found. You can generate a key file by running
'sn -k lo
g4net.snk'.
(Continue reading)

Nicko Cadell | 15 Mar 2006 13:20

RE: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10

Ron,

The download contains binaries for all the build targets. It looks like
you didn't clear the /bin directory before doing your first build. This
would have meant that you where building some of the build targets, but
most were not being touched at all and just left with the original
versions from the download.

The release builds are strongly named (where this is supported by the
platform). As you found, without the strong name key file none of
release builds are built.

When you removed the /bin directory and rebuilt you actually saw the
builds you are currently compiling. In order to build the release
versions you need to put back the strong name key. In order to build for
MS .NET 2.0 you need a newer version of NAnt
(http://nant.sourceforge.net/) a nightly build of 0.85 since 2006/03/04
supports the final release of the .NET 2.0 runtime.

To build the Mono and SSCLI build targets you need to install Mono
1.1.13 (http://www.mono-project.com) and SSCLI 1.0
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dndotnet/html/mssharsourcecli.a
sp). Note you need to build the SSCLI from source.

You can view the frameworks that NAnt has discovered by running:

build.cmd display-setup

Cheers,
Nicko
(Continue reading)

Niall Daley | 15 Mar 2006 14:57
Picon
Favicon

Re: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10

I've been able to recreate the build using:

NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.2256.0; nightly; 06/03/2006)
sscli 20021101
mono 1.1.13.4_0
.Net Framework 2.0

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Curt Arnold wrote:

> No tag for source, but did have an identified revision number  
> (383994) for the source in the call for vote.  Is the intent to  
> create the tag only after the votes by the PMC and Incubator?
> 
> MD5 checksum verified.
> 
> Nicko's key is not present in http://www.apache.org/dist/logging/ 
> KEYS, but was at pgp.mit.edu, people.apache.org:~nicko/.pgpkey and  
> http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/apache.html.
> 
> I'd like to hear from one of the other log4net committers that they  
> were able to reproduce the build (with the exception of timestamps et  
> al).
> 
> 

--

-- 
Niall Daley
Log4net Dev

(Continue reading)

Curt Arnold | 15 Mar 2006 15:12
Picon
Favicon

Re: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10

+1


Gmane