9 Feb 14:36
Re: Mandatory svnpubsub migration by Jan 2013
Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier <at> gmail.com>
2012-02-09 13:36:31 GMT
2012-02-09 13:36:31 GMT
Hello Infra! At the logging project most sub projects commit generated html to svn. Going live is a matter of "svn up". Guess there is no problem to use svnpubsub. But there is one component (the upcoming log4j 2.0) which has started with mvn site deploy. Is there a recommendation how combine this with svnpubsub? The idea was to deploy to a local folder which is then committed to svn. This would probably mean that a log4j2.0 website update does mean a huge commit because most sources might be touched. Is it a problem? Cheers, Christian On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer <at> yahoo.com> wrote: > [PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST! DIRECT ALL FURTHER > INQUIRIES TO infrastructure <at> apache.org] > > FYI: infrastructure policy regarding website hosting has > changed as of November 2011: we are requiring all websites > and dist/ dirs to be svnpubsub or ASF CMS backed by the end of 2012. > If your PMC has already met this requirement congratulations, > you can ignore the remainder of this post. > > As stated on http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html#svnpubsub > we are migrating our webserver infrastructure to 100% svnpubsub > over the course of 2012. If your site does not currently make > use of this technology, it is time to consider a migration effort,(Continue reading)
RSS Feed